Optimization of the TB Treatment Regimen Cascade
OneRIF
1 other identifier
interventional
701
1 country
1
Brief Summary
\- Hypothesis: Double dose rifampicin together with earlier monitoring of sputum conversion using vital staining reduces unfavorable outcome of Cat. 1 first-line TB treatment without excess serious toxicity, and allows early switch to specific treatment of MDR-TB without using Cat. 2 retreatment regimen \- General study design: This open label, randomised clinical trial is intended as a pilot study on the efficacy and safety of high-dose rifampicin and feasibility and added value of auramine and/or FDA vital staining sputum smear after 2 weeks of intensive treatment phase. If this proof-of-concept study provides substantial indication of benefit without indication of excess toxicity, the data from the study will be used to design a larger scale, cluster-randomized study. The aim of this cluster randomised study would be to provide definite proof of the benefit of the intervention on adverse treatment outcomes and lack of excess toxicity associated with high dose rifampicin. In addition, the cluster-randomized study would provide a more precise assessment of the suppression and prevention of (acquired) resistance endpoints. An interim analysis is thus planned at the time the last recruited patient finishes treatment, i.e. about 9 months after the end of recruitment. It will focus on assessment of drug toxicity versus suggested benefits of the intervention. This analysis will be primarily performed for the go/no-go decision and design considerations for the cluster-randomized trial. The decision on proceeding to the cluster randomized study will be based on the absence of excess toxicity, a trend toward a reduction of unfavourable outcomes (excluding relapse), and possible favourable effects on initially present low-resistance mutations / mutations acquired during treatment. It will also allow to adapt the design of the larger study particularly regarding the algorithm for resistance screening, and whether or not treatment shortening could be justified with rapid initial conversion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Nov 2014
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 26, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 13, 2020
CompletedFebruary 13, 2020
February 1, 2020
2.8 years
May 26, 2014
January 15, 2020
February 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Tuberculose Treatment Outcome
Following current WHO guidelines, an adverse treatment outcome is defined as any occurrence of the following: * Relapse: Cured previously from TB or completed treatment for TB and now having bacteriologically positive sputum for TB (at 12 months follow-up or at an earlier time point) * Default: The patient whose treatment was interrupted for ≥ 2 consecutive months. * Failure: Sputum positive for TB at 5 months or later during treatment. In line with current WHO recommendations, patients detected with MDR-TB or rifampicin resistance before this or another outcome applies and switched to the MDR-TB regimen will be excluded from the outcome analysis.18 Failure will also be declared if the regimen has to be changed for at least 2 drugs due to adverse events. * Death: All-cause mortality between case registration and end of TB treatment (related or not to TB or TB treatment)
12 months after end of treatment
Number of Participants Who Develop Liver Toxicity
Grade 3-4 Liver Toxicity following NIH common toxicity criteria (CTC), including transaminase increases to \>5-20 ULN (grade 3), or \> 20 ULN (grade 4)
until month eight
Secondary Outcomes (7)
High-level Rifampicin Resistant TB Adverse Treatment Outcomes
12 months after end of TB treatment
Number of Initial Resistant TB Cases Who Switched to MDR-TB Treatment or Were Cured
at two weeks of treatment
the Negative Predictive Value of Conversion at 2 Weeks for Relapse.
at 2 weeks of treatment
Proportion of Acquired Rifampicin Resistance Among Failures and Relapses
12 months after end of TB treatment
Area Under the Curve of Auramine Resp. FDA at 2 Weeks to Predict Adverse Treatment Outcome at 1 Year After Treatment Completion
Auramine/FDA at 2 weeks and adverse treatment outcome 1 year after treatment completion
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard TB treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard regimen for TB treatment according to guidelines of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
double rimfampicin
EXPERIMENTAL2HREZ/4HR Cat. 1, modified by using double dose rifampicin throughout
Interventions
Compared to standard regimen dosing of rifampicin is doubled, while standard dose isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol are maintained
Standard regimen for TB treatment according to guidelines of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with smear-positive pulmonary TB
- years or older
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- contacts of MDR-TB patients and other MDR-TB suspects diagnosed with resistance on rapid DST for rifampicin performed prior to start of treatment according to NTP guidelines
- smear-negative pulmonary and extra-pulmonary TB cases
- patients in need of hospitalization because of very bad general condition or complications
- patients with clinically active liver disease, for the study defined as jaundice confirmed by a local Medical Officer (Government)
- any known HIV-positive patient (although none are expected)
- any patient with known hepatitis B or C infection
- pregnant women; in addition, patients in the intervention arm who become pregnant during treatment will be switched to the control arm
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Damien Foundationlead
- National TB control Programme Bangladeshcollaborator
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgiumcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Damien Foundation Bangladesh TB project in Greater Mymensingh district (8 selected clinics)
Dhaka, Greater Mymensingh District, Bangladesh
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Trials Unit ITM
- Organization
- Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aung Kya Jai Maug, MD
Damien Foundation Bangladesh
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2014
First Posted
June 3, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2017
Study Completion
August 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 13, 2020
Results First Posted
February 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02