NCT02102360

Brief Summary

This clinical study compared a conventional surgical technique (CST) and a minimally invasive surgical technique (MIST) in the regenerative treatment of mandibular furcation defects.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2012

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 26, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 2, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

April 2, 2014

Status Verified

March 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

March 26, 2014

Last Update Submit

March 29, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

microsurgery, furcation defects, periodontal disease, enamel matrix proteins, bone substitutes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Horizontal clinical attachment level (HCAL)

    The clinical measure HCAL was assessed and recorded by an experienced periodontist, blinded to the procedures to assess the efficacy of surgical procedures.

    baseline and 6 months after surgical procedure

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Pain Scores on the Visual Analogue Scale

    7 days after surgery

  • Discomfort Scores on the Visual Analogue Scale

    7 days after surgery

  • Edema Scores on the Visual Analogue Scale

    7 days after surgery

  • Hematoma Scores on the Visual Analogue Scale

    7 days after surgery

  • Root Hypersensitivity Scores on the Visual Analogue Scale

    7 days after surgery

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Digital subtraction radiography density gain

    baseline and 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Minimally invasive surgical technique (MIST)

EXPERIMENTAL

A minimally invasive surgical technique was performed to access mandibular furcation defects in the test group, aiming to perform minimal flap reflection, minimal wound, and gentle handling of the soft and hard tissue in periodontal surgery. The use of a microsurgical approach provides magnification and optimal illumination of the surgical site improving visual acuity. Further advantages may be the reduction of flap reflection during surgery, consequently advantages in wound healing process and benefits in patient's perceptions of the procedure. A less invasive surgical procedure may lead to a less cell demand in the healing process, and a potentially reduced morbidity. The minimally invasive surgical procedures were performed using microscope.

Device: Anorganic Bovine BoneDevice: Enamel Matrix Derivative

Conventional surgical technique (CST)

EXPERIMENTAL

A conventional surgical technique was performed to access mandibular furcation defects in the control group.

Device: Anorganic Bovine BoneDevice: Enamel Matrix Derivative

Interventions

used to improve periodontal regenerative procedures.

Also known as: Anorganic Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss, Geistlich Pharma).
Conventional surgical technique (CST)Minimally invasive surgical technique (MIST)

used to improve periodontal regenerative procedures.

Also known as: Enamel Matrix Derivative (Emdogain - Institute Straumann, Switzerland).
Conventional surgical technique (CST)Minimally invasive surgical technique (MIST)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • (I) subjects with a diagnosis of periodontitis; (II) presence of one pair of contralateral mandibular molars with buccal / lingual furcation defects; (III) non-smokers; (IV) plaque index \< 20%.

You may not qualify if:

  • (I) patients that presented systemic disease; (II) had taken antibiotics in the past 6 months prior to surgery; (III) pregnant women or lactating mothers; (IV) molars with periapical disease; (V) cervical restorations or prosthesis closer than 1 mm to fornix; (VI) lingual furcation defects presenting gingival recession (GR)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo

Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Microsurgical approach to periodontal regeneration. Initial evaluation in a case cohort. J Periodontol. 2001 Apr;72(4):559-69. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.559.

    PMID: 11338311BACKGROUND
  • Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. A minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative in the regenerative treatment of intra-bony defects: a novel approach to limit morbidity. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Jan;34(1):87-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01020.x.

    PMID: 17243998BACKGROUND
  • Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Minimally invasive surgical technique and enamel matrix derivative in intra-bony defects. I: Clinical outcomes and morbidity. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Dec;34(12):1082-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01144.x. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

    PMID: 17953696BACKGROUND
  • Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Focus on intrabony defects: guided tissue regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2000 Feb;22:104-32. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2000.2220108.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11276509BACKGROUND
  • Cortellini P, Prato GP, Tonetti MS. The modified papilla preservation technique. A new surgical approach for interproximal regenerative procedures. J Periodontol. 1995 Apr;66(4):261-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.4.261.

    PMID: 7782979BACKGROUND
  • Wang HL, Greenwell H, Fiorellini J, Giannobile W, Offenbacher S, Salkin L, Townsend C, Sheridan P, Genco RJ; Research, Science and Therapy Committee. Periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol. 2005 Sep;76(9):1601-22. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.9.1601.

    PMID: 16171453BACKGROUND
  • Tsao YP, Neiva R, Al-Shammari K, Oh TJ, Wang HL. Factors influencing treatment outcomes in mandibular Class II furcation defects. J Periodontol. 2006 Apr;77(4):641-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050133.

    PMID: 16584345BACKGROUND
  • Martin M, Gantes B, Garrett S, Egelberg J. Treatment of periodontal furcation defects. (I). Review of the literature and description of a regenerative surgical technique. J Clin Periodontol. 1988 Apr;15(4):227-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1988.tb01575.x.

    PMID: 3290276BACKGROUND
  • Hammarstrom L, Heijl L, Gestrelius S. Periodontal regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Sep;24(9 Pt 2):669-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00248.x.

    PMID: 9310871BACKGROUND
  • Hammarstrom L. Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Sep;24(9 Pt 2):658-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00247.x.

    PMID: 9310870BACKGROUND
  • Heijl L. Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in one human experimental defect. A case report. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Sep;24(9 Pt 2):693-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1997.00693.x.

    PMID: 9310874BACKGROUND
  • Dori F, Arweiler NB, Szanto E, Agics A, Gera I, Sculean A. Ten-year results following treatment of intrabony defects with an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with either a natural bone mineral or a beta-tricalcium phosphate. J Periodontol. 2013 Jun;84(6):749-57. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120238. Epub 2012 Aug 8.

    PMID: 22873657BACKGROUND
  • Tonetti MS, Fourmousis I, Suvan J, Cortellini P, Bragger U, Lang NP; European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPERIO). Healing, post-operative morbidity and patient perception of outcomes following regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Dec;31(12):1092-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00615.x.

    PMID: 15560811BACKGROUND
  • Polimeni G, Xiropaidis AV, Wikesjo UM. Biology and principles of periodontal wound healing/regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2006;41:30-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00157.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16686925BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Furcation DefectsPeriodontal Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mouth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Conventional or minimally invasive surgical technique for the treatment of furcation defects using enamel matrix derivative and anorganic bovine bone - a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2014

First Posted

April 2, 2014

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion

November 1, 2013

Study Completion

December 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 2, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-03

Locations