NCT02163408

Brief Summary

This is a technical development study with the goal to develop 3D techniques for atherosclerosis plaque characterization. We hypothesize that 3D MRI is superior to 2D MRI in characterizing major plaque constituents that contribute to severe clinical events such as myocardial infarction or stroke. The major advantages of the 3D techniques to be developed will include high spatial resolution, reduced scan times, and optimized image contrast. The use of contrast injection is not needed with the new techniques, which is greatly beneficial for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.This is not a funded clinical trial.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
134

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2014

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 10, 2014

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 13, 2014

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 24, 2014

Completed
7.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 25, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 25, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 15, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7.8 years

First QC Date

June 10, 2014

Last Update Submit

February 13, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

MRIPlaque Characterization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Image quality score

    Images collected from both investigational MRI pulse sequences and conventional protocol will be reviewed and scored by readers and compared.

    Within one year of scans

  • Adverse plaque characteristics detection

    In patient study, the analysis of adverse plaque characteristics will be performed and compared between the conventional protocol and developed protocol.

    Within one year of scans

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Image contrast-to-noise ratio

    Within one year of scans

Study Arms (2)

Healthy Volunteers

100 healthy volunteers will take MRI with/without contrast using both conventional protocol and our developed protocol. Image quality and image contrast will be compared between the two protocols.

Other: MRI with/without contrast

Patients with Carotid Artery Disease

40 patients will take MRI with/without contrast using both conventional protocol and our developed protocol. Image quality, image contrast, and composition analysis will be compared between the protocols.

Interventions

Bilateral carotid plaque imaging at 3.0T. Conventional MRI scans with T1-, T2-weightings and scans using the developed techniques. MR contrast may be used in conventional protocol when it is needed to evaluate the performance of the developed techniques

Healthy Volunteers

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

100 healthy volunteers and 40 patients with carotid artery disease will be recruited for this technical development study.

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy Volunteers: male or female ≥ 18 years of age with a BMI\<30, with no history of cardiovascular disease
  • Patients: Medically stable, male or female ≥ 18 years of age diagnosed with an atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid artery who have not undergone stenting of the carotid artery to be imaged.
  • Ability to read and understand informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindications to MRI including mechanically, magnetically, or electrically activated implants, ferromagnetic implants and ferromagnetic foreign bodies, pregnancy.
  • Inability to tolerate MRI secondary to an inability to lie supine or severe claustrophobia.
  • Non-compliant with visit instructions, including inability to lie still, hold breath or follow procedure instructions
  • Severe allergy to animal dander or animal-instigated asthma
  • Specific to gadolinium-based contrast agents: Renal function test does not meet CSMC standard of care MRI contrast protocol requirements (GFR \<45ml/min) or previous allergic reaction to gadolinium-based contrast agents.\*

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carotid Artery Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Debiao Li, PhD

    Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director, Biomedical Imaging Research Institute

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2014

First Posted

June 13, 2014

Study Start

June 24, 2014

Primary Completion

April 25, 2022

Study Completion

April 25, 2022

Last Updated

February 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Locations