iMAP2
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Two Pertussis-containing Vaccines in Pregnancy and Vaccine Responses in UK Mothers and Their Infants
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
366
1 country
3
Study Start
October 2014
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
June 2017
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 2017
Actual (reported)Due to an unexpectedly high number of infant deaths from whooping cough in 2012, the Department of Health acted to protect newborns between birth and completion of primary immunisations, the period with greatest risk of disease. Vaccination of pregnant women with whooping cough vaccine in the third trimester of pregnancy was instigated nationally, so that antibodies produced by the Mum would cross the placenta to the unborn child, giving them passive protection at the most vulnerable time. This antibody transfer has been known for some time but has not been compared between the two whooping cough vaccines being used in pregnancy. Any effect the raised antibody might have on infant responses to the vaccines given in the first few months of life has also not been measured. This is particularly important as the infant immunisations include some of the same components as the whooping cough vaccines, which include diphtheria, tetanus and polio. Previous studies have shown that high levels of antibody prior to vaccination may affect subsequent antibody responses. It is therefore important to assess whether administration of the whooping cough vaccine in pregnancy adversely affects the protection afforded by the infant vaccines, particularly to those which are similar, namely tetanus and diphtheria as well as meningitis C and Hib vaccines which include diptheria and tetanus components in their structures. This study will assess immune responses of mothers and their babies (\~200 pairs) to their vaccinations and will allow the comparison of two whooping cough vaccines being used in pregnancy. This will be done by taking small amounts of blood, which is the only way to measure antibody levels (the proxy of the immune response), before and after the vaccinations. A group of unvaccinated women and their babies (50 pairs) will also be recruited to allow comparison of their immune responses.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
December 2017
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
May 13, 2014
Actual (reported)May 23, 2014
Actual (reported)October 2014
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
June 2017
Actual (reported)December 2017
Actual (reported)PT immunogenicity (IgG GMC)
To compare antiPertussis Toxin (PT) IgG responses following primary immunisation with an acellular pertussiscontaining vaccine in infants born to mothers who received REPEVAX in pregnancy compared to infants whose mothers received BOOSTRIXIPV in pregnancy.
Birth, 2, 5 and 13 months of age
Immunogenicity of pertussis antigens (IgG GMC)
To compare antibody responses to pertussis antigens (concentration of IgG antibody to PT, pertactin (PRN), filamentous haemagglutinnin (FHA) and fimbrial antigens 2 and 3 (FIM 2 and 3\]), tetanus toxoid and diphtheria toxoid at birth amongst infants born to mothers who received REPEVAX in pregnancy compared to infants whose mothers received BOOSTRIXIPV in pregnancy
Birth, 2, 5 and 13 months of age
Immunogenicity of infant immunisations - pertussis antigens, meningococcal serogroup C, pnuemococcal vaccines at 2, 5 and 13 months of age, (all IgG GMC and SBA GMT for MenC)
To compare antibody responses to pertussis antigens \[IgG to PT, PRN, FHA and FIM 2 and 3\], Hib antigen \[PRP\], tetanus toxoid and diphtheria toxoid; meningococcal serogroup C serum bactericidal antibody titres and meningococcal serogroup Cspecific IgG concentrations; 13 serotypespecific pneumococcal IgG concentrations and functional pneumococcal antibody studies at 2, 5 and 13 months of age (just before and one month after primary immunization and one month after booster vaccines) in infants born to mothers who received REPEVAX in pregnancy compared to infants whose mothers received BOOSTRIXIPV in pregnancy and compared to infants whose mothers who did not receive pertussis vaccination in pregnancy
Birth, 2, 5 and 13 months of age
immunogenicity of pnuemococcal conjugate vaccine
birth, 2, 5 13 months
immunogenicity of meningococcal conjugate vaccine
birth, 2, 5, 13 months
immunogenicity of diphtheria vaccine
borth 2, 5, 13 months
Repevax in pregnancy
Boostrix-IPV in pregnancy
unvaccinated mothers
vaccine
vaccine
Gloucestershire
Gloucestershire, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
Hertfordshire
Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
St George's Vaccine Institute
London, United Kingdom
Grassly NC, Andrews N, Cooper G, Stephens L, Waight P, Jones CE, Heath PT, Calvert A, Southern J, Martin J, Miller E. Effect of maternal immunisation with multivalent vaccines containing inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) on infant IPV immune response: A phase 4, multi-centre randomised trial. Vaccine. 2023 Feb 10;41(7):1299-1302. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.035. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
Jones CE, Calvert A, Southern J, Matheson M, Andrews N, Khalil A, Cuthbertson H, Hallis B, England A, Heath PT, Miller E. A phase IV, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial comparing two pertussis-containing vaccines in pregnant women in England and vaccine responses in their infants. BMC Med. 2021 Jun 8;19(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02005-5.
Elizabeth Coates, PhD
Public Health England
366 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
May 13, 2014
First Posted
May 23, 2014
Study Start
October 2014
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
June 2017
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 2017
Actual (reported)Last Updated
October 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2018-08
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: