Platelet Reactivity (High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity) as Guidance for APT (Antiplatelet Therapy) Adjustment After PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
1 other identifier
observational
334
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Since thrombus formation is a very complex procedure in vivo, platelet function testing methods in vitro might only reflect the degree of inhibition of platelet from a certain level, which do't reflect the functional status of platelets in vivo adequately. There are a variety of signal transduction pathways involved in the formation of platelet activation and thrombosis. Gurbel et al. first reported individuals with variability on clopidogrel treatment response in 2003, and proposed the concept of clopidogrel resistance. Different patients received the same dose of aspirin or other anti -platelet drug such as clopidogrel , due to various reasons bound to lack some patients antithrombotic efforts to increase the incidence of thrombotic events , while another part of the patient easily understood antithrombotic excessive bleeding events, " antithrombotic individualized treatment , " according to differences in patient against platelet drugs or anticoagulant drug reactions and adjust the treatment plan , is the direction of antithrombotic therapy in the future. There are a number of studies have shown that patients with no response Clopidogrel , measuring the relationship between high platelet reactivity and clinical adverse ischemic events displayed between platelet activity . However, there is still lack of quantitative threshold high platelet reactivity and the risks associated with the clinical consensus . In addition, there are only limited data support, to measure platelet function -based therapy to improve the clinical efficacy of the concept . Over the years, more than 20,000 cases reported in patients with numerous studies confirm that high platelet reactivity after PCI with stent thrombosis , including cardiovascular events , including an increased risk of significant correlation . Pharmacodynamic analysis GRVITAS trial showed significantly lower platelet reactivity associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular events . Brar in more than 3000 cases of patients published in JACC Meta-analysis showed that "high platelet reactivity " of patients whose cardiovascular death, heart attack and stent thrombosis occurred more than twice the rate of " non-high platelet reactivity " patients . Two new anti-platelet drugs (Prasugrel and Ticagrelor) in several recent randomized trials have considerable persuasive , and has included some guidance in the current guidelines. Ticagrelor even more than Prasugrel in pharmacodynamic studies more effectively inhibit platelet , and has a lower risk of bleeding. Cilostazol is an old drug , mostly for the treatment of intermittent claudication , in recent years there are also some testing and coronary stents prevent restenosis after angioplasty , however, so far , there is little direct comparison Cilostazol and Ticagrelor related articles . We designed this test , in addition to testing for high yellow people treat DAPT (dual anti-platelet therapy) under the platelet reactivity (high on-treatment platelet reactivity) ratio , this population of patients with ticagrelor instead for a month or cilostazol treatment after its platelet reactivity changes and compare between the two groups , and even track six months after the bleeding and adverse cardiovascular events rate? Through this test we can compare the treatment for patients with high platelet reactivity of what strategies more appropriate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 25, 2019
CompletedNovember 22, 2019
April 1, 2017
1.3 years
March 28, 2014
November 10, 2017
November 2, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numbers of Participants With MACE(Major Adverse Cardiac Event) of Study Subjects
MACE(major adverse cardiac event) include: death, myocardial infarction, revascularization.
24 months
Study Arms (3)
clopidogrel
treated with cloopidogrel
ticagrelor
treated with ticagrelor
cilostazol
treated with clopidogrel+cilostazol
Interventions
measure by VeryfyNow.
Eligibility Criteria
stable angina who received routine dual antiplatelet agents therapy.
You may qualify if:
- under DAPT (dual antiplatelet therapy) of stable angina patients for elective stent implantation.
- \. DAPT 24 hours, 7d and 30d after treatment PRU (platelet activity units) values. (Drug unresponsive patients was defined as PRU\> 235).
You may not qualify if:
- Not suitable for the treatment of patients with DAPT. (Active peptic ulceration or bleeding) 2 patients of aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, cilostazol medication intolerance.
- contraindications for aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, cilostazol drug usage (such as heart failure patients not suitable for use cilostazol).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taipei City Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Chen YC, Lin FY, Lin YW, Cheng SM, Lin RH, Chuang CL, Sheu JS, Chen SM, Chang CC, Tsai CS. DAPT Plus Cilostazol is Better Than Traditional DAPT or Aspirin Plus Ticagrelor as Elective PCI for Intermediate-to-Highly Complex Cases: Prospective, Randomized, PRU-Based Study in Taiwan. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2019 Feb;19(1):75-86. doi: 10.1007/s40256-018-0302-3.
PMID: 30467686DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- chen yueh-chung
- Organization
- taipei city hospital
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Chen Yueh Chung, chief doctor
taipei city hospital, taipei city goverment
- STUDY CHAIR
Chen Yueh Chung, chief doctor
taipei city hospital, tiapei city goverment
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- chief of ICU
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2014
First Posted
April 2, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 22, 2019
Results First Posted
January 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2017-04