Effect of Massage Therapy in a Multisensory Environment for Intellectual Disabilities
MT-MSE
An Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Massage Therapy in a Multisensory Environment for Residents With Severe and Profound Intellectual Disabilities
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of multisensory environment (MSE) and/or massage therapy (MT) in residents with severe and profound intellectual disabilities (ID) who received massage therapy in MSE, activities in MSE alone, massage therapy in usual care environment, or usual care with attention. Since there has not yet been any conclusive evidence to show the clinical efficacy of MT and MSE on relaxation and reducing challenging behaviours, the following null hypotheses are suggested:
- 1.There will not be any differences on reducing heart and respiration rates between MT-MSE, MT, MSE, and usual care only over the 10-week intervention period and a 2-week follow-up.
- 2.There will not be any differences on adaptive behaviours and levels of alertness between MT-MSE, MT, MSE, and control group over the 10-week intervention period and a 2-week follow-up.
- 3.There will not be any differences on frequency and severity of challenging behaviours between MT-MSE, MT, MSE, and control group over the 10-week intervention period and a 2-week follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 23, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2017
CompletedAugust 10, 2017
August 1, 2017
4.2 years
April 16, 2014
August 8, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Behavior Problem Inventory (BPI-01): frequency and severity of challenging behaviours
BPI-01 consists of 49 items with three subscales and has been widely employed in people with intellectual disability who are living in residential settings. This instrument is to evaluate the frequency and severity of challenging behaviours over the past two weeks of each assessment time points. Each item of the scale can be assessed on both frequency and severity of each kind of behaviour. The frequency scale is a 5-point rating scale: 0 - never, 1 - monthly, 2 - weekly, 3 - daily, and 4 - hourly. The severity scale is a 4-point Likert scale, denoted by: 0 - no problem, 1 - a slight problem, 2 - a moderate problem, and 3 - a severe problem. If a resident does not exhibit any behaviour listed in the item, "never" and "no problem" should be rated on that item.
Baseline (at recruitment)
Behavior Problem Inventory (BPI-01)
Behavior Problem Inventory (as described above) will be used to measure the frequency and severity of challenging behaviours by the end of week 5.
5 weeks after intervention started (interim assessment)
Behavior Problem Inventory (BPI-01)
Behavior Problem Inventory (BPI-01) (as described above) will be used to measure the frequency and severity of challenging behaviours by the end of week 10.
10 weeks after intervention started (Post-test 1)
Behavior Problem Inventory (BPI-01)
Behavior Problem Inventory (as described above) will be used to measure the frequency and severity of challenging behaviours by the end of week 12.
12 weeks after intervention started (Post-test 2)
Respiration and Pulse Rate
Relaxation is a state of parasympathetic activation by vagal nerve, and suppressing the activity of sympathetic nervous system. If massage therapy and/or MSE indicate relaxation effect, the physiological parameters, i.e. pulse and respiration rates, are expected to drop to a lower level as compared with baseline readings after the interventions. Respiration rate and heart (pulse) rate will be measured 3 minutes just after the participants attended the intervention sessions. Their average values will be used for outcome analysis.
Baseline (at recruitment)
Respiration and Pulse Rate
Respiration rate and heart (pulse) rate will be measured 3 minutes just after the participants attended the intervention sessions by the end of week 5. Their average values will be used for outcome analysis.
5 weeks after intervention started (interim assessment)
Respiration and Pulse Rate
Respiration rate and heart (pulse) rate will be measured 3 minutes just after the participants attended the intervention sessions by the end of week 10. Their average values will be used for outcome analysis.
10 weeks after intervention started (Post-test 1)
Respiration and Pulse Rate
Respiration rate and heart (pulse) rate will be measured 3 minutes by the end of week 12. Their average values will be used for outcome analysis.
12 weeks after intervention started (Post-test 2)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Alertness Observation Checklist (AOC)
Baseline (At recruitment)
Alertness Observation Checklist (AOC)
5 weeks after intervention started (interim assessment)
Alertness Observation Checklist (AOC)
10 weeks after intervention started (Post-test 1)
Alertness Observation Checklist (AOC)
12 weeks after intervention started (Post-test 2)
Behaviour Checklist (BC)
Baseline (at recruitment)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Multisensory environment
ACTIVE COMPARATORMultisensory environment (MSE): 30 minutes/session, twice a week for 10 weeks
Massage therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORMassage therapy (MT): 15 minutes/session, twice a week for 10 weeks
Control group
OTHERControl group: usual care for 10 weeks, with attention and interactions with the caregivers only.
Massage in multisensory environment
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive 15 minutes massage therapy in multisensory environment (MT-MSE), twice a week for 10 weeks.
Interventions
Participants are staying in multisensory environment (MSE only) for 30 minutes in each session, and twice per week for 10 weeks. An enabler stays with the participant throughout the session.
A trained massage therapist provides 15 minutes massage therapy (MT) to the participants, twice a week for 10 weeks. The massage therapist acts as an enabler.
Usual residential care will be given to these participants. Only attention and social interactions from the enabler will be provided.
Participants receive 15 minutes massage therapy while staying in multisensory environment for 30 minutes, twice a week for 10 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- exhibiting at least one type of challenging behavior
- admitted at least 3 months for long-term care
- being dependent on nursing care and physical assistance in daily activities
- aged 18 to 64 years
You may not qualify if:
- seriously ill or completely bed-rest residents
- having infectious diseases
- frequently discharged to general hospital for acute care
- frequent home or day leave
- having pressure ulcer and/or severe contracture and deformity
- being restless and reluctant to stay in multisensory environment, or receive massage therapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Siu Lam Hospital
Tuenmen, New Territories, Hong Kong
Related Publications (1)
Chan JSL, Chien WT. A randomised controlled trial on evaluation of the clinical efficacy of massage therapy in a multisensory environment for residents with severe and profound intellectual disabilities: a pilot study. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017 Jun;61(6):532-548. doi: 10.1111/jir.12377. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
PMID: 28387017RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wai Tong CHIEN, PhD
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2014
First Posted
April 23, 2014
Study Start
April 15, 2013
Primary Completion
June 30, 2017
Study Completion
July 31, 2017
Last Updated
August 10, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share