Custom Molded Foot Orthoses Effect on Foot Kinematics and Lower Extremity Electromyography During Walking and Running.
SOLE
The Effect of Two Different Custom Molded Foot Orthoses on Inter-segmental Foot Kinematics and the EMG Activity of Selected Lower Leg Muscles During Walking and Running.
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of two types of in-shoe custom made orthotics in altering the motion of the foot and muscle activity of select muscles of the lower leg in individuals experiencing lower extremity symptoms of a non traumatic origin. We hypothesized that orthotics would decrease the extent of motion of the during walking and running when compared to a barefoot condition. The investigators further hypothesized that orthotics would decrease the amount of muscle activity seen during walking and running when compared to barefoot walking.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 30, 2015
CompletedMay 18, 2015
April 1, 2015
7 months
May 19, 2014
May 21, 2014
April 29, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Maximum Rearfoot Eversion Motion During Stance
The rearfoot eversion motion during the stance phase of walking with the subject wearing a sandal and their assigned orthotic (Full Contact or Maximal Arch Subtalar Stabilization) was recorded 5 weeks post receiving their assigned orthotic. The stance phase of walking was divided into 4 subphases (Phase 1: 0 to 17%, Phase 2: 18 to 50%, Phase 3: 51 to 83%, and Phase 3: 84 to 100% of stance) and the maximum rearfoot eversion during each subphase determined.
Absolute values measured at 5 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Maximum Electromyographic Activity of Lower Leg Muscles
Absolute values measured at 5 weeks
Maximum Forefoot Inversion During Stance
Absolute values measured at 5 weeks
Maximum First Ray Complex Plantarflexion During Stance
Absolute values measured at 5 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Full Contact Orthosis
EXPERIMENTALFull Contact Orthosis
Maximal Arch Subtalar Stabilization
EXPERIMENTALMaximal Arch Subtalar Stabilization Orthoses
Interventions
Custom made semi-rigid thermoplastic heel cup extending to the base of the metatarsals with a full foot length 3.0mm thick EVA and ultra-suede top cover
The Full Contact orthosis is constructed from a 5/32" blue polypropylene with posting material comprised of white polypropylene.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must have complaints of lower extremity or foot pain of a non-traumatic, mechanical origin.
- Subjects must have at least 60 degrees of frontal plane forefoot on rearfoot passive range of motion (as determined by a modified Gib test in the symptomatic lower extremity.
- Subjects must be able to walk independently on a treadmill at a speed of 4.8 kmh.
- Subjects must have been referred by a health care professional for an orthosis fitting.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects having less than 60 degrees of forefoot on rearfoot frontal plane passive range of motion.
- Subjects having a history of a fracture of the foot or ankle.
- Subjects having any previous illness, surgery or other characteristic (e.g., cardiovascular, musculoskeletal or neuromuscular problems) that would affect their lower extremity function or ability to walk independently.
- Subjects having knee, lower leg or foot pain of a non-mechanical nature.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Quinnipiac Universitylead
- Sole Supports, Inccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Motion Analysis Laboratory, Quinnipiac Unviersity
Hamden, Connecticut, 06518, United States
Related Publications (1)
Garbalosa JC, Elliott B, Feinn R, Wedge R. The effect of orthotics on intersegmental foot kinematics and the EMG activity of select lower leg muscles. Foot (Edinb). 2015 Dec;25(4):206-14. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
PMID: 26362236DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Juan C Garbalosa, PT, PhD, Director Motion Analysis Laboratory
- Organization
- Quinnipiac University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juan C Garbalosa, PT, PhD
Quinnipiac University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Motion Analysis Laboratory, Clinical Associate Proffessor of Physical Therapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2014
First Posted
May 21, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2009
Study Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 18, 2015
Results First Posted
April 30, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04