IVUS Controlled Stenting
Expansion of Intracoronary Stents by Low Pressure Oversizing Versus High Pressure Inflation: A Randomised Intracoronary Ultrasound Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stent placement is now widely accepted to improve the results of angioplasty (an operation to widen the blood vessel) and decreasing the need for further surgery. Despite their worldwide acceptance, stent usage is still limited by renarrowing which occurs within the stent (restenosis) in some patients within the first six months. In addition there still exists a small risk of heart attacks soon after the stent is placed. The purpose of this study is to test the safety and tolerability of trying to place the stents using a different strategy of using low pressure oversized balloon inflations as opposed to the usual high pressure balloon inflations. This may reduce injury to the artery and reduce the chance of renarrowing of the stent. In order to ensure this is a safe and effective way of performing the procedure the investigators intend to use an Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) catheter to look from inside the artery at the stents. IVUS has proven to be the best way of ensuring optimal stent placement. Primary hypothesis: Stents will be equally well expanded and apposed using a strategy of oversized stenting at normal inflation pressures ( \< 10 atmospheres ) as compared to high pressure inflation (≥14 atmospheres) as guided by intravascular ultrasound imaging. Secondary Hypothesis: There will be no difference in acute clinical endpoints (death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularisation or stent thrombosis) using a strategy of oversized stenting at normal inflation pressure as compared to high pressure inflation. Tertiary Hypothesis: If the above is shown to be true the investigators would hope to expand the study in order to reveal a decrease in stent restenosis using a strategy of lower pressure balloon inflations. The investigators will assess the deployment characteristics of drug eluting versus bare metal stents
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 17, 2016
October 1, 2016
2.7 years
April 28, 2014
October 14, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of stents which are optimally deployed as assessed against the MUSIC criteria
The criteria for optimal stent expansion are: 1\. Complete apposition of the stent over its entire length against the vessel wall. 2a. In stent minimal luminal area (MLA) \>= 90% of the average reference luminal area or \>=100% of lumen area of the reference segment with the lowest lumen area. In stent lumen area of proximal stent entrance \>= 90% of proximal lumen area. 2b. Where the instent luminal area is in excess of 9.0 mm2 , the following criteria apply: In stent MLA \> 80% of the average reference lumen area or \>=90% of lumen area of the reference segment with the lowest lumen area. In stent lumen area of proximal stent entrance \>= 90% of proximal lumen area. 3. Symmetric stent expansion defined by lumen diameter (LD)min / LD max \>= 0.7 A less rigorous criteria for stent expansion will also be assessed: 1. In stent MLA \> 80% of the average reference lumen area; \& 2. Complete apposition of the stent over its entire length against the vessel wall
Immediately after stent is deployed until optimal deployment is achieved
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Clinical endpoints including death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, repeat percutaneous intervention, stent thrombosis, myonecrosis
1-3 days following procedure and at 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Stent oversize group
ACTIVE COMPARATOROversized stent deployed at low pressure: A stent premounted on a balloon with a nominal diameter halfway between the lumen diameter and the true vessel diameter (approximated by external elastic lamina) as assessed by IVUS. This will be based on the smallest of the vessel reference diameters proximal and distal to the lesion. In addition the vessel diameter must be greater than this diameter throughout the length of the lesion. This stent will be implanted at an inflation pressure of 10 atmospheres or less for at least 15 seconds and a second IVUS will be performed to assess the end point.
High pressure group
ACTIVE COMPARATORStent deployed at high pressure: A stent premounted on a balloon with a nominal diameter approximately equal to the vessel segment lumen reference diameter as previously assessed by IVUS will be used. This stent will be implanted at an inflation pressure of 14 atmospheres or more for at least 15 seconds and a second IVUS will be performed to assess the end point
Interventions
Stent can include both bare metal stents and drug eluting stents. Depending on availabilities, different stent brands may be used.
Stent can include both bare metal stents and drug eluting stents. Depending on availabilities, different stent brands may be used.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are scheduled for a coronary angioplasty and stenting
- Single de novo artery stenosis are eligible for this study
- Target lesion needs to be less than 30mm long and located in a vessel more than 2.5 mm in diameter
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to antiplatelet therapy;
- Ostial lesion;
- Excessive vessel tortuosity;
- Lesion at a significant bifurcation (subbranch ≥ 2mm in diameter);
- Suspected intracoronary thrombus.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Cardiology
Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170, Australia
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Craig Juergens, Cardiologist
South West Sydney, Liverpool
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Medical Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2014
First Posted
May 1, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 17, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10