NCT02115022

Brief Summary

Accurate staging of patients with pancreatic cancer is critical to avoid the expense, morbidity, and mortality related to unnecessary surgery. While several tests are available for assessing such patients, consensus has not been achieved on the optimal approach. As a matter of fact, pancreatic cancer staging is discussed controversially due to conflicting evidence and certainly EUS has lost grounds due to improvements in CT technology. Thus, the role of EUS and EUS-guided FNA varies among treatment centers. The present study is designed to better define the role of EUS in predicting resectability, as compared to high resolution cross-sectional imaging.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2014

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 13, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 15, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2014

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 28, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

April 13, 2014

Last Update Submit

April 26, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

pancreatic cancerresectabilityendosonography (EUS)multidetection computer tomography (MDCT)staging

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Staging capability of each study procedure

    Each imaging test (MDCT and EUS) and findings at or after surgery are to be judged on their ability to provide descriptions of the primary tumor's size, location, relationship to vessels - using the terms abutment (≤180º of contact) and encasement (\>180º of contact), vessel occlusion, variant vascular anatomy, a grade regarding local tumor resectability (resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced; R0 or R1 resection), and extent and location of extrapancreatic disease.

    Up to 2 weeks, depending on the time of the surgical intervention

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Side-effects related to the EUS examination

    Monitored for 24 hours after EUS

  • Patient survival time, and tumor recurrence-free survival

    Up to 2 years

Study Arms (1)

Potentially resectable pancreatic cancer

Patients with a confirmed pancreatic mass (suspected neoplastic) deemed resectable or borderline resectable on multislice (at least 16 simultaneously acquired slices) pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT), fit and willing to undergo surgery with a curative (R0) intent.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Consecutive patients with a confirmed pancreatic mass (suspected neoplastic) deemed resectable or borderline resectable on multislice (at least 16 simultaneously acquired slices) pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT), fit and willing to undergo surgery with a curative (R0) intent.

You may qualify if:

  • adult (≥ 18 years of age) patients;
  • the presence of a confirmed pancreatic mass (suspected neoplastic) deemed resectable or borderline resectable on multislice (at least 16 simultaneously acquired slices) pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT);
  • patients fit and willing to undergo surgery with a curative (R0) intent;
  • sign of the informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • the presence of significant co-morbidities that contraindicate pancreatic resection;
  • previous neo-adjuvant oncologic therapy;
  • distant metastases;
  • lack of discernment;
  • refusal to sign the informed consent..

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Research Center in Gastroenterogy and Hepatology

Craiova, Dolj, 200638, Romania

Location

University Military Hospital

Bucharest, 010825, Romania

Location

Gastroenterology Department, Clinical Hospital Colentina

Bucharest, 020125, Romania

Location

Fundeni Clinical Institute

Bucharest, Romania

Location

Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine

Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Mihai Rimbas, MD, PhD

    Clinical Hospital Colentina, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Cristian R Baicus, Professor

    Clinical Hospital Colentina, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Adrian Saftoiu, Professor

    Craiova research Center in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Craiova University of Medicine and Pharmacy

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
2 Years
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD, Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2014

First Posted

April 15, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion

January 1, 2018

Study Completion

February 1, 2018

Last Updated

April 28, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Locations