Repair of Large Incisional Hernias - To Drain or Not to Drain Randomised Clinical Trial
Comparative Study Between the Use of Tubular Drains in Closed Suction System and the Use of Progressive Tension Sutures in Prevention of Infection and Seromas After Surgical Repair of Large Incisional Hernias
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to perform a randomised clinical trial comparing the use of closed-suction tubular drains and progressive tension sutures in individuals with large incisional hernias subjected to onlay mesh repair to evaluate the occurrence of seroma and surgical wound infection after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started May 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2014
CompletedJune 13, 2014
June 1, 2014
8 months
June 10, 2014
June 11, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Seroma
Clinical and/or radiological diagnosis of seroma until 1 month
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Infection
1 month
Other Outcomes (1)
hernia recurrence
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Drain
EXPERIMENTALIn group 1(Drain), a 4.8 mm diameter continuous closed-suction tubular drain : was placed between the aponeurosis and the subcutaneous tissue caudally to the incision.
Progressive Tension Sutures
EXPERIMENTALDrains were not used in group 2, but separate absorbable polyglactin 920 2/0 sutures were placed from the subcutaneous mesh to the aponeurosis every 2 cm by means of the progressive tension suture (or Quilting Sutures) technique, as described by Pollock et al
Interventions
In group 1, a 4.8 mm diameter continuous closed-suction tubular drain (Medsharp Ind.Com.Prod.Hosp.Ltda - reg. MS (Ministério da Saúde \[Health Ministry registry\]): 80267170001) was placed between the aponeurosis and the subcutaneous tissue caudally to the incision.
Drains were not used in group 2, but separate absorbable polyglactin 920 2/0 sutures were placed from the subcutaneous mesh to the aponeurosis every 2 cm by means of the progressive tension suture (or Quilting Sutures) technique, as described by Pollock et al
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals with primary or recurrent incisional hernia were assessed at HUOP, and those with longitudinal or transverse ventral hernia secondary to a previous surgical incision, measuring 5 to 15 cm after dissection of the hernial sac and classified as large or very large according to Chevrel's classification, were considered to be eligible.
- In individuals with multiple defects, the length between the cranial margin of the most cranial defect and the caudal margin of the most caudal defect was considered
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals subjected to emergency surgery, with infection
- Immunosuppressed
- Younger than 18 or older than 80 years old
- ASA III or IV, with a serum albumin concentration lower than 3.0 g/dl or who refused participation were excluded from the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Western Paraná State University / Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Cascavel, Paraná, 85811-060, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andre P Westphalen, MD
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2014
First Posted
June 13, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
June 13, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-06