A Comparison of Targinact vs. Oxycodone on Gut Function After Colorectal Surgery
TACS
A Randomized Blinded Pilot Study to Compare Targinact vs. Oxycodone in Early Return of Gastrointestinal Function After Colorectal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Two key requirements for discharge from hospital after major abdominal surgery are adequate oral analgesia and resumption of oral nutrition. Up to 40% of patients suffer delayed discharge after abdominal surgery due to delayed return of gut function, manifesting as nausea, vomiting, constipation and abdominal distension. Opiates and their derivatives are the mainstay of postoperative analgesic regimens after abdominal surgery and are highly effective in achieving adequate pain control. However, opioids cause impaired gut function by reducing normal forward propulsion and increasing gut spasm. Opioid receptor blockers such as Alvimopan counteract these effects and can accelerate postoperative gut recovery but are expensive and cause cardiac complications; alternative painkillers such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatories are less effective than opioids and have been linked with increased risk of anastomotic leaks. Targinact is a combination of prolonged release opioid analgesic (oxycodone hydrochloride) and naloxone hydrochloride (an opioid receptor blocker). The formulation of the product confines the naloxone action to the gut to reduce the unwanted side-effects on gut function. Targinact has been shown in patients with chronic severe pain to provide comparable analgesia to other opioid analgesics whilst reducing the unwanted side-effect of constipation. The Investigators wish to test the hypothesis that Targinact will provide adequate analgesia after colonic resection with reduced postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction. The surgical procedure chosen to test this hypothesis is laparoscopic segmental colectomy, a consistently reproducible intervention with a postoperative gut dysfunction rate of up to 40% (prospective data from the Edinburgh Colorectal Unit). The main outcome of the study will be return of normal gut function at the time of planned discharge (Day 3).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 postoperative-pain
Started Oct 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 10, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 29, 2017
CompletedMarch 29, 2017
February 1, 2017
10 months
April 3, 2014
November 23, 2016
February 8, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Prevalence of Postoperative Gut Dysfunction
The proportion of participants with gut dysfunction, defined as the presence of any of the following sufficient to delay discharge on the 3rd postoperative day: nausea, vomiting, intolerance of oral intake or constipation.
Day 3 post-op
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Total Opioid Analgesia Consumption
Total postoperative period of analgesic consumption, an average of 1 week
Pain Scores
Postoperative day 3
Study Arms (2)
Targinact
EXPERIMENTALOral Targinact 10-20mg bd following laparoscopic segmental colectomy
Oxycodone
ACTIVE COMPARATOROral oxycodone 10-20mg bd following laparoscopic segmental colectomy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic segmental colectomy at the Colorectal Surgery Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy Age \<18 years Patients lacking capacity to give informed consent. Severe liver dysfunction (Child's A or greater) Patients participating in another therapeutic clinical trial Contraindication to oxycodone, naloxone or Targinact Pre-existing dependence on opioid analgesia (current medications will be checked prior to discussing consent) Pre-existing use of opioid analgesia for chronic pain (current medications will be checked prior to discussing consent) Patients with rectal cancer Plan to form any stoma during procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Western General Hospital
Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PB, Hendry PO, Spies C, von Meyenfeldt MF, Fearon KC, Revhaug A, Norderval S, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Dejong CH; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg. 2009 Oct;144(10):961-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.170.
PMID: 19841366BACKGROUNDHendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KC; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Study Group. Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg. 2009 Feb;96(2):197-205. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6445.
PMID: 19160347BACKGROUNDSimpson K, Leyendecker P, Hopp M, Muller-Lissner S, Lowenstein O, De Andres J, Troy Ferrarons J, Bosse B, Krain B, Nichols T, Kremers W, Reimer K. Fixed-ratio combination oxycodone/naloxone compared with oxycodone alone for the relief of opioid-induced constipation in moderate-to-severe noncancer pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Dec;24(12):3503-12. doi: 10.1185/03007990802584454.
PMID: 19032132BACKGROUNDCreamer F, Balfour A, Nimmo S, Foo I, Norrie JD, Williams LJ, Fearon KC, Paterson HM. Randomized open-label phase II study comparing oxycodone-naloxone with oxycodone in early return of gastrointestinal function after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2017 Jan;104(1):42-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10322. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
PMID: 27762434DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Hugh M Paterson
- Organization
- University of Edinburgh
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hugh M Paterson, MD FRCS
University of Edinburgh
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2014
First Posted
April 10, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 29, 2017
Results First Posted
March 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share