Efficacy of Co-administration of an NSAID With a Dopamine Agonist In Healthy Subjects
Study of the Efficacy of Co-administration of an NSAID With a Dopamine Agonist in the Alleviation of Acute Cutaneous Inflammatory Pain in Healthy Subjects
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Findings from the investigator's lab and others' show the involvement of the brain's mesolimbic circuitry in pain perception and evaluation, as well as during the transition from acute to chronic pain states in both humans and animals. Dopamine (DA) is one of the main neurotransmitters in this circuitry, and it is possible it could have an intimate role in pain processing, chronicity, and related anatomical and functional neuroplasticity. In this study, the investigators first need to know if the combination of l-dopa and Naproxen is safe and efficacious in humans with acute pain, and if so, at what doses. For the present study, healthy pain-free participants will be injected with a small bolus of capsaicin subcutaneously to induce acute cutaneous inflammatory pain. Capsaicin is ideal for this study because it causes a characteristic inflammatory response that is almost always accompanied with pain, has a well-validated dose-response curve, and has effects that will go away completely in a few hours after administration, causing no permanent damage to study subjects. Effects of capsaicin will be measured by changes (decreases) from baseline in thermal and tactile thresholds, as well as by verbally reported cutaneous pain levels (on a scale from 0-10). Participants will also be given study medication in the form of a placebo, one drug, or a combination of drugs before capsaicin injection to allow for any analgesic effects to peak before pain onset. For those receiving active medication, they will either receive Naproxen with placebo or the combination of naproxen and l-dopa (the latter of which will be in one of two different doses). This will allow the investigators to investigate (1) whether co-administration of naproxen and l-dopa has analgesic effects in low levels of acute pain in humans, (2) if this combination is pain-alleviating, whether it is equally as or more efficacious than naproxen, which is the clinical standard of treatment, and finally (3) what dose provides the most analgesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started May 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 10, 2014
October 1, 2014
8 months
February 17, 2014
October 9, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
VAS pain scale
1 Day
Study Arms (4)
Control Group
PLACEBO COMPARATOR10 participants will be given two pills: both will be placebos
Standard Treatment / Positive Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10 participants will be given two pills: both will be Naproxen (each pill = 250mg, total dose = 500mg)
Experimental Group #1
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10 participants will be given two pills: one will be Naproxen (250 mg) and the other will be of Sinemet (carbidopa/levodopa 12.5mg/50mg)
Experimental Group #2
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10 participants will be given two pills: one will be Naproxen (250 mg) and the other will be of Sinemet (carbidopa/levodopa 25mg/100mg )
Interventions
Subjects will take one 250mg Naproxen capsule
Subjects will take one 12.5mg/50mg Sinemet.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Must be at least 18 years of age.
- Must be able to communicate (speak and write) in English.
- Must demonstrate that they understand what the study entails and requires of them.
- Must be able to dedicate the amount of time (\~3 hours) to participate in the study.
- History of chronic pain of any kind
- Have a current episode of acute pain of any kind (including stomach ache, headache, muscle ache, etc)
- History of psychiatric illness or brain injury
- History of substance abuse
- History of motor impairments
- History of another chronic disease (such as heart disease, celiac's, bronchial asthma, etc)
- Have a diagnosis of narrow-angle glaucoma
- History or presence of high blood pressure
- History or presence of melanoma cancer
- Currently on a high-protein diet
- Women who are pregnant, trying to get pregnant, or breastfeeding
- +22 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Apkar V Apkarian, PhD
Northwestern University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2014
First Posted
April 17, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 10, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10