NCT02105090

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine in prospective, double-blinded randomised manner the ability of novel articaine-containing lozenge to enhance the procedure related compliance (compared to placebo) of the adult patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2014

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 29, 2014

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 7, 2014

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2014

Completed
5.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2019

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

5.2 years

First QC Date

March 29, 2014

Last Update Submit

May 3, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Upper gastrointestinal tractEndoscopyLozengeArticaineDyspepsiaHematemesisAbdominal painHeartburn

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of participants with 15% change in tolerability points according to Numeric Rating Scale (compared to baseline Numeric Rating Scale).

    30 minutes after the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Endoscopists´ procedural satisfaction points after the procedure assessed by using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    within 30 minutes after the procedure

  • Cumulative consumption of alfentanil during the procedure (mg)

    30 minutes after the procedure

Study Arms (3)

Sodium chloride 0.9%

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Sodium chloride 0.9% flavoured lozenge 10 ml administered orally (gargled and swallowed by patient) 3 minutes before the upper GI endoscopy

Drug: Sodium Chloride 0.9%

Articaine hydrochloride 1%

EXPERIMENTAL

Articaine hydrochloride 1% flavoured lozenge 10 ml administered orally (gargled and swallowed by patient) 3 minutes before the upper GI endoscopy

Drug: Anesthetics, Local

Articaine hydrochloride 2%

EXPERIMENTAL

Articaine hydrochloride 2% flavoured lozenge 10 ml administered orally (gargled and swallowed by patient) 3 minutes before the upper GI endoscopy

Drug: Anesthetics, Local

Interventions

Also known as: Ultracain D ohne Adrenalin 20 mg/ml, ATC code N01BB08
Articaine hydrochloride 1%Articaine hydrochloride 2%
Sodium chloride 0.9%

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • elective procedure
  • weight over 40 kg
  • American Society of Anesthesiology class I-III
  • first upper GI endoscopy procedure
  • finnish or/and swedish speaking

You may not qualify if:

  • amide and/or esther local anaesthetic allergy
  • paraben allergy
  • Child-Pugh grade B/C liver failure
  • renal insufficiency (calculated glomerular filtration rate under 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 according to Cockcroft-Gault scale )
  • dementia
  • those presenting with swallowing problem
  • chronic pain condition
  • chronic use of pain medication
  • pregnancy
  • lactation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care medicine, Divison of Surgery, Meilahti hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00029, Finland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (16)

  • Campo R, Brullet E, Montserrat A, Calvet X, Moix J, Rue M, Roque M, Donoso L, Bordas JM. Identification of factors that influence tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Feb;11(2):201-4. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199902000-00023.

    PMID: 10102233BACKGROUND
  • Davis DE, Jones MP, Kubik CM. Topical pharyngeal anesthesia does not improve upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in conscious sedated patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jul;94(7):1853-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01217.x.

    PMID: 10406247BACKGROUND
  • Shaoul R, Higaze H, Lavy A. Evaluation of topical pharyngeal anaesthesia by benzocaine lozenge for upper endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Aug 15;24(4):687-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03023.x.

    PMID: 16907901BACKGROUND
  • Evans LT, Saberi S, Kim HM, Elta GH, Schoenfeld P. Pharyngeal anesthesia during sedated EGDs: is "the spray" beneficial? A meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 May;63(6):761-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.059.

    PMID: 16650534BACKGROUND
  • Asante MA, Northfield TC. Variation in taste of topical lignocaine anaesthesia for gastroscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Jul;12(7):685-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00355.x.

    PMID: 9701534BACKGROUND
  • Mogensen S, Treldal C, Feldager E, Pulis S, Jacobsen J, Andersen O, Rasmussen M. New lidocaine lozenge as topical anesthesia compared to lidocaine viscous oral solution before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Local Reg Anesth. 2012;5:17-22. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S30715. Epub 2012 May 31.

    PMID: 22915898BACKGROUND
  • Vree TB, Gielen MJ. Clinical pharmacology and the use of articaine for local and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;19(2):293-308. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.12.006.

    PMID: 15966499BACKGROUND
  • Brinklov MM. Clinical effects of carticaine, a new local anesthetic. A survey and a double-blind investigation comparing carticaine with lidocaine in epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1977;21(1):5-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1977.tb01186.x.

    PMID: 320810BACKGROUND
  • Kallio H, Snall EV, Luode T, Rosenberg PH. Hyperbaric articaine for day-case spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Nov;97(5):704-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael222. Epub 2006 Aug 5.

    PMID: 16891634BACKGROUND
  • Pitkanen MT, Xu M, Haasio J, Rosenberg PH. Comparison of 0.5% articaine and 0.5% prilocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia of the arm: a cross-over study in volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999 Mar-Apr;24(2):131-5.

    PMID: 10204898BACKGROUND
  • Simon MA, Vree TB, Gielen MJ, Booij LH, Lagerwerf AJ. Similar motor block effects with different disposition kinetics between lidocaine and (+ or -) articaine in patients undergoing axillary brachial plexus block during day case surgery. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Dec;37(12):598-607.

    PMID: 10599952BACKGROUND
  • Vree TB, Baars AM, van Oss GE, Booij LH. High-performance liquid chromatography and preliminary pharmacokinetics of articaine and its 2-carboxy metabolite in human serum and urine. J Chromatogr. 1988 Feb 26;424(2):440-4. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)81126-3. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3372637BACKGROUND
  • Prout BJ, Metreweli C. Pulmonary aspiration after fibre-endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Br Med J. 1972 Nov 4;4(5835):269-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5835.269.

    PMID: 4343464BACKGROUND
  • Oertel R, Rahn R, Kirch W. Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Dec;33(6):417-25. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733060-00002.

    PMID: 9435991BACKGROUND
  • Simon MA, Vree TB, Gielen MJ, Booij LH. Comparison of the effects and disposition kinetics of articaine and lidocaine in 20 patients undergoing intravenous regional anaesthesia during day case surgery. Pharm World Sci. 1998 Apr;20(2):88-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1008622018161.

    PMID: 9584343BACKGROUND
  • Alhashemi JA. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for monitored anaesthesia care during cataract surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Jun;96(6):722-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael080. Epub 2006 Apr 4.

    PMID: 16595611BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DyspepsiaHematemesisAbdominal PainHeartburn

Interventions

Anesthetics, LocalSodium Chloride

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsGastrointestinal HemorrhageGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesVomitingPainNeurologic Manifestations

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnestheticsCentral Nervous System DepressantsPhysiological Effects of DrugsPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesSensory System AgentsPeripheral Nervous System AgentsCentral Nervous System AgentsTherapeutic UsesChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium Compounds

Study Officials

  • Mihkel Meinberg, MD

    Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care medicine, Division of Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Reino Pöyhiä, MD, PhD

    Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care medicine, Division of Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Mihkel Meinberg, MD

CONTACT

Reino Pöyhiä, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2014

First Posted

April 7, 2014

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2019

Study Completion

September 1, 2020

Last Updated

May 6, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Locations