Neurocognitive Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of Hand Function After Stroke
2 other identifiers
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this project is to clinically evaluate a novel robot-assisted therapeutic approach to train sensorimotor hand function after stroke. It combines the profound experience of the clinic Hildebrand in neurocognitive therapy - involving brain and mind in the task and training both the motor and the sensory system - with the advanced haptic robotic technology of the Rehabilitation Engineering Lab at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), allowing unmet interaction with the hand through the simulation of virtual objects with various mechanical properties. In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 10 sub-acute stroke patients will receive four weeks of robotic therapy sessions, integrated seamlessly into their daily rehabilitation program, while 10 other patients will receive conventional therapy. The investigators will assess baseline performance in an initial clinical and robotic assessment, with another assessment at the end of the four-week period, and in follow-ups four weeks and six months later. The contents of the patient-tailored robotic therapy sessions will match those of the conventional therapy as closely as possible. This study will demonstrate the feasibility of including robotic therapy of hand function into the daily rehabilitation program, and investigate the acceptance from patients and therapists. The investigators expect increased training intensity during the robotic therapy session compared to conventional sessions with similar contents, as well as novel insights into the recovery process of both the motor and the sensory system during the four weeks of therapy, through advanced robotic assessments integrated into the training sessions. This project is a first step towards making such robotic therapy available to patients as integration into the conventional individual therapy program (e.g. for self-training), and towards transferring this technology to the home environment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Apr 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 9, 2017
CompletedJune 12, 2017
June 1, 2017
3.9 years
March 19, 2014
June 9, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (26)
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 6 months
Functional improvement in dexterity
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Functional improvement in dexterity
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Functional improvement in dexterity
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 6 months
- +21 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Robot group
EXPERIMENTALReceive robot-assisted neurocognitive therapy instead of conventional neurocognitive therapy. (4 x 45 min/week)
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORReceive dose-matched conventional neurocognitive therapy
Interventions
2 degrees-of-freedom hand rehabilitation robot to train fine motor skills during grasping and forearm rotation.
Use sensory perception (tactile, proprioception but not vision!) to solve a by the therapist guided (passive) or patient controlled (active) therapy task, e.g. discrimination/identification of different spring resistances, sponges, different sized blocks, etc.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age between 18-90 years old
- hemisyndrome (central paralysis of the upper extremity, and all degrees of weakness: M0 - M5 on the paresis scale) as a result of a first stroke
- sub-acute lesion not more than 6 weeks post ictus
You may not qualify if:
- insufficient state of consciousness
- severe aphasia
- severe cognitive deficits
- severe pathologies of the upper extremity of traumatic or rheumatic nature
- severe pain in the affected arm
- Patients with pacemakers and other active implants
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Roger Gassertlead
Study Sites (1)
Clinica Hildebrand Centro di riabilitazione Brissago
Brissago, Canton Ticino, 6614, Switzerland
Related Publications (3)
Metzger JC, Lambercy O, Califfi A, Conti FM, Gassert R. Neurocognitive robot-assisted therapy of hand function. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2014 Apr-Jun;7(2):140-9. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2013.72.
PMID: 24968378RESULTRanzani R, Lambercy O, Metzger JC, Califfi A, Regazzi S, Dinacci D, Petrillo C, Rossi P, Conti FM, Gassert R. Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 24;17(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00746-7.
PMID: 32831097DERIVEDMetzger JC, Lambercy O, Califfi A, Dinacci D, Petrillo C, Rossi P, Conti FM, Gassert R. Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Nov 15;11:154. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-154.
PMID: 25399249DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Roger Gassert, Prof. Dr.
Rehabilitation Engineering Lab, ETH Zurich
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2014
First Posted
March 26, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 10, 2017
Study Completion
June 9, 2017
Last Updated
June 12, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06