Conventional or Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique for the Treatment of Furcation Defects Using Enamel Matrix Derivative and Anorganic Bovine Bone - a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical study compared a conventional surgical technique (CST) and a minimally invasive surgical technique (MIST) in the regenerative treatment of mandibular furcation defects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Mar 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2014
CompletedApril 2, 2014
March 1, 2014
1.7 years
March 26, 2014
March 29, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Horizontal clinical attachment level (HCAL)
The clinical measure HCAL was assessed and recorded by an experienced periodontist, blinded to the procedures to assess the efficacy of surgical procedures.
baseline and 6 months after surgical procedure
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Pain Scores on the Visual Analogue Scale
7 days after surgery
Discomfort Scores on the Visual Analogue Scale
7 days after surgery
Edema Scores on the Visual Analogue Scale
7 days after surgery
Hematoma Scores on the Visual Analogue Scale
7 days after surgery
Root Hypersensitivity Scores on the Visual Analogue Scale
7 days after surgery
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Digital subtraction radiography density gain
baseline and 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Minimally invasive surgical technique (MIST)
EXPERIMENTALA minimally invasive surgical technique was performed to access mandibular furcation defects in the test group, aiming to perform minimal flap reflection, minimal wound, and gentle handling of the soft and hard tissue in periodontal surgery. The use of a microsurgical approach provides magnification and optimal illumination of the surgical site improving visual acuity. Further advantages may be the reduction of flap reflection during surgery, consequently advantages in wound healing process and benefits in patient's perceptions of the procedure. A less invasive surgical procedure may lead to a less cell demand in the healing process, and a potentially reduced morbidity. The minimally invasive surgical procedures were performed using microscope.
Conventional surgical technique (CST)
EXPERIMENTALA conventional surgical technique was performed to access mandibular furcation defects in the control group.
Interventions
used to improve periodontal regenerative procedures.
used to improve periodontal regenerative procedures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- (I) subjects with a diagnosis of periodontitis; (II) presence of one pair of contralateral mandibular molars with buccal / lingual furcation defects; (III) non-smokers; (IV) plaque index \< 20%.
You may not qualify if:
- (I) patients that presented systemic disease; (II) had taken antibiotics in the past 6 months prior to surgery; (III) pregnant women or lactating mothers; (IV) molars with periapical disease; (V) cervical restorations or prosthesis closer than 1 mm to fornix; (VI) lingual furcation defects presenting gingival recession (GR)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil
Related Publications (14)
Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Microsurgical approach to periodontal regeneration. Initial evaluation in a case cohort. J Periodontol. 2001 Apr;72(4):559-69. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.559.
PMID: 11338311BACKGROUNDCortellini P, Tonetti MS. A minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative in the regenerative treatment of intra-bony defects: a novel approach to limit morbidity. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Jan;34(1):87-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01020.x.
PMID: 17243998BACKGROUNDCortellini P, Tonetti MS. Minimally invasive surgical technique and enamel matrix derivative in intra-bony defects. I: Clinical outcomes and morbidity. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Dec;34(12):1082-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01144.x. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
PMID: 17953696BACKGROUNDCortellini P, Tonetti MS. Focus on intrabony defects: guided tissue regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2000 Feb;22:104-32. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2000.2220108.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 11276509BACKGROUNDCortellini P, Prato GP, Tonetti MS. The modified papilla preservation technique. A new surgical approach for interproximal regenerative procedures. J Periodontol. 1995 Apr;66(4):261-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.4.261.
PMID: 7782979BACKGROUNDWang HL, Greenwell H, Fiorellini J, Giannobile W, Offenbacher S, Salkin L, Townsend C, Sheridan P, Genco RJ; Research, Science and Therapy Committee. Periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol. 2005 Sep;76(9):1601-22. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.9.1601.
PMID: 16171453BACKGROUNDTsao YP, Neiva R, Al-Shammari K, Oh TJ, Wang HL. Factors influencing treatment outcomes in mandibular Class II furcation defects. J Periodontol. 2006 Apr;77(4):641-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050133.
PMID: 16584345BACKGROUNDMartin M, Gantes B, Garrett S, Egelberg J. Treatment of periodontal furcation defects. (I). Review of the literature and description of a regenerative surgical technique. J Clin Periodontol. 1988 Apr;15(4):227-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1988.tb01575.x.
PMID: 3290276BACKGROUNDHammarstrom L, Heijl L, Gestrelius S. Periodontal regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Sep;24(9 Pt 2):669-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00248.x.
PMID: 9310871BACKGROUNDHammarstrom L. Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Sep;24(9 Pt 2):658-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00247.x.
PMID: 9310870BACKGROUNDHeijl L. Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in one human experimental defect. A case report. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Sep;24(9 Pt 2):693-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1997.00693.x.
PMID: 9310874BACKGROUNDDori F, Arweiler NB, Szanto E, Agics A, Gera I, Sculean A. Ten-year results following treatment of intrabony defects with an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with either a natural bone mineral or a beta-tricalcium phosphate. J Periodontol. 2013 Jun;84(6):749-57. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120238. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
PMID: 22873657BACKGROUNDTonetti MS, Fourmousis I, Suvan J, Cortellini P, Bragger U, Lang NP; European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPERIO). Healing, post-operative morbidity and patient perception of outcomes following regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Dec;31(12):1092-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00615.x.
PMID: 15560811BACKGROUNDPolimeni G, Xiropaidis AV, Wikesjo UM. Biology and principles of periodontal wound healing/regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2006;41:30-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00157.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 16686925BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Conventional or minimally invasive surgical technique for the treatment of furcation defects using enamel matrix derivative and anorganic bovine bone - a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2014
First Posted
April 2, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 2, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03