Study Stopped
Due to changes in scanning procedure, and infeasible biopsy and baseline imaging, the trial closed for poor accrual and inability to follow patients.
Trial Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy to Radiofrequency Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma
A Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy to Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)
2 other identifiers
interventional
4
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will assess whether Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) can provide comparable local control, with similar or improved toxicity rates compared to Radio Frequency Ablation (RFA) when treating small renal cell carcinomas.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 7, 2017
CompletedNovember 7, 2017
October 1, 2017
2.6 years
April 16, 2014
October 11, 2017
October 11, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Proportion of Patients With Local Control of Disease
On imaging, local control will be defined as when the treated lesion shows no enhancement.
12 months
Cumulative Incidence of Grade 2 and Greater Toxicities
The number of patients reporting grade 2 and greater toxicities (for this trial the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events or CTCAE was used).
up to 30 days after the last study treatment
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Difference in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores Between SBRT and RFA Treatment Arms
Pre-study, last day of treatment; 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months post treatment
Difference in Patient Time Away (Measured in Days) Between SBRT and RFA Treatment Arms
Pre-study, last day of treatment; 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months post treatment
Metastasis Free Survival Time
36 months post treatment
Overall Survival Time
36 months post treatment
Difference in Incidence of Treatment Related Pain Between SBRT and RFA Treatment Arms
Pre-study, last day of treatment; 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months post treatment
Study Arms (3)
Randomized SBRT
EXPERIMENTALPatients who meet eligibility criteria (unilateral primary renal cell carcinoma less than 4 cm in greatest diameter) and are randomized to Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) will receive SBRT delivered in fractions of 20 Gy, approximately every other day, for a total of three treatments. If the target is deemed too close to organs at risk, 5 fractions of up to 10 Gy per fraction will be prescribed.
Randomized RFA
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who meet eligibility criteria (unilateral primary renal cell carcinoma less than 4 cm in greatest diameter) and are randomized to Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) will receive RFA.
Non-Randomized SBRT
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with renal cell carcinoma's greater than or equal to 4 cm in diameter, and up to 8 cm in diameter, may be placed in the non-randomized stereotactic body radiation therapy arm. Patients with tumors not amenable to RFA, those with metastatic disease, and those who elect a noninvasive means of treatment will also be eligible to receive treatment in the non-randomized SBRT cohort.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with renal cell carcinoma less than 4 cm in maximum diameter, who are poor surgical candidates are eligible for randomization between SBRT and RFA (Renal cell carcinoma must be pathologically proven).
- The primary tumor must be in a location amendable to RFA within the kidney.
- Patients must be appropriate candidates for RFA, with platelets ≥50,000/mm3 and an international normalized ratio of 1.5.
- Patients must have an ECOG (a measurement of general well being and activities of daily living; scores range from 0 to 5 where 0 represents perfect health) score ≤ 3.
- There is no required minimum renal function (patients will be counseled about the possible need for dialysis, if applicable, just as would be the case for radical or partial nephrectomy).
- Patients must sign an informed consent form approved for this purpose by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Michigan Medical Center indicating that they are aware of the investigational aspects of the treatment and the potential risks.
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent.
- If a patient is randomized to the RFA arm, but is deemed not to be an anesthesia candidate, he/she will be placed in the non-randomized SBRT cohort.
- Patients with renal cell carcinoma less than 8 cm in maximum diameter, patients with metastatic RCC who require local palliation or are progressing through systemic disease, patients who are poor surgical candidates and have tumor location not amenable to RFA, or patients who would prefer a noninvasive means of treatment are eligible for the non-randomized SBRT cohort (Renal cell carcinoma must be pathologically proven).
- There are no limitations based on location of the primary tumor within the kidney.
- Patients must have an ECOG score ≤ 3.
- There is no required minimum renal function (patients will be counseled about the possible need for dialysis, if applicable, just as would be the case for radical or partial nephrectomy).
- Patients must sign an informed consent form approved for this purpose by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Michigan Medical Center indicating that they are aware of the investigational aspects of the treatment and the potential risks.
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients younger than 18 or pregnant women.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Michigan Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Daniel Spratt, M.D.
- Organization
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Spratt, M.D.
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2014
First Posted
May 14, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 7, 2017
Results First Posted
November 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10