NCT02105558

Brief Summary

To compare the effects of epidural versus combined spinal and epidural (CSE) anesthesia on the success of Trial of Labor After Cesarean (TOLAC).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2014

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2014

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 2, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 7, 2014

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 13, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 13, 2017

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 19, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

July 19, 2018

Status Verified

June 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

April 2, 2014

Results QC Date

June 22, 2018

Last Update Submit

June 22, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

trial of labor after cesareanvaginal birth after cesareanepidural vs combined spinal epidural

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC)

    at the time of delivery

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Success of Analgesia as Indicated by Pain Score Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    baseline

  • Success of Analgesia as Indicated by Pain Score Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    15 minutes after regional anesthesia

  • Success of Analgesia as Indicated by Pain Score Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    30 minutes after regional anesthesia

  • Success of Analgesia as Indicated by Pain Score Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    60 minutes after regional anesthesia

  • Success of Analgesia as Indicated by Pain Score Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    24 hours after regional anesthesia

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Epidural anesthesia

EXPERIMENTAL

Trial of labor after cesarean with an epidural for anesthesia: Epidurals will be placed in a sterile fashion using a 17g Tuohy needle to locate the epidural space via loss-of-resistance to saline at the lumbar vertebral level. 3 ml of 1.5% lidocaine with 5ug/ml of epinephrine will then be used for test dose to exclude intrathecal or intravenous placement of the catheter. Epidural solution composed of 5ml of 0.2% ropivacaine and another 5 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine will then be administered.

Drug: Epidural anesthesia

Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia

EXPERIMENTAL

Trial of labor after cesarean with a combined spinal and epidural (CSE) for anesthesia: the epidural space will be located with a 17g Tuohy needle and dural puncture performed with 25g Pencan needle via needle-through-needle technique. Spinal injection of 2ml 0.2% ropivacaine will then be performed and spinal needle removed. An epidural catheter will then be placed and test dose performed with 3 ml of 1.5% lidocaine with 5ug/ml of epinephrine. Maintenance dose will be via an epidural pump using 0.2% ropivacaine at a rate of 12 ml/hr.

Drug: Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia

Interventions

An epidural involves injecting pain-blocking medication into a space between the vertebrae and the spinal fluid; it usually takes about 15 minutes to work. Epidurals will be placed in a sterile fashion using a 17g Tuohy needle to locate the epidural space via loss-of-resistance to saline at the lumbar vertebral level. 3 ml of 1.5% lidocaine with 5ug/ml of epinephrine will then be used for test dose to exclude intrathecal or intravenous placement of the catheter. Epidural solution composed of 5ml of 0.2% ropivacaine and another 5 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine will then be administered.

Epidural anesthesia

A spinal is an injection directly into the spinal fluid; it is given in addition to the epidural technique and takes effect in five minutes. The epidural space will be located with a 17g Tuohy needle and dural puncture performed with 25g Pencan needle via needle-through-needle technique. Spinal injection of 2ml 0.2% ropivacaine will then be performed and spinal needle removed. An epidural catheter will then be placed and test dose performed with 3 ml of 1.5% lidocaine with 5ug/ml of epinephrine. Maintenance dose will be via an epidural pump using 0.2% ropivacaine at a rate of 12 ml/hr.

Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • all patients meeting ACOG guidelines for TOLAC
  • at least one previous elective cesarean delivery
  • \<40 weeks gestational age (GA)
  • vertex singleton pregnancy with use of continuous fetal monitoring

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refusal of regional anesthetic or with contraindication for regional anesthesia
  • BMI \>40
  • associated comorbidities such as gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, abnormal placentation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Lyndon B. Johnson Hospital

Houston, Texas, 77026, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Labor Pain

Interventions

Anesthesia, Epidural

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Limitations and Caveats

lower than expected sample size (the study was powered for 60 but only 46 participants were enrolled)

Results Point of Contact

Title
Madhumani Rupasinghe, MD
Organization
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Study Officials

  • Opal Raj, MD

    The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2014

First Posted

April 7, 2014

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion

April 13, 2017

Study Completion

April 13, 2017

Last Updated

July 19, 2018

Results First Posted

July 19, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-06

Locations