NCT02128464

Brief Summary

Customized cutting block and conventional cutting guide are both effective in improving accuracy and function of OA knee patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
108

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2012

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 25, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

July 29, 2016

Status Verified

July 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

November 25, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Knee OsteoarthritisTotal Knee ArthroplastyCustomized Cutting BlockConventional Intramedullary Cutting Guide

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mechanical Axis Alignment (Absolute Value Measured in Degrees) Using 3 Feet Long Leg Films

    Femoral Valgus Angle, Tibial varus angle, Tibial slope, Femoral Flexsion/Extension angle, Implant Rotation

    3 Months Post-operative

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Intraoperative Bleeding

    Intra-operative

  • Operative time

    During the procedure

  • Blood volume in suction drain

    Post-operative Day 2

  • Hemoglobin level

    Post-operative day1, 2, 3

  • WOMAC score

    6 weeks

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • WOMAC Score

    2 years

Study Arms (2)

Standard knee cutting guides

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard cutting guides use traditional instrumentation to determine knee implant positions. During surgery, a rod is placed in the leg bone and the cutting guide is attached to that rod.

Procedure: Standard knee cutting guides

Patient specific cutting guides

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patient specific cutting guides are custom-made for each patient based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Before surgery, MRI of the knee is done and used to create a cutting guide that is formed to the exact shape of the knee. The patient specific cutting guides have platforms that can be attached to the bone, so the rod does not need to be placed in the leg bone.

Procedure: Patient specific cutting guides

Interventions

Patient specific cutting guides are custom-made for each patient based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Before surgery, MRI of the knee is done and used to create a cutting guide that is formed to the exact shape of the knee. The patient specific cutting guides have platforms that can be attached to the bone, so the rod does not need to be placed in the leg bone.

Patient specific cutting guides

Standard cutting guides use traditional instrumentation to determine knee implant positions. During surgery, a rod is placed in the leg bone and the cutting guide is attached to that rod.

Standard knee cutting guides

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 60-90
  • Diagnosis of osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis of the knee and qualify for surgery, as indicated by one of the following:
  • Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis where one or more compartments are involved;
  • Correction of varus or valgus.
  • Willing to participate and return for follow-up study visits.

You may not qualify if:

  • Vascular insufficiency
  • Previous deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
  • Previous osteotomy
  • Previous patella fracture or surgery
  • Previous healed tibia or femur fractures
  • Previous joint replacement surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Thammasat University Hospital.

Pathum Thani, Changwat Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Phonthakorn Panichkul, MD

    Thammasat University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Phonthakorn Panichkul

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2013

First Posted

May 1, 2014

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion

May 1, 2014

Study Completion

May 1, 2014

Last Updated

July 29, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-07

Locations