Outcome of TKA Using Customized Cutting Block Compared With Conventional Intramedullary Cutting Guide
Comparison of Customized Cutting Block (Visionaire™) and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Customized cutting block and conventional cutting guide are both effective in improving accuracy and function of OA knee patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 knee-osteoarthritis
Started Oct 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedJuly 29, 2016
July 1, 2016
1.6 years
November 25, 2013
July 28, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mechanical Axis Alignment (Absolute Value Measured in Degrees) Using 3 Feet Long Leg Films
Femoral Valgus Angle, Tibial varus angle, Tibial slope, Femoral Flexsion/Extension angle, Implant Rotation
3 Months Post-operative
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Intraoperative Bleeding
Intra-operative
Operative time
During the procedure
Blood volume in suction drain
Post-operative Day 2
Hemoglobin level
Post-operative day1, 2, 3
WOMAC score
6 weeks
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
WOMAC Score
2 years
Study Arms (2)
Standard knee cutting guides
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard cutting guides use traditional instrumentation to determine knee implant positions. During surgery, a rod is placed in the leg bone and the cutting guide is attached to that rod.
Patient specific cutting guides
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient specific cutting guides are custom-made for each patient based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Before surgery, MRI of the knee is done and used to create a cutting guide that is formed to the exact shape of the knee. The patient specific cutting guides have platforms that can be attached to the bone, so the rod does not need to be placed in the leg bone.
Interventions
Patient specific cutting guides are custom-made for each patient based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Before surgery, MRI of the knee is done and used to create a cutting guide that is formed to the exact shape of the knee. The patient specific cutting guides have platforms that can be attached to the bone, so the rod does not need to be placed in the leg bone.
Standard cutting guides use traditional instrumentation to determine knee implant positions. During surgery, a rod is placed in the leg bone and the cutting guide is attached to that rod.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 60-90
- Diagnosis of osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis of the knee and qualify for surgery, as indicated by one of the following:
- Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis where one or more compartments are involved;
- Correction of varus or valgus.
- Willing to participate and return for follow-up study visits.
You may not qualify if:
- Vascular insufficiency
- Previous deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
- Previous osteotomy
- Previous patella fracture or surgery
- Previous healed tibia or femur fractures
- Previous joint replacement surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Thammasat University Hospital.
Pathum Thani, Changwat Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Phonthakorn Panichkul, MD
Thammasat University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Phonthakorn Panichkul
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2013
First Posted
May 1, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07