NCT02104557

Brief Summary

Post Marketing Surveillance To Observe Safety And Efficacy Of Sayana® Used For Contraception And Management Of Endometriosis-Associated Pain

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
362

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2014

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

19 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 13, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2014

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 4, 2014

Completed
6.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 5, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 5, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 10, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 10, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6.3 years

First QC Date

April 1, 2014

Results QC Date

May 14, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 14, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

SayanaPregnancyContraceptionEndometriosis-associated painPMSPost Marketing Surveillance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events.

    Baseline up to a maximum of 12 months

  • Number of Participants Discontinued From Study Due to AEs

    Participants who discontinued permanently from the study due to AEs are reported. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship.

    Baseline up to a maximum of 12 months

  • Number of Participants Used Concomitant Medications for Treating AEs

    Number of participants taking any medications other than Sayana (concomitant medication) to treat AEs are reported.

    Baseline up to a maximum of 12 months

  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Test Abnormalities

    Laboratory tests included hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis. Clinical significance was identified by investigators' judgements based on laboratory test results.

    Baseline up to a maximum of 12 months

  • Percentage of Participants Who Became Pregnant Over Observation Period

    The cumulative percent of participants who became pregnant over observation period was calculated as 100\*(1- Kaplan-Meier curve at month 12), where the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method for estimating survival function was applied to time-to-pregnancy.

    Baseline up to 12 months

  • Rate of Pregnancies Per 100 Participant-years of Follow-up

    Pregnancies per 100 person-years of follow-up defined as major events, incidence rate was calculated as: 100\*(total number of participants with effectiveness endpoint)/(total person-years of participants included in the effectiveness analysis set) where total person-years is equal to (last evaluation date of outcome - first date of administration +1)/365.25 for all participants in the effective analysis set.

    Baseline up to 12 months

  • Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores After Administration of First Dose (Month 3) of Study Drug

    Participants were asked to indicate the subjective level of endometriosis pain looking back at the last 3 months and mark it with a single vertical mark on the 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale, where 0 mm represented absence of pain and 100 mm indicated unbearable pain. Higher score indicated more pain. Change from baseline in pain VAS score after administration of first dose of study drug is reported in this outcome measure.

    Baseline, Month 3

  • Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores After Administration of Second Dose (Month 6) of Study Drug

    Participants were asked to indicate the subjective level of endometriosis pain looking back at the last 3 months and mark it with a single vertical mark on the 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale, where 0 mm represented absence of pain and 100 mm indicated unbearable pain. Higher score indicated more pain. Change from baseline in pain VAS score after administration of second dose of study drug is reported in this outcome measure.

    Baseline, Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores After Administration of Third Dose (Month 9) of Study Drug

    Participants were asked to indicate the subjective level of endometriosis pain looking back at the last 3 months and mark it with a single vertical mark on the 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale, where 0 mm represented absence of pain and 100 mm indicated unbearable pain. Higher score indicated more pain. Change from baseline in pain VAS score after administration of third dose of study drug is reported in this outcome measure.

    Baseline, Month 9

  • Change From Baseline in in Endometriosis Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores After Administration of Fourth Dose (Month 12) of Study Drug

    Participants were asked to indicate the subjective level of endometriosis pain looking back at the last 3 months and mark it with a single vertical mark on the 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale, where 0 mm represented absence of pain and 100 mm indicated unbearable pain. Higher score indicated more pain. Change from baseline in pain VAS score after administration of fourth dose of study drug is reported in this outcome measure.

    Baseline, Month 12

Study Arms (2)

prevention of pregnancy

Non intervention

Other: Non intervention

management of endometriosis-associated pain

Non intervention

Other: Non intervention

Interventions

Non intervention

prevention of pregnancy

Eligibility Criteria

Age0 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Women subjects who are initiating treatment with Sayana® for the first time as per the local product document for usage

You may qualify if:

  • \- Subjects or legally authorized representatives of pediatric subjects agree to provide written informed consent form (ie, data privacy statement).
  • Women subjects who are initiating treatment with Sayana® for the first time as per the local product document for usage

You may not qualify if:

  • Known or suspected pregnancy.
  • Undiagnosed vaginal bleeding.
  • Known or suspected malignancy of breast.
  • Active thrombophlebitis, or current or past history of thromboembolic disorders, or cerebral vascular disease.
  • Significant liver disease.
  • Known hypersensitivity to medroxyprogesterone acetate or any of its other ingredients.
  • Women who are before menarche or who are post-menopausal.
  • Treatment with any investigational agent or device within 30 days prior to the enrollment visit.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (19)

Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital

Haeundae-gu, Busan, 48108, South Korea

Location

Bundang Cha Medical Center

Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13496, South Korea

Location

CHA Bundang Medical Center-CHA University

Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13496, South Korea

Location

Ajou University Hospital

Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, South Korea

Location

Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital Seoul

Seoul, Korea, 04401, South Korea

Location

Ulsan University Hospital

Ulsan, Korea, 44033, South Korea

Location

Min Hyunju Women's Clinic

Busan, South Korea

Location

Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital

Daegu, 41931, South Korea

Location

Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital

Seoul, 01757, South Korea

Location

Konkuk University Medical Center

Seoul, 05030, South Korea

Location

Asan Medical Center

Seoul, 05505, South Korea

Location

Samsung Medical Center

Seoul, 06351, South Korea

Location

Chung-Ang University Hospital

Seoul, 06973, South Korea

Location

Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital

Seoul, 07985, South Korea

Location

Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System

Seoul, 120-752, South Korea

Location

CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University

Seoul, 135-913, South Korea

Location

Roen Clinic

Seoul, 135-932, South Korea

Location

Nana Clinic

Seoul, 137-809, South Korea

Location

Avenue Clinic

Seoul, 139-832, South Korea

Location

Related Links

Results Point of Contact

Title
Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Organization
Pfizer Inc.

Study Officials

  • Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

    Pfizer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2014

First Posted

April 4, 2014

Study Start

February 13, 2014

Primary Completion

June 5, 2020

Study Completion

June 5, 2020

Last Updated

June 10, 2021

Results First Posted

June 10, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Locations