NCT02096445

Brief Summary

The aim of this project is to clinically evaluate a novel robot-assisted therapeutic approach to train sensorimotor hand function after stroke. It combines the profound experience of the clinic Hildebrand in neurocognitive therapy - involving brain and mind in the task and training both the motor and the sensory system - with the advanced haptic robotic technology of the Rehabilitation Engineering Lab at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), allowing unmet interaction with the hand through the simulation of virtual objects with various mechanical properties. In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 10 sub-acute stroke patients will receive four weeks of robotic therapy sessions, integrated seamlessly into their daily rehabilitation program, while 10 other patients will receive conventional therapy. The investigators will assess baseline performance in an initial clinical and robotic assessment, with another assessment at the end of the four-week period, and in follow-ups four weeks and six months later. The contents of the patient-tailored robotic therapy sessions will match those of the conventional therapy as closely as possible. This study will demonstrate the feasibility of including robotic therapy of hand function into the daily rehabilitation program, and investigate the acceptance from patients and therapists. The investigators expect increased training intensity during the robotic therapy session compared to conventional sessions with similar contents, as well as novel insights into the recovery process of both the motor and the sensory system during the four weeks of therapy, through advanced robotic assessments integrated into the training sessions. This project is a first step towards making such robotic therapy available to patients as integration into the conventional individual therapy program (e.g. for self-training), and towards transferring this technology to the home environment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2013

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 19, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 26, 2014

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 10, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 9, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

June 12, 2017

Status Verified

June 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

March 19, 2014

Last Update Submit

June 9, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

strokeacuterehabilitationrobot therapyhand functionfine motor skillsneurocognitivesensoryPerfettihaptics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Motor impairment of the upper limb

    Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)

    Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (26)

  • Motor impairment of the upper limb

    Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 8 weeks

  • Motor impairment of the upper limb

    Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 6 months

  • Functional improvement in dexterity

    Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 4 weeks

  • Functional improvement in dexterity

    Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 8 weeks

  • Functional improvement in dexterity

    Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 6 months

  • +21 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Robot group

EXPERIMENTAL

Receive robot-assisted neurocognitive therapy instead of conventional neurocognitive therapy. (4 x 45 min/week)

Device: robot-assisted neurocognitive therapy of hand function

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Receive dose-matched conventional neurocognitive therapy

Other: Conventional neurocognitive rehabilitation

Interventions

2 degrees-of-freedom hand rehabilitation robot to train fine motor skills during grasping and forearm rotation.

Also known as: Rehabilitation robot ReHapticKnob
Robot group

Use sensory perception (tactile, proprioception but not vision!) to solve a by the therapist guided (passive) or patient controlled (active) therapy task, e.g. discrimination/identification of different spring resistances, sponges, different sized blocks, etc.

Also known as: Perfetti-concept
Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age between 18-90 years old
  • hemisyndrome (central paralysis of the upper extremity, and all degrees of weakness: M0 - M5 on the paresis scale) as a result of a first stroke
  • sub-acute lesion not more than 6 weeks post ictus

You may not qualify if:

  • insufficient state of consciousness
  • severe aphasia
  • severe cognitive deficits
  • severe pathologies of the upper extremity of traumatic or rheumatic nature
  • severe pain in the affected arm
  • Patients with pacemakers and other active implants

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinica Hildebrand Centro di riabilitazione Brissago

Brissago, Canton Ticino, 6614, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Metzger JC, Lambercy O, Califfi A, Conti FM, Gassert R. Neurocognitive robot-assisted therapy of hand function. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2014 Apr-Jun;7(2):140-9. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2013.72.

  • Ranzani R, Lambercy O, Metzger JC, Califfi A, Regazzi S, Dinacci D, Petrillo C, Rossi P, Conti FM, Gassert R. Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 24;17(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00746-7.

  • Metzger JC, Lambercy O, Califfi A, Dinacci D, Petrillo C, Rossi P, Conti FM, Gassert R. Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Nov 15;11:154. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-154.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeParesis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Roger Gassert, Prof. Dr.

    Rehabilitation Engineering Lab, ETH Zurich

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof. Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2014

First Posted

March 26, 2014

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion

March 10, 2017

Study Completion

June 9, 2017

Last Updated

June 12, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-06

Locations