Long Term Safety and Efficacy Study of Calcitriol 3 mcg/g Ointment in Pediatric Subjects With Plaque Psoriasis
A Multicenter Open Label Uncontrolled Study of the Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Calcitriol 3 mcg/g Ointment Applied Twice Daily for 26 Weeks in Pediatric Subjects (2 to 16 Years and 11 mo of Age) With Mild to Moderate Plaque Psoriasis
1 other identifier
interventional
54
5 countries
16
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of up to 26 weeks of treatment with calcitriol 3 mcg/g ointment when used twice daily, without occlusion, to treat pediatric subjects (2 to 16 years and 11 months of age) with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started May 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_4
16 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 29, 2019
CompletedFebruary 18, 2021
December 1, 2019
4 years
March 28, 2014
November 11, 2019
February 16, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (21)
Change From Screening in Serum Albumin Levels at Week 4
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum albumin levels at week 4 were reported.
Screening, Week 4
Change From Screening in Serum Albumin Levels at Week 8
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum albumin levels at week 8 were reported.
Screening, Week 8
Change From Screening in Serum Albumin Levels at Week 12
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum albumin levels at week 12 were reported.
Screening, Week 12
Change From Screening in Serum Albumin Levels at Week 20
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum albumin levels at week 20 were reported.
Screening, Week 20
Change From Screening in Serum Albumin Levels at Week 26
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum albumin levels at week 26 were reported.
Screening, Week 26
Change From Screening in Serum Albumin Levels at Week 30 (Follow-up)
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum albumin levels at week 30 were reported.
Screening, Week 30 (Follow-up)
Change From Screening in Urine Calcium/Creatinine Ratio at Week 12
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in urine calcium/creatinine ratio at week 12 were reported.
Screening, Week 12
Change From Screening in Urine Calcium/Creatinine Ratio at Week 26
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in urine calcium/creatinine ratio at week 26 were reported.
Screening, Week 26
Change From Screening in Urine Calcium/Creatinine Ratio at Week 30 (Follow-up)
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in urine calcium/creatinine ratio at week 30 were reported.
Screening, Week 30 (Follow-up)
Change From Screening in Serum Phosphate Levels at Week 4
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum phosphate levels at week 4 were reported.
Screening, Week 4
Change From Screening in Serum Phosphate Levels at Week 12
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum phosphate levels at week 12 were reported.
Screening, Week 12
Change From Screening in Serum Phosphate Levels at Week 20
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum phosphate levels at week 20 were reported.
Screening, Week 20
Change From Screening in Serum Phosphate Levels at Week 26
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum phosphate levels at week 26 were reported.
Screening, Week 26
Change From Screening in Serum Phosphate Levels at Week 30 (Follow-up)
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum phosphate levels at week 30 were reported.
Screening, Week 30 (Follow-up)
Change From Screening in Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Levels at Week 4
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum PTH levels at week 4 were reported.
Screening, Week 4
Change From Screening in Serum Parathyroid Hormone Levels at Week 8
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum PTH levels at week 8 were reported.
Screening, Week 8
Change From Screening in Serum Parathyroid Hormone Levels at Week 12
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum PTH levels at week 12 were reported.
Screening, Week 12
Change From Screening in Serum Parathyroid Hormone Levels at Week 20
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum PTH levels at week 20 were reported.
Screening, Week 20
Change From Screening in Serum Parathyroid Hormone Levels at Week 26
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum PTH levels at week 26 were reported.
Screening, Week 26
Change From Screening in Serum Parathyroid Hormone Levels at Week 30 (Follow-up)
Change from screening (the last test prior to the first study medication application) in serum PTH levels at week 30 were reported.
Screening, Week 30 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory value), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is defined as an AE with an onset date on or after the first application of the study drug.
Up to Week 30
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Each Visit
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 20, 26 and 30 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline in Pruritus Score at Each Visit
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 20, 26 and 30 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline in Percent (%) Body Surface Area (BSA) at Each Visit
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 20, 26 and 30 (Follow-up)
Study Arms (1)
Calcitriol ointment
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female 2 to 16 years and 11 months of age
- Clinical diagnosis of stable mild to moderate plaque psoriasis
You may not qualify if:
- Other forms of psoriasis
- Hypercalcemia
- Past history of kidney stones
- Vitamin D deficiency
- Other concomitant dermatological disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Galderma R&Dlead
Study Sites (16)
Johnson Dermatology
Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72916, United States
Northwest Arkansas Clinical Trials Center, PLLC
Rogers, Arkansas, 72758, United States
Advanced Skincare Surgery & Medcenter
Burbank, California, 91505, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
Shideler Clinical Research Center
Carmel, Indiana, 46032, United States
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
New York, New York, 10467, United States
Arlington Research Center for Dermatology
Arlington, Texas, 76011, United States
UZ Gent Dermatology Department
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Lynderm Research Inc.
Markham, Ontario, L3P1X2, Canada
CHU Sainte-Justine
Montreal, Quebec, H3T1C5, Canada
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117, Germany
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
Dresden, 01307, Germany
Universitäts-Hautklinik Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Mainz, 55131, Germany
Padova University Hospital
Padua, 35128, Italy
University of Parma
Parma, 43126, Italy
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Operations
- Organization
- Galderma
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Michael Graeber, MD
Galderma R&D, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2014
First Posted
April 29, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2018
Study Completion
May 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 18, 2021
Results First Posted
November 29, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share