NCT02124564

Brief Summary

This study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of Lacosamide (LCM) 200 mg/day to LCM 600 mg/day taken in monotherapy in Japanese subjects who currently have partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization and who are treated with a single Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) with marketing approval in Japan.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2014

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

11 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2014

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 24, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 28, 2014

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 21, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 21, 2017

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 28, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 28, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

April 24, 2014

Results QC Date

November 21, 2018

Last Update Submit

October 24, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

LacosamideEpilepsyFocal, Partial-Onset Seizures with or without secondary generalizationMonotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of Subjects With at Least One Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study

    An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

    From the Titration Period (investigational product is taken) to the End of Study Visit (up to 3.5 years)

  • Number of Subjects Who Withdraw Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Study

    An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

    From the Titration Period (investigational product is taken) to the End of Study Visit (up to 3.5 years)

  • Number of Subjects With at Least One Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study

    A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: * Results in death * Is life-threatening * Requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect * Is as infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics * Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above

    From the Titration Period (investigational product is taken) to the End of Study Visit (up to 3.5 years)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Number of Subjects Remaining Seizure Free for 6 Consecutive Months During the Monotherapy Period

    From the beginning of the Monotherapy Period to the end of the Follow-Up Period (up to 3.1 years until the time of approval granted)

  • Number of Subjects Remaining Seizure Free for 12 Consecutive Months During the Monotherapy Period

    From the beginning of the Monotherapy Period to the end of the Follow-Up Period (up to 3.1 years until the time of approval granted)

  • Percentage of Participants in the Monotherapy Period Without Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AE) or Lack of Efficacy (LOE)

    From the beginning of the Monotherapy Period to the end of the Follow-Up Period (up to 3.1 years until the time of approval granted)

  • Plasma Concentrations of Lacosamide Versus Time Postdose

    From Titration Period up to Week 94

Study Arms (1)

Lacosamide

EXPERIMENTAL

Open-label, single-arm

Drug: Lacosamide

Interventions

Lacosamide (LCM) immediate-release, film-coated tablets at a strength of 50 mg orally administered twice daily in two equally divided doses. * 4-week Titration Period: Starting on LCM 100 mg/day increased by 100 mg/day each week until 400 mg/day dose reached at the beginning of Week 4 . * The AED Withdrawal Period and Monotherapy Period (52- week Evaluation Period plus a Follow Up Period): During the AED Withdrawal and Monotherapy Period, the investigator may increase or decrease the dose of LCM to optimize tolerability and seizure control. The LCM dose may be decreased no lower than 200 mg/day or increased, no faster than 100 mg/day per week, up to 600 mg/day.

Also known as: Vimpat
Lacosamide

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject is male or female and ≥16 years of age
  • Subject has a diagnosis of epilepsy, having experienced unprovoked partial-onset seizures (IA, IB, or IC with clear focal origin) that are classifiable according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Classification of Epileptic Seizures, 1981
  • Subject experiences partial-onset seizures despite appropriately chosen and adequately tried treatment with 1 antiepileptic drug (AED)
  • Subject has been treated for epilepsy with a stable dose of 1 marketed AED The use of benzodiazepines is permitted as rescue therapy for epilepsy. Benzodiazepines may have been used as needed but not more frequently than once per week.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has a history or presence of seizures of other types than partial onset (IA, IB, or IC with clear focal origin)
  • Subject is taking benzodiazepines for a nonepilepsy indication (Exception: Concomitant use of benzodiazepines is allowed if the subject is taking them on a regular basis, has been on a stable dose for at least 1 month prior to Visit 1, and does not require changes in the dosage and administration throughout the study period. However, concomitant use of benzodiazepines on an as needed basis is not permitted.)
  • Female subject who is pregnant or nursing, and/or a woman of childbearing potential who is not surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal or does not practice 1 highly effective method of contraception, unless sexually abstinent, for the duration of the study
  • Female subject of childbearing potential taking enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EI-AEDs: CBZ, phenytoin, barbiturates, primidone, topiramate) who is not surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal or does not practice 1 highly effective method of contraception according to the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation (ie, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethisterone enantate, intrauterine devices, combined injectables, and progestogen implants) with administration of EI-AEDs or does not practice 2 combined methods of contraception (ie, combined hormonal contraception plus barrier method with spermicidal agent), unless sexually abstinent, for the duration of the study
  • Subject has sick sinus syndrome without a pacemaker, or a second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block, or subject has any other clinically relevant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities
  • Subject has a history of convulsive status epilepticus within the last 12 months prior to Visit 1

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (11)

5

Asaka, Japan

Location

1

Hamamatsu, Japan

Location

11

Itami, Japan

Location

6

Kagoshima, Japan

Location

7

Kamakura, Japan

Location

10

Nagoya, Japan

Location

12

Saitama, Japan

Location

8

Sapporo, Japan

Location

13

Shinagawa City, Japan

Location

4

Shizuoka, Japan

Location

9

Toyonaka, Japan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy

Interventions

Lacosamide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetamidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAcetatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic Acids

Results Point of Contact

Title
UCB
Organization
Cares

Study Officials

  • UCB Cares

    +1 844 599 2273 (UCB)

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2014

First Posted

April 28, 2014

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion

November 21, 2017

Study Completion

November 21, 2017

Last Updated

October 28, 2019

Results First Posted

June 28, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-10

Locations