Assessment of Chiropractic Treatment Using Reaction and Response Times in Members of the Special Operation Forces (ACT2)

NCT02168153 | Completed Results DMC

• 1 other identifier: 2012-0352
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 120
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate changes in reaction times (RTs) and response times (RespTs) following chiropractic treatment compared to controls in the Special Forces Qualified (SFQ) population, including Special Operation Forces who are part of the 160th SOAR regiment on flight status.

Conditions

Physiological Measurements of Response and Reaction Times

Keywords

Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy; Reaction Times; Response Times; Special Forces; Biomechanical Assessments

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

• Simple Reaction Time With the Dominant Hand

  Handedness of the participants will be determined on the basis of self-report. The subject will react to the appearance of visual prompts on the screen by pressing a button with the thumb of their dominant hand. A set consists of 11 prompts shown in sequence with a time period between the response to one prompt and the appearance of the next prompt ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 seconds in random order. The outcome variable for this test, the mean reaction time, is the average of the length of time between the appearance of each prompt and the press of the button in response to that prompt.

  Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit

• Simple Reaction Time With the Dominant Foot

  This test will be done in a manner similar to that for the dominant hand except that the participants will press a pedal with their dominant foot.

  Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit

• Choice Reaction Time

  Prompts on the screen will occur with the same time interval (1 second) in between the press of a button or pedal in response to one prompt and the appearance of the next prompt. Each prompt could be for either hand or either foot and the position of the prompt on the computer screen will indicate which thumb or foot should be used. If the wrong button or pedal is pressed, the software still goes on to the next prompt, but keeps track of how many incorrect responses were made. A set consists of a sequence of 41 prompts. The outcome variable for this test, mean reaction time, is the average length of time between each prompt's appearance and the participant's response.

  Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit

• Response Time Involving the Dominant Hand (Fitts Law Test)

  Participants perform a computerized simple target acquisition task (a Fitts Law task) to investigate their response times using a mouse with their dominant hand. The participant will complete a block, a series of target selections on a computer monitor, by working through 32 trials. That is, 32 pairs of 'hits' - meaning the mouse was clicked when the cursor was inside each of two circles that appear on the screen. The measured outcome from this task will be the sum of the times required to complete each trial.

  Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit

• Response Time Involving Whole Body Movement (T-wall)

  Participants will stand in front of the t-wall which is a commercially available device with a 4 x 8 foot bank of square buttons that are each 8 cm per side. When test is begun, one of the buttons lights up. The participant hits that button with either hand. The light inside that button then goes out and another button lights up until that one is hit. This process continues for a random sequence of 100 buttons. When last button is hit, all the buttons light up momentarily to indicate that the test is over. The measured outcome from this test is the time from when the first button is hit to when the last of the random sequence of 100 buttons is hit.

  Week 1-Study Visit 2, Week 2-Final Visit, Change from Visit 2 to Final Visit

Study Arms (2)

Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will complete questionnaires and biomechanical assessments, and additionally receive CMT treatment.

Other: Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy

Wait-List Control Group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants will complete questionnaires and biomechanical assessments

Other: Wait-list

Interventions

Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy OTHER

Participants will receive chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy consisting of High velocity low amplitude (HVLA) spinal manipulative procedures. These procedures are typically associated with a quick manual thrust and a cavitation sound. For the cervical spine, a procedure called a cervical index pillar push, thoracic manipulation will occur with unilateral or bimanual contacts in the prone or supine positions and lumbar/pelvis manipulation will be performed with a procedure referred to as side-lying or side-posture.

Also known as: Chiropractic Care, Spinal Manipulation

Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy

Wait-list OTHER

Participants randomized to the wait-list control group will complete questionnaires and perform the same study procedures as those randomized to the chiropractic manipulative therapy arm. After completing the required 2-week waiting period, those who wish to receive chiropractic manipulative therapy will be eligible to schedule treatment visits.

Wait-List Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Age range at least 20 years of age
• Written informed consent
• Active duty SFQ personnel or Special Operation Forces who are part of the 160th SOAR regiment on flight status stationed at the Ft. Campbell, KY military site

You may not qualify if:

• Pain Intensity (NIH's PROMIS- question #29) \> 4 at the Initial Visit
• Additional diagnostic procedure needed (e.g. x-ray)
• Bone and joint pathology contraindications for CMT. Potential participants with recent spinal fracture, concurrent spinal or paraspinal tumor(s), spinal or paraspinal infection(s), inflammatory arthropathies and significant osteoporosis will be referred for appropriate care.
• Other contraindications for CMT (i.e., unstable spinal segments, cauda equina syndrome)
• Currently being treated for traumatic brain injury (TBI)
• Reasonable chance that within 2-4 weeks of initial participation they may be unable to complete the study, i.e., deployment, receive orders for a distant duty assignment or training site or otherwise be absent from the current military site over the study participation period.
• Received care from a Doctor of Chiropractic within the past 30 days.
• Pregnant or planning to become pregnant within 4 weeks.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• RAND: lead
• Palmer College of Chiropractic: collaborator
• Samueli Institute for Information Biology: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Blanchfield Army Community Hospital

Fort Campbell North, Kentucky, 42223, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

• DeVocht JW, Smith DL, Long CR, Corber L, Kane B, Jones TM, Goertz CM. The effect of chiropractic treatment on the reaction and response times of special operation forces military personnel: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Sep 20;17(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1580-1.

  PMID: 27645465 BACKGROUND

• DeVocht JW, Vining R, Smith DL, Long C, Jones T, Goertz C. Effect of chiropractic manipulative therapy on reaction time in special operations forces military personnel: a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Jan 3;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3133-2.

  PMID: 30606225 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Manipulation, Spinal; Waiting Lists

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Musculoskeletal Manipulations; Physical Therapy Modalities; Therapeutics; Rehabilitation; Appointments and Schedules; Organization and Administration; Health Services Administration

Results Point of Contact

• Title: Dr. Cyndy Long
• Organization: Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research

Long_C@palmer.edu

563-884-5157

Study Officials

• Ian Coulter, Ph.D

  RAND

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

• PI is Sponsor Employee: No
• Restrictive Agreement: No

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: INVESTIGATOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: June 12, 2014
• First Posted: June 20, 2014
• Study Start: August 1, 2014
• Primary Completion: June 1, 2016
• Study Completion: June 1, 2016
• Last Updated: April 19, 2019
• Results First Posted: April 19, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Locations

US (1)