NCT02098681

Brief Summary

Context: Chest wall deformities in children are relatively common. One such deformity, known as Pectus Excavatum (PE), involves a concavity of the chest and is the most frequent of these abnormalities - present in approximately 1 out of every 400-1000 births. This deformity is often a cosmetic problem for affected individuals. When severe, PE can also be associated with cardiopulmonary compromise. Treatment of PE involves surgical correction. There are several potential methods for correcting PE. In the past the most common repair involved an open procedure which involves excision and reshaping of the ribcage. More recently a minimally invasive procedure has been adopted involving the placement of a stainless steel or titanium bar underneath the sternum to reshape the chest wall. This procedure, commonly known as the Nuss procedure, carries with it significant post-operative pain management problems. In fact, the pain issues after Nuss procedure may be more significant than after open repair. The quality of postoperative pain control in these cases has been shown to affect several measurable objective outcomes during hospitalization including capacity for deep breathing, early mobilization, ambulation, and length of hospital stay. Epidural analgesia (EA) has been one of the standard methods for managing pain in the early postoperative period after PE repair. Unfortunately severe pain may persist after the removal of an epidural catheter resulting in a difficult "transition" period just prior to discharge from the hospital. In addition reports of neurological injury after epidural analgesia for Nuss procedures have appeared. In light of these issues, many institutions have opted for alternative methods of pain control including peripheral nerve blocks, patient controlled analgesia, and wound catheters. There remains significant debate as to which pain control methodology is best. There is little consistent data available on pain control or outcomes that occur after EA is stopped. Moreover there is reluctance in any one institution to trial or randomize patients to a variety of treatment modalities. For all of these reasons, investigators are proposing participation in a multi-institutional data sharing project concerning the repair of EA in which participating centers will collaborate to better understand the outcomes of perioperative care for patients undergoing correction of this problem.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
348

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2014

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 21, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 28, 2014

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 20, 2015

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 22, 2019

Status Verified

April 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

March 21, 2014

Last Update Submit

April 18, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Pectus Excavatum

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Perioperative course and management of children undergoing Pectus Excavatum repair surgery.

    Peri- and Post-Operative Pain Control

    Baseline, Daily up to Three Weeks

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Perioperative course and management of children undergoing Pectus Excavatum repair surgery.

    Baseline

  • Perioperative course and management of children undergoing Pectus Excavatum repair surgery.

    Baseline

  • Perioperative course and management of children undergoing Pectus Excavatum repair surgery.

    Baseline

  • Perioperative course and management of children undergoing Pectus Excavatum repair surgery.

    Baseline

  • Perioperative course and management of children undergoing Pectus Excavatum repair surgery.

    Baseline, up to Three Weeks

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Individuals undergoing surgical procedures on the chest wall region performed to correct Pectus Excavatum deformities.

You may qualify if:

  • Males and females ages 8 to 30 years.
  • Undergoing surgical procedures on the chest wall region performed to correct Pectus Excavatum deformities.

You may not qualify if:

  • None.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Boston Children's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Funnel Chest

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone Diseases, DevelopmentalBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMusculoskeletal AbnormalitiesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Study Officials

  • Joseph P Cravero, MD

    Boston Children's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
3 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Anesthesiologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2014

First Posted

March 28, 2014

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion

October 20, 2015

Study Completion

September 1, 2018

Last Updated

April 22, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-04

Locations