Study Stopped
non-compliance with the protocol. Arrest requested by the Monitoring Safety committee
Automated Administration of Fluids Guided by Dynamic Parameters and Cardiac Output During General Anesthesia
Closed Loop
Automated Administration of Intravenous Fluids Guided by Dynamic Parameters and Cardiac Output During General Anesthesia: a Pilot Feasibility Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to demonstrate that the LIR (Learning Intravenous Resuscitator) Closed-Loop Fluid Administration System (hereafter the "LIR system"), a new device for the automated administration of intravenous fluids during major abominal surgery and which allows the reinjection of 250 ml of saline filling (crystalloid or colloid), maintains blood volume at values that are acceptable by the "gold standard", i.e. the anesthetist in charge of the patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Nov 2014
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 13, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 17, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 28, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 28, 2016
CompletedNovember 17, 2025
January 1, 2018
2.1 years
May 13, 2014
November 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The percentage of fluid (crystalloid or colloid) administration changes per patient performed by the LIR system and approved / accepted by the participating anesthetist.
A change may be non-validated in the following two situations: 1. Stopping criteria when using the LIR system: * malfunction of the device * malfunction of the electric syringe (Agilia, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) * an abnormality of cardiac output measurement or appearance of a limitation to the use of pulse pressure variation (cardiac arrhythmia, spontaneous ventilation, tidal volume \<7 ml / kg of theoretical ideal weight). 2. Non-validation criteria for fluid administration despite a positive indication by the LIR device: If the answer to the two following questions are both yes, preventing the LIR device from acting is not theoretically justified, and the anesthesiologist must justify stopping the device and record the reason for his/her non-validation of the administration of fluid therapy. * The last fill increased cardiac output more than 15%? yes/no * The prediction parameter for filling response (pulse pressure variation) indicates vascular filling? yes/no
Day 0, just after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (38)
The number of fluid administration modifications (cristalloid or colloid) performed by the device
Day 0, just after surgery
The number of times the anesthetist in charge of the patient had to intervene with the fluid administration (cristalloid or colloid) system/device.
Day 0, just after surgery
The total volume of HEA and crystalloid infused during the preload optimizations and cardiac output
Day 0, just after surgery
The total amount of crystalloid administered for basic inputs during surgery
Day 0, just after surgery
The total amount of intravenous fluids administered during surgery
Day 0, just after surgery
- +33 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
The study population
EXPERIMENTALSee inclusion/exclusion criteria. Intervention: LIR
Interventions
The usual patient pathways and recommendations concerning vascular filling remain strictly unchanged in this study. The only thing that differs from usual care is the use of the LIR system to automatically optimize fluid resuscitation during general anesthesia, with continuous supervision by the anesthesiologist present during the entire period of use of the device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient will receive general anesthesia for a surgical procedure with the following characteristics: ----- planned abdominal surgery by laparotomy or laparoscopy with a probable duration\> 2 hours ----- invasive monitoring of blood pressure ----- administration of crystalloid and colloid (HEA PM \<150 kDa)
You may not qualify if:
- The patient is participating in another study
- The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
- The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
- The patient has a contraindication for a treatment used in this study: ----- Contraindications to the administration of HES MW \<150 kDa ----- Patient classified NYHA\> 2 ----- Allergy to HEA
- The patient has a pacemaker
- Surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass
- Surgery on the skull
- Dementia
- Patients with brain pathology (tumor, stroke, Parkinson's disease, ...)
- Patients with a psychiatric disorder, severe depression or psychosis, as well as those receiving antipsychotic treatment
- Limitations concerning the use of respiratory pulse pressure variation: cardiac arrhythmia, spontaneous ventilation, using a volume flow \<7 ml / kg
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
CHRU de Montpellier - Hôpital Saint-Eloi
Montpellier, 34295, France
CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, 30029, France
Related Publications (1)
Gricourt Y, Prin Derre C, Demattei C, Bertran S, Louart B, Muller L, Simon N, Lefrant JY, Cuvillon P, Jaber S, Roger C. A Pilot Study Assessing a Closed-Loop System for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Abdominal Surgery Patients. J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 30;12(9):1409. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091409.
PMID: 36143194RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jean-Yves Lefrant, MD, PhD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claire Roger, MD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2014
First Posted
May 15, 2014
Study Start
November 17, 2014
Primary Completion
December 28, 2016
Study Completion
December 28, 2016
Last Updated
November 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2018-01