Preparing to Run Effective Prevention
PREP
1 other identifier
interventional
990
1 country
15
Brief Summary
Young people can engage in a variety of negative behaviors-such as drug use, underage drinking, and premarital sex-that exact a high toll on local communities. These activities are often the target of community-based prevention efforts. Getting To Outcomes (GTO) is an approach that includes a toolkit, technical assistance, and training, organized around a 10-step process, that helps communities plan, implement, and evaluate the impact of their programs that attempt to prevent these negative behaviors. This study will examine the degree to which Getting To Outcomes helps Boys and Girls Clubs implement an evidence based drug prevention program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 12, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2018
CompletedNovember 8, 2018
November 1, 2018
4.4 years
May 6, 2014
November 7, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Drug use
initiation and past month prevalence of alcohol use, marijuana use, perceptions of their friends' use of alcohol and marijuana, and resistance self-efficacy
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Fidelity
Each site will implement the 5 sessions of Project Choice twice (one time a year, for two years). In each year, we will collect fidelity data on two of the five sessions, for a total of 4 sessions rated over the two year period, for each site.
Capacity
Annually for the first four years
Study Arms (2)
Project CHOICE + Getting To Outcomes
EXPERIMENTALBoys and Girls Club sites will receive a) training and materials for Project CHOICE and b) training, ongoing technical assistance for two years, and materials for Getting To Outcomes
Project CHOICE only
ACTIVE COMPARATORBoys and Girls Club sites will receive a) training and materials for Project CHOICE
Interventions
These sites will receive written materials, training, and on site technical assistance to use the Getting To Outcomes process to implement Project CHOICE at their sites.
Sites will receive standard training for Project CHOICE.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 10-14 and attends a participating boys and girls club
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than 10, older than 14, does not attend a participating boys and girls club
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- RANDlead
Study Sites (15)
BGC of Buena Park
Buena Park, California, 90620, United States
BGC of Burbank and Greater E Valley
Burbank, California, 91504, United States
BGC of Carson
Carson, California, 90810, United States
BGC of South Bay
Harbor City, California, 90710, United States
BGC of East LA
Los Angeles, California, 90022, United States
Challengers Boys and Girls Club
Los Angeles, California, 90037, United States
Salesian BGC
Los Angeles, California, 90063, United States
BGC of Santa Monica
Los Angeles, California, 90401, United States
BGC of West Valley
Los Angeles, California, 91303, United States
East Valley Boys and Girls Club
Los Angeles, California, 91744, United States
BGC of Santa Ana
Los Angeles, California, 92703, United States
BGC of LA Harbor
San Pedro, California, 90731, United States
BGC Stanton
Stanton, California, 90680, United States
BGC of Westminster
Westminster, California, 92683, United States
BGC of Whittier
Whittier, California, 90602, United States
Related Publications (4)
Acosta J, Chinman M, Ebener PA, Malone PS, Cannon JS, D'Amico EJ. Sustaining an Evidence-Based Program Over Time: Moderators of Sustainability and the Role of the Getting to Outcomes(R) Implementation Support Intervention. Prev Sci. 2020 Aug;21(6):807-819. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01118-2.
PMID: 32323166DERIVEDHerman PM, Chinman M, Cannon J, Ebener P, Malone PS, Acosta J, D'Amico EJ. Cost Analysis of a Randomized Trial of Getting to Outcomes Implementation Support of CHOICE in Boys and Girls Clubs in Southern California. Prev Sci. 2020 Feb;21(2):245-255. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01082-6.
PMID: 31865544DERIVEDCannon JS, Gilbert M, Ebener P, Malone PS, Reardon CM, Acosta J, Chinman M. Influence of an Implementation Support Intervention on Barriers and Facilitators to Delivery of a Substance Use Prevention Program. Prev Sci. 2019 Nov;20(8):1200-1210. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01037-x.
PMID: 31473932DERIVEDChinman M, Ebener P, Malone PS, Cannon J, D'Amico EJ, Acosta J. Testing implementation support for evidence-based programs in community settings: a replication cluster-randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes(R). Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 22;13(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0825-7.
PMID: 30348227DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Chinman, PhD
RAND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2014
First Posted
May 12, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 1, 2018
Last Updated
November 8, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11