Low Dose Aspirin for Venous Leg Ulcers
Aspirin4VLU
1 other identifier
interventional
251
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Venous leg ulcers (VLU) are the most common leg ulcer, can be painful, and limit work, lifestyles and activity, especially in older patients. There are few effective treatments - compression therapy (tight bandaging or stockings) helps healing, but about half the people with a VLU remain unhealed even after 12 weeks of treatment. Research suggests taking aspirin as well as using compression may speed up healing for VLU, but the current evidence is not enough to change clinical practice. We will conduct a randomised controlled trial to test whether using low dose aspirin (150 mg daily or placebo) really does speed up healing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Mar 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 4, 2019
CompletedJanuary 4, 2019
December 1, 2018
2.1 years
June 5, 2014
November 14, 2018
December 10, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to Complete Healing of Reference Ulcer
Time to event (complete healing defined as intact skin with absence of scab)
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of Participants With Healed Venous Leg Ulcers
24 weeks
Change in Estimated Ulcer Area
Baseline, 24 weeks
Change in Health-related Quality of Life (Short Form 36)
Baseline, 24 weeks
Change in Health-related Quality of Life (EuroQol-5D 3L)
Baseline, 24 weeks
Change in Health-related Quality of Life (Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire)
24 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Aspirin
EXPERIMENTAL150 mg capsule once daily for up to 24 weeks
Inert capsule
PLACEBO COMPARATORMatching capsule once daily for up to 24 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 years or older
- Determined to have a venous leg ulcer (clinical indications of venous ulceration, Ankle Brachial Index ≥ 0.8, and other causative aetiologies ruled out)
- Able to tolerate compression therapy
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Confirmation with participant's general practitioner that the participant can take low dose aspirin or placebo.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- History of myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, angina or significant peripheral arterial disease
- History of adverse effects related to aspirin use
- Currently using aspirin, or other anti-platelet or anticoagulant therapy
- Opinion of screening medical practitioner at National Institute of Health Innovation that participant has an existing condition or treatment that is a contraindication to use of aspirin or to participation in the trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Jull A, Wadham A, Bullen C, Parag V, Kerse N, Waters J. Low-dose aspirin as an adjuvant treatment for venous leg ulceration: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (Aspirin4VLU). J Adv Nurs. 2016 Mar;72(3):669-79. doi: 10.1111/jan.12864. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
PMID: 26708314BACKGROUNDJull A, Wadham A, Bullen C, Parag V, Kerse N, Waters J. Low dose aspirin as adjuvant treatment for venous leg ulceration: pragmatic, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial (Aspirin4VLU). BMJ. 2017 Nov 24;359:j5157. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5157.
PMID: 29175902DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Recruitment was lower than anticipated as fewer aspirin-naive patients being available than estimated. However we had 82% power to observe the anticipated difference if assumptions had been correct.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Professor Andrew Jull
- Organization
- University of Auckland
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Jull, RN PhD
School of Nursing, University of Auckland
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Identical placebo with only difference being unique code on bottle containing product.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2014
First Posted
June 9, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 31, 2017
Study Completion
March 31, 2017
Last Updated
January 4, 2019
Results First Posted
January 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- No limitations to timeframe
- Access Criteria
- We have a plan to share individual participant data with other aspirin for VLU triallists. All other requests for de-identified individual participant data or study documents will be considered where the proposed use aligns with public good purposes, does not conflict with other requests, or planned use by the Trial Steering Committee, and the requestor is willing to sign a data access agreement.
We have a plan to share individual participant data with other aspirin for VLU triallists. All other requests for de-identified individual participant data or study documents will be considered where the proposed use aligns with public good purposes, does not conflict with other requests, or planned use by the Trial Steering Committee, and the requestor is willing to sign a data access agreement.