NCT02164292

Brief Summary

The possibility to achieve a curative resection in patients with liver malignancies is limited by the future liver remnant (FLR). The Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) approach has recently been introduced as a revolutionary strategy to achieve resectability by inducing a rapid and large FLR hypertrophy. However, the possibility of achieving a short-term hypertrophy and high resectability rates has been counteracted in most published series by an increased risk of morbidity and mortality.The aim of this study was to evaluate the results with the ALPPS procedure in a single high-volume HPB center, with special emphasis in the safety and feasibility of this new 2-stage strategy. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety, feasibility and efficacy of ALPPS in a single high-volume hepatobiliary center.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2011

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2011

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 11, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 16, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

August 13, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

June 11, 2014

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Liver tumorALPPSTwo-stage hepatectomyMorbidityHypertrophy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Safety of the procedure defined as the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality

    Ocurrence of any postoperative complication or mortality considering the Dindo-Clavien classification of surgical complications

    within the first 90 days after the first stage

  • Feasibility of the procedure defined as percentage of patients that complete both surgical stages.

    Percentage of patients that finally arrive to the 2nd stage of the ALPPS approach

    within 4 months after the first stage

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Efficacy of the procedure defiend as the percentage of patients who achieve a sufficient future liver remnant hypertrophy

    within 10 days after the first stage

  • Disease-free survival and overall survival

    1 and 2 years

  • Risk factors for morbidity

    within 3 month after the first stage

  • Risk factors for a reduced kinetic growth rate of the future liver remnant (<35 cc/day)

    within 3 months after the first stage

Study Arms (1)

ALPPS group

Patients with small future liver remnant who are operated with the "Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy" approach

Procedure: ALPPS

Interventions

ALPPSPROCEDURE

Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy

ALPPS group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

High-Volume University Hospital population

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with marginally resectable or primarily non-resectable locally advanced liver tumors
  • Insufficient FLR either in volume or quality

You may not qualify if:

  • Unresectable liver metastases in the future liver remnant or unresectable extrahepatic metastases
  • Severe portal hypertension
  • High anesthesiological risk
  • Unresectable primary tumor

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1181ACH, Argentina

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Agrawal S, Belghiti J. Oncologic resection for malignant tumors of the liver. Ann Surg. 2011 Apr;253(4):656-65. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fc08ca.

    PMID: 21475004BACKGROUND
  • Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML, Graf R. Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1545-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra065156. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17429086BACKGROUND
  • Mise Y, Sakamoto Y, Ishizawa T, Kaneko J, Aoki T, Hasegawa K, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N. A worldwide survey of the current daily practice in liver surgery. Liver Cancer. 2013 Jan;2(1):55-66. doi: 10.1159/000346225.

    PMID: 24159597BACKGROUND
  • Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H, Nadalin S, Baumgart J, Farkas SA, Fichtner-Feigl S, Lorf T, Goralcyk A, Horbelt R, Kroemer A, Loss M, Rummele P, Scherer MN, Padberg W, Konigsrainer A, Lang H, Obed A, Schlitt HJ. Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):405-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824856f5.

    PMID: 22330038BACKGROUND
  • de Santibanes E, Clavien PA. Playing Play-Doh to prevent postoperative liver failure: the "ALPPS" approach. Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):415-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318248577d. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22330039BACKGROUND
  • Shindoh J, Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, Curley SA, Huang SY, Mahvash A, Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Aloia TA. Analysis of the efficacy of portal vein embolization for patients with extensive liver malignancy and very low future liver remnant volume, including a comparison with the associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jul;217(1):126-33; discussion 133-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Apr 28.

    PMID: 23632095BACKGROUND
  • Schadde E, Ardiles V, Slankamenac K, Tschuor C, Sergeant G, Amacker N, Baumgart J, Croome K, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Lang H, de Santibanes E, Clavien PA. ALPPS offers a better chance of complete resection in patients with primarily unresectable liver tumors compared with conventional-staged hepatectomies: results of a multicenter analysis. World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1510-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2513-3.

    PMID: 24748319BACKGROUND
  • Torres OJ, Fernandes Ede S, Oliveira CV, Lima CX, Waechter FL, Moraes-Junior JM, Linhares MM, Pinto RD, Herman P, Machado MA. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): the Brazilian experience. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2013 Jan-Mar;26(1):40-3. doi: 10.1590/s0102-67202013000100009. English, Portuguese.

    PMID: 23702869BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, HepatocellularHypertrophy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteDigestive System DiseasesLiver DiseasesPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Eduardo de Santibañes, MD, PhD

    General Surgery Service, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. Argentina

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2014

First Posted

June 16, 2014

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion

April 1, 2014

Study Completion

April 1, 2014

Last Updated

August 13, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Locations