Efficacy Study of Articaine Lozenge to Enhance the Procedural Compliance of the Adults Undergoing Gastroduodenoscopy
Comparison of Novel Articaine Lozenge Versus Placebo for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Adults. A Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine in prospective, double-blinded randomised manner the ability of novel articaine-containing lozenge to enhance the procedure related compliance (compared to placebo) of the adult patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Oct 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2020
CompletedMay 6, 2019
May 1, 2019
5.2 years
March 29, 2014
May 3, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of participants with 15% change in tolerability points according to Numeric Rating Scale (compared to baseline Numeric Rating Scale).
30 minutes after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Endoscopists´ procedural satisfaction points after the procedure assessed by using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
within 30 minutes after the procedure
Cumulative consumption of alfentanil during the procedure (mg)
30 minutes after the procedure
Study Arms (3)
Sodium chloride 0.9%
PLACEBO COMPARATORSodium chloride 0.9% flavoured lozenge 10 ml administered orally (gargled and swallowed by patient) 3 minutes before the upper GI endoscopy
Articaine hydrochloride 1%
EXPERIMENTALArticaine hydrochloride 1% flavoured lozenge 10 ml administered orally (gargled and swallowed by patient) 3 minutes before the upper GI endoscopy
Articaine hydrochloride 2%
EXPERIMENTALArticaine hydrochloride 2% flavoured lozenge 10 ml administered orally (gargled and swallowed by patient) 3 minutes before the upper GI endoscopy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- elective procedure
- weight over 40 kg
- American Society of Anesthesiology class I-III
- first upper GI endoscopy procedure
- finnish or/and swedish speaking
You may not qualify if:
- amide and/or esther local anaesthetic allergy
- paraben allergy
- Child-Pugh grade B/C liver failure
- renal insufficiency (calculated glomerular filtration rate under 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 according to Cockcroft-Gault scale )
- dementia
- those presenting with swallowing problem
- chronic pain condition
- chronic use of pain medication
- pregnancy
- lactation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care medicine, Divison of Surgery, Meilahti hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00029, Finland
Related Publications (16)
Campo R, Brullet E, Montserrat A, Calvet X, Moix J, Rue M, Roque M, Donoso L, Bordas JM. Identification of factors that influence tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Feb;11(2):201-4. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199902000-00023.
PMID: 10102233BACKGROUNDDavis DE, Jones MP, Kubik CM. Topical pharyngeal anesthesia does not improve upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in conscious sedated patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jul;94(7):1853-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01217.x.
PMID: 10406247BACKGROUNDShaoul R, Higaze H, Lavy A. Evaluation of topical pharyngeal anaesthesia by benzocaine lozenge for upper endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Aug 15;24(4):687-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03023.x.
PMID: 16907901BACKGROUNDEvans LT, Saberi S, Kim HM, Elta GH, Schoenfeld P. Pharyngeal anesthesia during sedated EGDs: is "the spray" beneficial? A meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 May;63(6):761-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.059.
PMID: 16650534BACKGROUNDAsante MA, Northfield TC. Variation in taste of topical lignocaine anaesthesia for gastroscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Jul;12(7):685-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00355.x.
PMID: 9701534BACKGROUNDMogensen S, Treldal C, Feldager E, Pulis S, Jacobsen J, Andersen O, Rasmussen M. New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Local Reg Anesth. 2012;5:17-22. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S30715. Epub 2012 May 31.
PMID: 22915898BACKGROUNDVree TB, Gielen MJ. Clinical pharmacology and the use of articaine for local and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;19(2):293-308. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.12.006.
PMID: 15966499BACKGROUNDBrinklov MM. Clinical effects of carticaine, a new local anesthetic. A survey and a double-blind investigation comparing carticaine with lidocaine in epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1977;21(1):5-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1977.tb01186.x.
PMID: 320810BACKGROUNDKallio H, Snall EV, Luode T, Rosenberg PH. Hyperbaric articaine for day-case spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Nov;97(5):704-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael222. Epub 2006 Aug 5.
PMID: 16891634BACKGROUNDPitkanen MT, Xu M, Haasio J, Rosenberg PH. Comparison of 0.5% articaine and 0.5% prilocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia of the arm: a cross-over study in volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999 Mar-Apr;24(2):131-5.
PMID: 10204898BACKGROUNDSimon MA, Vree TB, Gielen MJ, Booij LH, Lagerwerf AJ. Similar motor block effects with different disposition kinetics between lidocaine and (+ or -) articaine in patients undergoing axillary brachial plexus block during day case surgery. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Dec;37(12):598-607.
PMID: 10599952BACKGROUNDVree TB, Baars AM, van Oss GE, Booij LH. High-performance liquid chromatography and preliminary pharmacokinetics of articaine and its 2-carboxy metabolite in human serum and urine. J Chromatogr. 1988 Feb 26;424(2):440-4. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)81126-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 3372637BACKGROUNDProut BJ, Metreweli C. Pulmonary aspiration after fibre-endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Br Med J. 1972 Nov 4;4(5835):269-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5835.269.
PMID: 4343464BACKGROUNDOertel R, Rahn R, Kirch W. Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Dec;33(6):417-25. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733060-00002.
PMID: 9435991BACKGROUNDSimon MA, Vree TB, Gielen MJ, Booij LH. Comparison of the effects and disposition kinetics of articaine and lidocaine in 20 patients undergoing intravenous regional anaesthesia during day case surgery. Pharm World Sci. 1998 Apr;20(2):88-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1008622018161.
PMID: 9584343BACKGROUNDAlhashemi JA. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for monitored anaesthesia care during cataract surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Jun;96(6):722-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael080. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
PMID: 16595611BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mihkel Meinberg, MD
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care medicine, Division of Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Reino Pöyhiä, MD, PhD
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care medicine, Division of Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2014
First Posted
April 7, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
September 1, 2020
Last Updated
May 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05