Comparative Analysis Between Bipolar Device and Conventional Tie & Suture Technique in Thyroidectomy
Comparative Analysis Between A Bipolar Vessel Sealing and Cutting Device and the Tie and Suture Technique in Thyroidectomy: A Two Institution Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
160
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
Bipolar sealing and cutting devices such as EnSeal® G2 Tissue Sealer are surgical instruments that use electrical powered diathermic energy to seal and transect tissue. These devices have shown high efficiency in a wide variety of open and laparoscopic general and gynecological surgical procedures. The surgical performance of the EnSeal® has shown to be comparable to that of ultrasonic cutting devices in several studies. However, the efficacy of this instrument and in particular of new instruments such as the EnSeal® G2 Tissue Sealer has not been evaluated in thyroid surgery. Our primary aim is to verify whether the EnSeal® performance is superior to the standard surgical technique for thyroidectomy in a randomized clinical trial on 2 different institutions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2014
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2015
CompletedMay 28, 2014
May 1, 2014
1 year
May 9, 2014
May 27, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Operative time and surgical safety
The primary outcomes will be operative time (minutes), blood loss (milliliters), transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism (calcium and PTH levels), loss of signal in laryngeal nerve monitoring, number of ligatures and pain intensity (EVA score).
One year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Surgical complications
one year
Study Arms (2)
Thyroid Goiter
EXPERIMENTALBenign thyroid disease with a nodule equal or lesser than 4 cm in diameter of any gender or ethnical origin. Half of these patients will undergo either bipolar or conventional thyroidectomy.
Papillary Thyroid Cancer
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients of any gender or ethnical origin with papillary thyroid cancer no greater than 4 cm in diameter. Half of these patients will undergo either bipolar or conventional thyroidectomy.
Interventions
This device will be used in half of the patients with thyroid goiter and half of the patients with papillary thyroid cancer.
Tie and suture technique. This device will be used in half of the patients with thyroid goiter and half of the patients with papillary thyroid cancer.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with thyroid diseases amenable of surgical resection
- Benign or malign thyroid disease
- Thyroid nodules ≤ 4cm
- Patients with any gender or ethnical origin
- Adults patients with 18-65 years-old
- Postoperative follow-up of at least 2 weeks
- Patients competent to understand and sign the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with clinical or biochemical hyperthyroidism
- Preoperative indication for lateral lymph node dissection (radical modified)
- Presence of gross tracheal or laryngeal invasion with thyroid cancer
- Preoperative vocal cord paralysis or laryngeal disease
- Patients with bleeding disorders or using anticoagulants
- Patients with advanced or undifferentiated thyroid cancer
- Patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism or parathyroid disease
- Patients who do not want to accept to participate in the study
- Elimination Criteria:
- Intraoperative indication of lateral lymph node dissection (radical modified)
- Intraoperative requirement of any tracheal or laryngeal resection
- Malfunction of the devices (EnSeal or neuro-monitoring)
- Any intraoperative conditions of the patient that require to stop or modified the surgery
- Incomplete records, laboratories or clinical follow-up
- Patients from vulnerable populations or non-competent to understand or sign the informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiranlead
- University of Sao Paulocollaborator
- Ethicon Endo-Surgerycollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Hospital Das Clinicas, Universidad de Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-010, Brazil
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
Mexico City, Mexico City, 14000, Mexico
Related Publications (3)
Janssen PF, Brolmann HA, Huirne JA. Effectiveness of electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing devices versus other electrothermal and ultrasonic devices for abdominal surgical hemostasis: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2892-901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2276-6. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
PMID: 22538684BACKGROUNDPerson B, Vivas DA, Ruiz D, Talcott M, Coad JE, Wexner SD. Comparison of four energy-based vascular sealing and cutting instruments: A porcine model. Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):534-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9619-8. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
PMID: 18097720BACKGROUNDNewcomb WL, Hope WW, Schmelzer TM, Heath JJ, Norton HJ, Lincourt AE, Heniford BT, Iannitti DA. Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):90-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9932-x. Epub 2008 May 16.
PMID: 18483824BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Miguel F Herrrera, MD PhD
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Erivelto Volpi, MD
Universidad de Sao Paulo
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2014
First Posted
May 16, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
July 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 28, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05