3D Multi-Contrast Atherosclerosis Characterization of the Carotid Artery
2 other identifiers
observational
134
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a technical development study with the goal to develop 3D techniques for atherosclerosis plaque characterization. We hypothesize that 3D MRI is superior to 2D MRI in characterizing major plaque constituents that contribute to severe clinical events such as myocardial infarction or stroke. The major advantages of the 3D techniques to be developed will include high spatial resolution, reduced scan times, and optimized image contrast. The use of contrast injection is not needed with the new techniques, which is greatly beneficial for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.This is not a funded clinical trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2014
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 24, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 25, 2022
CompletedFebruary 15, 2024
February 1, 2024
7.8 years
June 10, 2014
February 13, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Image quality score
Images collected from both investigational MRI pulse sequences and conventional protocol will be reviewed and scored by readers and compared.
Within one year of scans
Adverse plaque characteristics detection
In patient study, the analysis of adverse plaque characteristics will be performed and compared between the conventional protocol and developed protocol.
Within one year of scans
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Image contrast-to-noise ratio
Within one year of scans
Study Arms (2)
Healthy Volunteers
100 healthy volunteers will take MRI with/without contrast using both conventional protocol and our developed protocol. Image quality and image contrast will be compared between the two protocols.
Patients with Carotid Artery Disease
40 patients will take MRI with/without contrast using both conventional protocol and our developed protocol. Image quality, image contrast, and composition analysis will be compared between the protocols.
Interventions
Bilateral carotid plaque imaging at 3.0T. Conventional MRI scans with T1-, T2-weightings and scans using the developed techniques. MR contrast may be used in conventional protocol when it is needed to evaluate the performance of the developed techniques
Eligibility Criteria
100 healthy volunteers and 40 patients with carotid artery disease will be recruited for this technical development study.
You may qualify if:
- Healthy Volunteers: male or female ≥ 18 years of age with a BMI\<30, with no history of cardiovascular disease
- Patients: Medically stable, male or female ≥ 18 years of age diagnosed with an atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid artery who have not undergone stenting of the carotid artery to be imaged.
- Ability to read and understand informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to MRI including mechanically, magnetically, or electrically activated implants, ferromagnetic implants and ferromagnetic foreign bodies, pregnancy.
- Inability to tolerate MRI secondary to an inability to lie supine or severe claustrophobia.
- Non-compliant with visit instructions, including inability to lie still, hold breath or follow procedure instructions
- Severe allergy to animal dander or animal-instigated asthma
- Specific to gadolinium-based contrast agents: Renal function test does not meet CSMC standard of care MRI contrast protocol requirements (GFR \<45ml/min) or previous allergic reaction to gadolinium-based contrast agents.\*
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Centerlead
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)collaborator
- American Heart Associationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Debiao Li, PhD
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Biomedical Imaging Research Institute
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2014
First Posted
June 13, 2014
Study Start
June 24, 2014
Primary Completion
April 25, 2022
Study Completion
April 25, 2022
Last Updated
February 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02