Global Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Women With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-associated Pain
Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain
2 other identifiers
interventional
496
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
A randomized study evaluating the continued safety and efficacy of elagolix in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis associated pain in adult pre-menopausal women who completed 6 months treatment in pivotal Study M12-671 (NCT01931670).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2014
Typical duration for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 27, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 22, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 23, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 7, 2018
CompletedJuly 13, 2021
July 1, 2021
2.1 years
May 19, 2014
August 9, 2018
July 9, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dysmenorrhea at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment
Response was defined as a reduction of -0.85 or more from baseline in dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a \< 15% increase in average rescue analgesic pill count and no additional analgesic). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-671. Participants recorded rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain daily and dysmenorrhea and its impact on daily activities each day of their period in an electronic diary (e-Diary). Dysmenorrhea was assessed according to the following: * 0: No discomfort * 1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. Analgesic use and pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit.
Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and Month 6
Percentage of Participants With a Response for Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment
Response was defined as a reduction of -0.43 or greater from baseline for non-menstrual pelvic pain as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a \< 15% increase in average pill count of rescue analgesics and no additional analgesics). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-671. Participants recorded rescue analgesic medication for endometriosis-associated pain and assessed non-menstrual pelvic pain and its impact on their daily activities each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0: No discomfort * 1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. Pain scores and analgesic use were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit.
Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and Month 6
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dysmenorrhea at Each Month Based on Daily Assessment
Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Percentage of Participants With a Response for Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain at Each Month Based on Daily Assessment
Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dyspareunia at Each Month Based on Daily Assessment
Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Based on Daily Assessment
Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Based on Daily Assessment
Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Elagolix 150 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received elagolix 150 mg tablets once a day (QD) for 6 months.
Elagolix 200 mg BID
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received elagolix 200 mg tablets twice a day (BID) for 6 months.
Interventions
Elagolix tablets administered orally
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject has completed the 6-Month Treatment Period in pivotal study M12-671.
- Agrees to use required birth control methods during the study through Month 6 of the Post-treatment Follow-up period
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically significant gynecological condition
- Bone mineral density (BMD) loss greater than or equal to 8 percent in the spine, femoral neck or total hip
- Plans to become pregnant in the next 18 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AbbVielead
Related Publications (6)
Surrey E, Taylor HS, Giudice L, Lessey BA, Abrao MS, Archer DF, Diamond MP, Johnson NP, Watts NB, Gallagher JC, Simon JA, Carr BR, Dmowski WP, Leyland N, Singh SS, Rechberger T, Agarwal SK, Duan WR, Schwefel B, Thomas JW, Peloso PM, Ng J, Soliman AM, Chwalisz K. Long-Term Outcomes of Elagolix in Women With Endometriosis: Results From Two Extension Studies. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):147-160. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002675.
PMID: 29889764BACKGROUNDBeck D, Winzenborg I, Liu M, Degner J, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Shebley M. Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Apr;61(4):577-587. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01096-w. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
PMID: 34878624DERIVEDStodtmann S, Nader A, Polepally AR, Suleiman AA, Winzenborg I, Noertersheuser P, Ng J, Mostafa NM, Shebley M. Validation of a quantitative systems pharmacology model of calcium homeostasis using elagolix Phase 3 clinical trial data in women with endometriosis. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul;14(4):1611-1619. doi: 10.1111/cts.13040. Epub 2021 May 7.
PMID: 33963686DERIVEDAbbas Suleiman A, Nader A, Winzenborg I, Beck D, Polepally AR, Ng J, Noertersheuser P, Mostafa NM. Exposure-Safety Analyses Identify Predictors of Change in Bone Mineral Density and Support Elagolix Labeling for Endometriosis-Associated Pain. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;9(11):639-648. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12560. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
PMID: 32945631DERIVEDWinzenborg I, Polepally AR, Nader A, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Ng J. Effect of Elagolix Exposure on Clinical Efficacy End Points in Phase III Trials in Women With Endometriosis-Associated Pain: An Application of Markov Model. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;9(8):466-475. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12545. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
PMID: 32621325DERIVEDWinzenborg I, Nader A, Polepally AR, Liu M, Degner J, Klein CE, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Ng J. Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Healthy Women and Women with Endometriosis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Oct;57(10):1295-1306. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0629-6.
PMID: 29476499DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Global Medical Services
- Organization
- AbbVie
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
AbbVie Inc.
AbbVie
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2014
First Posted
May 21, 2014
Study Start
May 27, 2014
Primary Completion
June 22, 2016
Study Completion
May 23, 2017
Last Updated
July 13, 2021
Results First Posted
September 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2021-07