The Permacol Dutch Cohort Study
1 other identifier
observational
77
1 country
24
Brief Summary
Incisional hernia is the most frequently seen long term complication in surgery causing much morbidity and even mortality in patients. Despite studies on the optimal closing technique for laparotomies, the risk for incisional hernia after midline incision remains about 5-20 %. It has been established that implementing a mesh reduces recurrence of the incisional hernia but still the results of repair are often disappointing. Incisional hernias can become increasingly complex due to complicated abdominal wall defects caused by a disturbed anatomy, fistulas, burst abdomen, wound and mesh infections. In these cases it is not save to repair the incisional hernia by means of a synthetic mesh and other augmentation tools need to be implemented. In the recent years the use of biological meshes has been gaining popularity. Recent reports of the use of collagen-based prosthesis have suggested that they support new vessel growth, do not excite a significant foreign body reaction, form fewer adhesions, are well incorporated into host tissues with minimal wound contraction, and can be used in grossly contaminated wounds with fewer infective complications. Biologic meshes are harvested from a source tissue and processed for medical use but they vary widely in their processing methods. They include tissues of human or animal origins, both chemically cross-linked and non cross-linked processes, and submucosal, pericardial, or dermal tissue sources. Current studies investigating the effectiveness of these meshes are small and have short periods of follow-up. These shortcomings can be explained to high cost of the meshes and unclear indication when to use a biological mesh. The aim of this study is investigate the short and long term effects of the Permacol© biological mesh. Also the investigators will be inquiring why a biologic mesh was used, what is the true indication to use a biological mesh.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2013
24 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2014
CompletedApril 7, 2017
April 1, 2017
7 months
June 10, 2014
April 5, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incisional Hernia recurrence
This parameter will be assessed by taking a history of the patient and assessing operation room reports.
One and two year after initial operation
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Mesh explantations
Anytime after abdominal wall reconstruction with Permacol until two years after operation
Postoperative complications
All postoperative complications are assessed until two years after initial operation
Additional "abdominal wall repair" operations
After initial abdominal wall reconstruction with Permacol until two years after initial operation
Indication of Permacol usage
Perioperatively
Quality of Life
A year or longer after initial abdominal wall reconstruction until two years after initial operation
Study Arms (1)
Permacol mesh placement
No intervention performed
Interventions
All patients were treated for a complex abdominal wall hernia by implantation of Permacol mesh. This intervention took place before patients were included in the cohort.
Eligibility Criteria
The design of the trial will be a cross sectional cohort study. We will be gathering information from all the centers in the Netherlands who have used the Permacol© mesh in the past to treat complicated abdominal wall defects. Patients will be asked to return to the hospitals outpatient clinic. A total of around 70 patients will be included into the study.
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent
- Complicated abdominal wall hernia repair
- Permacol© mesh implantation
You may not qualify if:
- No signed informed consent
- Operation other than Complicated abdominal wall hernia repair
- Implant other than Permacol© mesh implantation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Centerlead
- Amphia, Breda, the Netherlandscollaborator
- Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhovencollaborator
- Franciscus, Roosendaal, the Netherlandscollaborator
- Groene Hart, Gouda, the Netherlandscollaborator
- Havenziekenhuiscollaborator
- Lievensberg, Bergen op Zoom, the Netherlandscollaborator
- Medical Center Haaglandencollaborator
- MC Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlandscollaborator
- Meander MC, Amersfoort, the Netherlandscollaborator
- Maastricht University Medical Centercollaborator
- Nij Smellinghe, Drachten, the Netherlandscollaborator
- OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlandscollaborator
- Orbis MC, Sittard, the Netherlandscollaborator
- Reinier de Graaf Groepcollaborator
- Rijnstate, Arnhem, the Netherlandscollaborator
- Spaarne ziekenhuis, Hoofddorp, the Netherlandscollaborator
- Tergooi ziekenhuizen, Hilversum, the Netherlandscollaborator
- The Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospitalcollaborator
- UMC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlandscollaborator
- UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlandscollaborator
- VieCuri, Venlo, the Netherlandscollaborator
- Waterland, Purmerend, the Netherlandscollaborator
- Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlandscollaborator
Study Sites (24)
Meander MC
Amersfoort, Netherlands
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Rijnstate
Arnhem, Netherlands
Lievensberg
Bergen op Zoom, Netherlands
Amphia
Breda, Netherlands
Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis
Delft, Netherlands
Nij Smellinghe
Drachten, Netherlands
Catharina
Eindhoven, Netherlands
Groene Hart
Gouda, Netherlands
UMC Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands
Atrium MC
Heerlen, Netherlands
Tergooi ziekenhuizen
Hilversum, Netherlands
Spaarne ziekenhuis
Hoofddorp, Netherlands
MC Leeuwarden
Leeuwarden, Netherlands
MUMC+
Maastricht, Netherlands
Waterland
Purmerend, Netherlands
Franciscus
Roosendaal, Netherlands
Erasmus University Medical Center
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Havenziekenhuis
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Orbis MC
Sittard, Netherlands
MC Haaglanden
The Hague, Netherlands
TweeSteden
Tilburg, Netherlands
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, Netherlands
VieCuri
Venlo, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Kaufmann R, Timmermans L, van Loon YT, Vroemen JPAM, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Repair of complex abdominal wall hernias with a cross-linked porcine acellular matrix: cross-sectional results of a Dutch cohort study. Int J Surg. 2019 May;65:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
PMID: 30946996DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ruth Kaufmann, MD
Erasmus Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2014
First Posted
June 18, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
November 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share