Hawaii Patient Reward And Incentives to Support Empowerment
HI-PRAISE
A Randomized Incentive-Based Diabetes Self-Management Study (Hawaii Patient Reward And Incentives to Support Empowerment Project)
2 other identifiers
interventional
320
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) study is to examine the extent that financial incentives when combined with diabetes evidence-based practices, improve self-management and biometric measures for adult diabetic Medicaid recipients with an HbA1c of ≥ 6.5 at enrollment. The study will also evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the program. Specific Aims:
- 1.Evaluate whether financial incentives for completing American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommended tests, exams, health education, biometric outcome goals, and vaccinations will improve primary biometric outcomes.
- 2.Evaluate whether financial incentives for completing ADA recommended tests, exams, health education, biometric outcome goals, and vaccinations will improve diabetes patients' self-management as assessed by Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure (SDSCA) and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF36v2).
- 3.Evaluate the extent to which financial incentives for healthy behaviors reduce the cost of health care utilization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
Started May 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 15, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 30, 2019
CompletedMarch 15, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.6 years
April 15, 2014
January 25, 2017
February 26, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to the End of Intervention (December 2015)
Changes in Hemoglobin A1c from baseline to end of study. Change = (End of Intervention score - Baseline score)
Baseline to end of intervention - 12 months minimum to 19 months maximum due to rolling enrollment
Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to the End of Intervention (December 2015)
Changes in systolic blood pressure from baseline to end of study. Change = (End of Intervention score - Baseline score)
Baseline to end of intervention - 12 months minimum to 19 months maximum due to rolling enrollment
Changes in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to the End of Intervention (December 2015)
Changes in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to end of study. Change = (End of Intervention score - Baseline score)
Baseline to end of intervention - 12 months minimum to 19 months maximum due to rolling enrollment
Changes in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to the End of Intervention (December 2015)
Changes in total cholesterol from baseline to end of study. Change = (End of Intervention score - Baseline score)
Baseline to end of intervention - 12 months minimum to 19 months maximum due to rolling enrollment
Changes in Triglycerides From Baseline to the End of Intervention (December 2015)
Changes in triglycerides from baseline to end of study. Change = (End of Intervention score - Baseline score)
Baseline to end of intervention - 12 months minimum to 19 months maximum due to rolling enrollment
Changes in LDL From Baseline to the End of Intervention (December 2015)
Changes in LDL from baseline to end of study. Change = (End of Intervention score - Baseline score)
Baseline to end of intervention - 12 months minimum to 19 months maximum due to rolling enrollment
Changes in HDL From Baseline to the End of Intervention (December 2015)
Changes in HDL from baseline to end of study. Change = (End of Intervention score - Baseline score)
Baseline to end of intervention - 12 months minimum to 19 months maximum due to rolling enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Changes in Health Utilization Cost Before and During Intervention - Amount Paid by Service Providers
Before intervention (3 years prior to baseline) and during intervention (2 years from baseline to end of intervention)
Change From Baseline to End of Intervention (December 2015) in General Diet Subscale of The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) Measure
Baseline to end of intervention - 12 months minimum to 19 months maximum due to rolling enrollment
Change From Baseline to End of Intervention (December 2015) in Physical Component Summary Measure of the Short Form (SF-36v2) Health Survey
Baseline to end of intervention - 12 months minimum to 19 months maximum due to rolling enrollment
Study Arms (2)
Financial Incentives Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants (159) in the Incentive Group will: 1) continue to receive usual care; 2) are eligible to receive financial incentives based on completion of recommended ADA benchmarks and achievement of goals that are founded on evidence based guidelines for diabetes; and 3) be compensated for completion of surveys.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants (161) in the Control Group will continue to receive usual care and be compensated for the completion of surveys only. They will not receive financial incentives.
Interventions
This intervention will examine the effects of incentives on improving adult diabetic Medicaid beneficiaries' health outcomes and reducing associated costs through healthy behavior changes in their diabetes self-management. Incentives focus on improving self-management of diabetes, compliance with ADA recommended preventive, treatment and management measures, primary biometric measures of diabetes, and eliminating barriers to a healthy lifestyle
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinically diagnosed with diabetes mellitus
- years of age or older
- Medicaid recipient
- At recruitment has an HbA1c level of ≥ 6.5
- At recruitment is receiving care coordination at Kaiser Permanente Hawaii
You may not qualify if:
- Current pregnancy - gestational diabetes
- End-stage Renal Disease
- Does not speak English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Hawaiilead
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Servicescollaborator
- Hawaii Department of Human Services (DHS)collaborator
- Kaiser Permanentecollaborator
- RTI Internationalcollaborator
- IMPAQ International, LLC.collaborator
- Econometrica, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kaiser Permanente Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813, United States
Related Publications (5)
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), "Health Status: Life Expectancy at Birth, in Health at a Glance 2013: available at http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Health-at-a-Glance-2013.pdf.
BACKGROUNDOffice of Minority Health 2010. Diabetes Data/Statistics. Retrieved from http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/templates/browse.aspx?lvl=3&lvlid=62
BACKGROUNDVolpp KG, Loewenstein G, Troxel AB, Doshi J, Price M, Laskin M, Kimmel SE. A test of financial incentives to improve warfarin adherence. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 23;8:272. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-272.
PMID: 19102784BACKGROUNDMitchell MS, Goodman JM, Alter DA, John LK, Oh PI, Pakosh MT, Faulkner GE. Financial incentives for exercise adherence in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;45(5):658-67. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.017.
PMID: 24139781BACKGROUNDCahill K, Perera R. Competitions and incentives for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub3.
PMID: 18646105BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Loss of Medicaid status led to reduced # of data points analyzed. Unequally spaced intervention period across subjects increased the variability of outcomes. Usual care setting with providers ordering lab tests led to high # of missing test results.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Chuan Chinn
- Organization
- University of Hawaii, Center on Disability Studies
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ritabelle Fernandes, MD
University of Hawaii
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rebecca R. Ozaki, PhD
Unversity of Hawaii - Center on Disability Studies
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2014
First Posted
April 25, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 15, 2019
Results First Posted
January 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers.