Study Stopped
The study was stopped for feasibility (i.e., low recruitment)
Efficacy of Oral Antibiotic Therapy Compared to Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy for Osteomyelitis
CRO-OSTEO
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2012 guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections state that for the treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis "No data support the superiority of any specific antibiotic agent or treatment strategy, route, or duration of therapy." Traditionally, osteomyelitis has been treated with a long course of intravenous antibiotics, generally six weeks. Oral antibiotics with high bioavailability and adequate bone penetration have been shown in published studies to be effective for the treatment of osteomyelitis. The investigators propose to conduct a prospective, single-center, randomized, open trial at Loyola University Medical Center (LUMC) comparing the efficacy of oral antibiotic therapy to intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. The investigators hypothesize that oral antibiotic therapy is equivalent to IV antibiotic therapy. Bone/tissue cultures are obtained for all patients for clinical purposes and are sent to pathology for histologic examination and to the clinical microbiology laboratory for culture and susceptibility. Patients will receive six weeks of IV or oral antibiotic therapy depending upon their randomization group. Primary outcomes at six months clinical follow-up will include: (i) no evidence of bone infection and (ii) resolution of ulcer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Mar 2014
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 19, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 20, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 2, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 2, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 8, 2018
CompletedJuly 19, 2018
June 1, 2018
2.9 years
June 10, 2014
May 8, 2018
June 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Bone Infection
Six months following completion of treatment, the researchers record evidence of bone infection for each participant. A negative diagnosis is made when there is (i) an absence of infection based on clinical examination and (ii) down-trending of inflammatory markers. Otherwise, a positive diagnosis is made.
Six Months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Ulcer Resolution
Six Months
Study Arms (3)
Midfoot
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndividuals with an infection on the midfoot are randomized to an intravenous antibacterial agent or an oral antibacterial agent.
Hindfoot
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndividuals with an infection on the hindfoot are randomized to an intravenous antibacterial agent or an oral antibacterial agent.
Toe
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndividuals with an infection on the toe are randomized to an intravenous antibacterial agent or an oral antibacterial agent.
Interventions
Individuals in this arm receive an intravenous antibacterial agent. They are not assigned to specific medications. Individuals in this arm will receive an intravenous antibacterial agent as determined by their primary healthcare provider. This therapy is usually one of the following intravenous medications: (i) piperacillin/tazobactam (Zosyn), (ii) cefepime, (iii) metronidazole, (iv) aztreonam, (v) vancomycin, (vi) daptomycin, (vii) linezolid (Zyvox), and/or (viii) meropenem.
Individuals in this arm receive an oral antibacterial agent. They are not assigned to specific medications. Individuals in this arm will receive an oral antibacterial agent as determined by their primary healthcare provider. This therapy is usually one of the following oral medications: (i) sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX-TMP), (ii) clindamycin (Clindesse), (iii) linezolid (Zyvox), (iv) moxifloxacin (Avelox), (v) ciprofloxacin (Cetraxal), and/or (vi) metronidazole (Flagyl)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age and older
- Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (per past medical history documented in the patient medical record)
- Foot osteomyelitis (distal to ankle)
- Surgical debridement (in operating room)
You may not qualify if:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 500
- Pregnant or lactating patients
- Patients with organisms resistant to oral therapy
- Internal hardware
- Definitive amputations (BKA)
- Limb ischemia \[absent pedal pulses or ankle-brachial index (ABI) \< 0.5\]
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States
Related Publications (6)
Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, Pile JC, Peters EJ, Armstrong DG, Deery HG, Embil JM, Joseph WS, Karchmer AW, Pinzur MS, Senneville E; Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(12):e132-73. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis346.
PMID: 22619242BACKGROUNDSpellberg B, Lipsky BA. Systemic antibiotic therapy for chronic osteomyelitis in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Feb 1;54(3):393-407. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir842. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
PMID: 22157324BACKGROUNDLazzarini L, Lipsky BA, Mader JT. Antibiotic treatment of osteomyelitis: what have we learned from 30 years of clinical trials? Int J Infect Dis. 2005 May;9(3):127-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2004.09.009.
PMID: 15840453BACKGROUNDBouazza N, Pestre V, Jullien V, Curis E, Urien S, Salmon D, Treluyer JM. Population pharmacokinetics of clindamycin orally and intravenously administered in patients with osteomyelitis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Dec;74(6):971-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04292.x.
PMID: 22486719BACKGROUNDWukich DK, Armstrong DG, Attinger CE, Boulton AJ, Burns PR, Frykberg RG, Hellman R, Kim PJ, Lipsky BA, Pile JC, Pinzur MS, Siminerio L. Inpatient management of diabetic foot disorders: a clinical guide. Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2862-71. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2712.
PMID: 23970716BACKGROUNDPinzur MS, Gil J, Belmares J. Treatment of osteomyelitis in charcot foot with single-stage resection of infection, correction of deformity, and maintenance with ring fixation. Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Dec;33(12):1069-74. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.1069.
PMID: 23199855BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The trial was stopped prematurely for feasibility (i.e., low recruitment)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Pinzur, M.D.
- Organization
- Loyola University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Pinzur, M.D.
Loyola University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2014
First Posted
June 20, 2014
Study Start
March 19, 2014
Primary Completion
February 2, 2017
Study Completion
February 2, 2017
Last Updated
July 19, 2018
Results First Posted
June 8, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share individual participant data