Fluoroscopically-guided Versus Landmark-guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections
Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Comparative-effectiveness Study Comparing Fluoroscopically-guided and Landmark-guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections
1 other identifier
interventional
125
1 country
4
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators are attempting to determine whether intra- or extra-articular injections are more effective; the relative prevalence rate of intra-articular and extra-articular SI joint pain; and the accuracy of extra-articular injections using fluoroscopy as the reference standard. 124 consecutive patients with mechanical low back pain below L5, tenderness overlying the SI joint(s) and at least 3 positive provocative maneuvers will be randomized to receive SI joint injections by 2 different approaches. Group 1 will receive fluoroscopically-guided injections into the joint. Group 2 will receive landmark-guided injections into the tender area around the joint. In order to determine whether the injection in group 2 was intra-articular or extra-articular, an x-ray will be done after the injection to ascertain the location of contrast spread. The primary outcome measure will be pain relief at 1-month. Patients who obtain benefit at 1-month will be followed at 3-months, while those who fail to obtain benefit will exit the study to receive alternative care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 7, 2018
February 1, 2018
3.5 years
March 22, 2014
February 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Average Back Pain at 1 Month Measured Using the Numeric Pain Scale
This outcome measure compares the average back pain at baseline to the average back pain 1 month after the start of treatment. This is measured using the Numeric Pain Scale. The Numeric Pain Scale ranges from 0-10. 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst imaginable pain possible. The group receiving fluoroscopically-guided intra-articular injection is compared to the group receiving landmark-guided injections.
1 month from the start of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Outcomes Related to Disability Measured at 1 Month Using the Oswestry Disability Index
1 month after the start of treatment
Worst Back Pain at 1 Month Measured Using the Numeric Pain Scale
1 month from the start of treatment
Average Back Pain at 3 Months Measured Using the Numeric Pain Scale
3 months from the start of treatment
Worst Back Pain at 3 Months Measured Using the Numeric Pain Scale
3 months after the start of treatment
Outcomes Related to Disability Measured at 3 Month Using the Oswestry Disability Index
3 months after the start of treatment
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
X-ray guided intra-articular injection
EXPERIMENTALInjection of 40 mg depomethylprednisolone and 2 ml 0.5% bupivacaine into the SI (sacroiliac joint) cavity under fluoroscopic guidance
Landmark-guided SI joint injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORInjection of 40 mg depomethylprednisolone and 2 ml 0.5% bupivacaine at the point of maximal tenderness (3 ml)
Interventions
Injection of steroid and local anesthetic into the joint cavity using fluoroscopic guidance
Injection of steroid into the joint area based on palpation. The injection may be inside the joint (intra-articular) or outside the joint in the ligaments (extra-articular)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18;
- Low back pain principally below the L5 vertebra;
- Three out of 6 positive SI joint provocative maneuvers;
- Agreed to undergo SI joint injection for diagnostic/ therapeutic purposes;
- Average pain score \> 3/10 over the past week;
- Pain duration \> 6 weeks;
You may not qualify if:
- Previous SI joint injection;
- Leg pain \> back pain or lower leg pain \> upper leg pain
- Active inflammatory spondyloarthropathy (e.g. ankylosing spondylitis);
- Untreated coagulopathy;
- Allergy to contrast dye or bupivacaine;
- Pain \> 20 years in duration;
- Poorly controlled psychiatric (e.g. PTSD) or medical (congestive heart failure) condition
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciencescollaborator
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Centercollaborator
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Centercollaborator
- United States Naval Medical Center, San Diegocollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Naval Hospital-San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Rockville, Maryland, 20889, United States
Penn State
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Related Publications (2)
Cohen SP, Chen Y, Neufeld NJ. Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2013 Jan;13(1):99-116. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.148.
PMID: 23253394BACKGROUNDCohen SP, Bicket MC, Kurihara C, Griffith SR, Fowler IM, Jacobs MB, Liu R, Anderson White M, Verdun AJ, Hari SB, Fisher RL, Pasquina PF, Vorobeychik Y. Fluoroscopically Guided vs Landmark-Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections: A Randomized Controlled Study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Apr;94(4):628-642. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.038. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
PMID: 30853260DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2014
First Posted
March 26, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share