EUS vs. MDCT in Pancreatic Malignancy
EUSPACT
Endoscopic UltraSound in Potentially Resectable PAncreatic Malignancy - Does it Bear the Weight of the Rapidly Evolving Technology of Computer Tomography?
1 other identifier
observational
45
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Accurate staging of patients with pancreatic cancer is critical to avoid the expense, morbidity, and mortality related to unnecessary surgery. While several tests are available for assessing such patients, consensus has not been achieved on the optimal approach. As a matter of fact, pancreatic cancer staging is discussed controversially due to conflicting evidence and certainly EUS has lost grounds due to improvements in CT technology. Thus, the role of EUS and EUS-guided FNA varies among treatment centers. The present study is designed to better define the role of EUS in predicting resectability, as compared to high resolution cross-sectional imaging.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2014
Typical duration for all trials
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedApril 28, 2020
April 1, 2020
3.5 years
April 13, 2014
April 26, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Staging capability of each study procedure
Each imaging test (MDCT and EUS) and findings at or after surgery are to be judged on their ability to provide descriptions of the primary tumor's size, location, relationship to vessels - using the terms abutment (≤180º of contact) and encasement (\>180º of contact), vessel occlusion, variant vascular anatomy, a grade regarding local tumor resectability (resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced; R0 or R1 resection), and extent and location of extrapancreatic disease.
Up to 2 weeks, depending on the time of the surgical intervention
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Side-effects related to the EUS examination
Monitored for 24 hours after EUS
Patient survival time, and tumor recurrence-free survival
Up to 2 years
Study Arms (1)
Potentially resectable pancreatic cancer
Patients with a confirmed pancreatic mass (suspected neoplastic) deemed resectable or borderline resectable on multislice (at least 16 simultaneously acquired slices) pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT), fit and willing to undergo surgery with a curative (R0) intent.
Eligibility Criteria
Consecutive patients with a confirmed pancreatic mass (suspected neoplastic) deemed resectable or borderline resectable on multislice (at least 16 simultaneously acquired slices) pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT), fit and willing to undergo surgery with a curative (R0) intent.
You may qualify if:
- adult (≥ 18 years of age) patients;
- the presence of a confirmed pancreatic mass (suspected neoplastic) deemed resectable or borderline resectable on multislice (at least 16 simultaneously acquired slices) pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT);
- patients fit and willing to undergo surgery with a curative (R0) intent;
- sign of the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- the presence of significant co-morbidities that contraindicate pancreatic resection;
- previous neo-adjuvant oncologic therapy;
- distant metastases;
- lack of discernment;
- refusal to sign the informed consent..
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Clinical Hospital Colentinalead
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiovacollaborator
- Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacycollaborator
- Institutul Clinic Fundenicollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Research Center in Gastroenterogy and Hepatology
Craiova, Dolj, 200638, Romania
University Military Hospital
Bucharest, 010825, Romania
Gastroenterology Department, Clinical Hospital Colentina
Bucharest, 020125, Romania
Fundeni Clinical Institute
Bucharest, Romania
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mihai Rimbas, MD, PhD
Clinical Hospital Colentina, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
- STUDY CHAIR
Cristian R Baicus, Professor
Clinical Hospital Colentina, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Adrian Saftoiu, Professor
Craiova research Center in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Craiova University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD, Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2014
First Posted
April 15, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04