Placebo Effect in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis
Placebo Effect in Atopic Dermatitis - Increase the Pharmacological Effect of Itching Caused by Classical Conditioning and Expectancy Processes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
166
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The study is initiated in the indication of atopic dermatitis to study the impact of placebo in the treatment of pruritus. Classical conditioning and expectation via instructions/anticipation maintain the effect of placebo.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 21, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedSeptember 18, 2015
September 1, 2015
3.2 years
March 17, 2014
September 17, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of the experimental pruritus intensity on a 10-point-rating scale between the groups
The pruritus intensity is assessed at different time points during a time frame of 2 days. The results are compared between the groups.
assessed over a time frame of 2 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change of the severity of atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) and comparison between the groups
assessed over a time frame of 2 days
Changes of Wheal sizes experimentally provoked by skin prick test.
assessed over a time frame of 2 days
Changes of clinical, atopic itch intensity on a 10-point-rating scale
assessed over a time frame of 2 days
Study Arms (4)
verum, instruction, conditioning
EXPERIMENTALThis group received dimetindene and instructions about dimetindene and its effectiveness. One classical conditioning process with saline was applied during the skin prick test procedures.
verum, instruction, no conditioning
EXPERIMENTALThis group received dimetindene and instructions about dimetindene and its effectiveness. No conditioning process were applied
placebo, instruction, conditioning
EXPERIMENTALThis group received a placebo (saline) as intravenously administered substance. But instructions about receiving dimetindene and its effectiveness were given. One classical conditioning process was applied during the skin prick test procedures.
verum, no instruction, no conditioning
EXPERIMENTALDimetindene was covertly administered (unawareness of treatment). No instruction and no conditioning were given.
Interventions
receiving either dimetindene or a placebo (saline) via infusion
information about the drug dimetindene and its efficacy versus no information and unawareness of treatment influencing expectations of an efficient treatment
classical conditioning; experiencing and observing the efficiency of a drug manipulated by a conditioning process versus no learning experience.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- SCORAD-Score \< 50 points
- basic experimental pruritus \>= 3 points on a numeric rating scale
- no acute eczema on their forearms
- no systemic treatments for skin diseases for at least four weeks
- no topical treatment on their arms for at least two weeks
You may not qualify if:
- intake of antihistamines
- pregnancy and lactation
- serious dysfunctions of the liver, kidneys or thyroid
- prostatic hyperplasia
- patients with tumors, major cardiovascular diseases, immunosuppression
- glaucoma
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Margitta Wormlead
- University of Hamburg-Eppendorfcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Berlin, 10117, Germany
University of Hamburg
Hamburg, 20146, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Margitta Worm, Prof. Dr.
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2014
First Posted
March 21, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09