The Role of Adding Concurrent Chemotherapy to IMRT in the Treatment of Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Phase II Study Comparing Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) in Combination With Concurrent Chemotherapy and IMRT Alone for Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study is designed to compare Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) in combination with concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT alone in treatment of stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Apr 2014
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2018
CompletedApril 16, 2014
April 1, 2014
3.1 years
April 2, 2014
April 15, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Failure-free survival (FFS)
The time is calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of occurrence of relapse or distant metastasis.
One year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Overall survival (OS)
One year
Loco-regional failure-free survival (LFFS)
One year
Distant metastasis failure-free survival (DMFS)
One year
Acute and late adverse events
Four months
Study Arms (2)
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
EXPERIMENTALConcurrent chemoradiotherapy: IMRT was given to the patients with regimen of 66Gy-76Gy to the gross target volume of nasopharynx,66-70Gy to the gross target volume of positive nodes, 60-62Gy the high risk clinical target volume, 50-56Gy to the low risk clinical target volume. Concurrent chemotherapy is administrated with cisplatin 100mg/m2 at d1, d22, d43 during radiotherapy.
IMRT alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORIMRT is given to the patients with regimen of 66Gy-76Gy to the gross target volume of nasopharynx,66-70Gy to the gross target volume of positive nodes, 60-62Gy the high risk clinical target volume, 50-56Gy to the low risk clinical target volume.
Interventions
Three cycles of weekly Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 starting on the first day of IMRT
Intensity modulated radiotherapy is a technique of radiotherapy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing (according to WHO histologically type).
- Years to 70 Years
- Tumor staged as T1-2N1/ T2N0 (according to the 7th AJCC edition),No evidence of distant metastasis (M0)
- Satisfactory performance status: Karnofsky scale (KPS) \> 70 (Appendix I ).
- Adequate marrow: leucocyte count \> 4×109/L, neutrophil count \> 2×109/L, hemoglobin \> 90g/L and platelet count \> 100×109/L
- Normal liver function test: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) \< 1.5×upper limit of normal (ULN) concomitant with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) \< 2.5×ULN, and bilirubin \< ULN
- Adequate renal function: creatinine clearance \> 60 ml/min
- Patients must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and give written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- WHO Type keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma or basaloid squamous cell carcinoma.
- Age \> 60 or \< 18.
- Treatment with palliative intent.
- Prior malignancy except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer.
- Pregnancy or lactation (consider pregnancy test in women of child-bearing age and emphasize effective contraception during the treatment period).
- History of previous RT (except for non-melanomatous skin cancers outside intended RT treatment volume).
- Prior chemotherapy or surgery (except diagnostic) to primary tumor or nodes.
- Any severe intercurrent disease, which may bring unacceptable risk or affect the compliance of the trial, for example, unstable cardiac disease requiring treatment, renal disease, chronic hepatitis, diabetes with poor control (fasting plasma glucose \> 1.5×ULN), and emotional disturbance.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
Related Publications (4)
Yoshizaki T, Ito M, Murono S, Wakisaka N, Kondo S, Endo K. Current understanding and management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2012 Apr;39(2):137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 May 17.
PMID: 21592702BACKGROUNDChan AT, Teo PM, Johnson PJ. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2002 Jul;13(7):1007-15. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf179.
PMID: 12176778BACKGROUNDSu SF, Han F, Zhao C, Huang Y, Chen CY, Xiao WW, Li JX, Lu TX. Treatment outcomes for different subgroups of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Chin J Cancer. 2011 Aug;30(8):565-73. doi: 10.5732/cjc.010.10547.
PMID: 21801605BACKGROUNDTham IW, Lin S, Pan J, Han L, Lu JJ, Wee J. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy without concurrent chemotherapy for stage IIb nasopharyngeal cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun;33(3):294-9. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181d2edab.
PMID: 20395788BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2014
First Posted
April 16, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 16, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04