NCT02158039

Brief Summary

Cystic tumors of the pancreas are fluid-filled growths. They are often treated by surgical removal. A safe and effective non-surgical treatment is desirable. Ethanol (alcohol) injection may treat cysts by killing the lining cells of the cyst, and is an accepted treatment for cysts of other organs. In this study, participants with pancreatic cysts underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided ethanol injection of pancreatic cysts. This was a pilot study to assess safety and efficacy. The hypotheses of this study were 1) complications of EUS guided ethanol injection requiring hospitalization will occur in \<10% of subjects, and 2) EUS guided ethanol injection, with retreatment as necessary, will ablate at least 50% of pancreatic cysts.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
33

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2004

Longer than P75 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2004

Completed
9.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 30, 2013

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 6, 2014

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 29, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

11.3 years

First QC Date

September 30, 2013

Results QC Date

December 22, 2015

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Intraductal Papillary Mucinous NeoplasmMucinous Cystic NeoplasmEndoscopic UltrasoundEthanol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    Adverse events include pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, any other occurrence resulting in hospitalization, medical treatment, surgery, death, or disability

    1 year after final treatment

  • Number of Subjects With Complete or Partial Ablation of the Treated Cyst

    Complete or partial ablation of cysts will be defined by the presence of a persistent cystic structure, and its volume and maximum diameter, as determined by cross-sectional imaging studies (CT, MR)

    1 year after final treatment

Study Arms (1)

Pancreatic Cyst Ethanol Injection

EXPERIMENTAL

EUS-guided lavage of a pancreatic cyst with ethanol solution. The ethanol solution was diluted to 80% using normal saline. Final solution also contained 1% lidocaine except in patients allergic to local anesthetics. The ethanol solution was injected into pancreatic cysts at a volume equal to 90% of the aspirated cyst volume. In subjects undergoing re-treatment of a cyst, ethanol was diluted to 90% using normal saline, and injected in a volume equal to 100% of the aspirated cyst volume.

Drug: EthanolDrug: Lidocaine

Interventions

EUS-guided lavage of a pancreatic cystic neoplasm with ethanol solution. Ethanol was diluted to 80% using normal saline.

Pancreatic Cyst Ethanol Injection

The final solution contained 1% lidocaine except in subjects allergic to local anesthetics.

Pancreatic Cyst Ethanol Injection

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Presence of a pancreatic cystic lesion, \> 1 cm in maximum diameter
  • Treatment of the cystic lesion is desired due to symptoms or concern for subsequent malignancy
  • Age \> or = 18 years
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Surgical treatment has been considered, and a surgical consultation offered to the patient, but:
  • Subject's cyst does not meet consensus criteria for surgical resection, or
  • Subject is deemed a poor operative candidate, or
  • Ethanol ablation would allow a subtotal rather than total pancreatectomy, or
  • Subject has decided not to undergo surgical treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known or suspected pregnancy, or nursing
  • History of pancreatitis within past 3 months
  • Main pancreatic duct is dilated to \> 4mm in neck, body, or tail
  • Cyst is known to communicate with the pancreatic duct
  • Cyst has a primarily microcystic architecture on EUS
  • Cyst is immediately adjacent to the main pancreatic duct on EUS
  • Cyst has a connection to the main pancreatic duct seen during EUS
  • During initial cyst aspiration, more fluid is recovered than expected (suggesting communication to the main pancreatic duct)
  • Pancreatic cytology has demonstrated cancer

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Gomez V, Takahashi N, Levy MJ, McGee KP, Jones A, Huang Y, Chari ST, Clain JE, Gleeson FC, Pearson RK, Petersen BT, Rajan E, Vege SS, Topazian MD. EUS-guided ethanol lavage does not reliably ablate pancreatic cystic neoplasms (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):914-20. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.069. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

    PMID: 26363331BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous

Interventions

EthanolLidocaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsAcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesAniline CompoundsAmines

Limitations and Caveats

Sample size was small, and a control group was not included. Neither cyst histology not degree of epithelial ablation was assessed by surgical resection in any of the study participants.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Mark Topazian
Organization
Mayo Clinic

Study Officials

  • Mark Topazian, MD

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2013

First Posted

June 6, 2014

Study Start

June 1, 2004

Primary Completion

September 1, 2015

Study Completion

September 1, 2015

Last Updated

February 5, 2018

Results First Posted

January 29, 2016

Record last verified: 2017-07

Locations