NCT02099344

Brief Summary

Compare Artegraft and Propaten grafts for use in dialysis access to see if one performs better than the other. How long each one lasts until a complication arises or until the graft is no longer used will be compared. The study hypothesis is that the Artegraft, being an actual blood vessel, will work better than the manufactured Propaten graft.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2014

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 13, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 28, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2014

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2014

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 14, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 15, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

November 13, 2013

Results QC Date

December 21, 2015

Last Update Submit

May 3, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary Objective: The Primary Objective is to Assess the Primary, Primary Assisted and Secondary Patency Rate of Each Graft

    The primary outcome will be determined by Kaplan-Meier life table analysis. Patency determination will be from access creation until the first occlusion of the graft.

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Examine Incidence of Complications in Patients Receiving the Artegraft Bovine Graft vs. Gore Propaten Graft

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

Artegraft

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Artegraft® vs Gore® Propaten®. Approximately 50 eligible patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis will be randomized to receive one of these two grafts as part of their standard care.

Device: Artegraft

Propaten

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Artegraft® vs Gore® Propaten®. Approximately 50 eligible patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis will be randomized to receive one of these two grafts as part of their standard care.

Device: Propaten

Interventions

ArtegraftDEVICE

Surgical placement of graft for hemodialysis access

Artegraft
PropatenDEVICE

Surgical placement of graft for hemodialysis access

Propaten

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \> 18 years of age
  • Candidate for hemodialysis
  • Not a candidate for native AV fistula
  • In need of a new AV graft in the upper arm location
  • Artery and vein \> 3mm.
  • Medically stable and have a life expectancy of ≥ 12 months
  • The patient or legal guardian understands the study and is willing to comply with the requirements.

You may not qualify if:

  • \< 18 years of age
  • Current history or within 6 months of IV drug abuse
  • Chronic hypotension (\<100 mm systolic pressure) not responsive to treatment
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Known hypercoagulable state
  • Requires only a revision of an existing graft
  • Receiving artery or vein is less than 3 mm in diameter at the time of implantation
  • Known axillary/subclavian occlusion or stenosis that has not been treated
  • Known or suspected systemic infection
  • Heparin sensitivity (known HIT)
  • Enrolled in another investigational study.
  • Subject has more than 1 graft in target limb.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kaiser Permanente Northwest

Portland, Oregon, 97232, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney Failure, ChronicRenal Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Earl Schuman, MD
Organization
Kaiser Permanente NW

Study Officials

  • Earl Schuman, MD

    Kaiser Permanente

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized to either Combination product- device/biologic Artegraft® or Gore® Propaten®.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2013

First Posted

March 28, 2014

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion

November 1, 2014

Study Completion

November 1, 2014

Last Updated

May 15, 2019

Results First Posted

July 14, 2016

Record last verified: 2019-05

Locations