Informed Decision Users of the Health System and Participation in Organized Screening for Breast Cancer
DECIDEO
1 other identifier
interventional
16,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to assess the impact of a decision aid leaflet on the participation of women invited to participate in the French national breast cancer screening program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable healthy
Started May 2009
Typical duration for not_applicable healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2014
CompletedMarch 20, 2014
March 1, 2014
1.1 years
March 19, 2014
March 19, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
women's attendance rate for the breast cancer screening program during the 12 months following the invitation
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
the delay between the invitation and the date of attendance for breast cancer screening
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Decision aid group
EXPERIMENTALWomen allocated to the decision aid group received an invitation to participate in the national breast cancer screening program and the specially-designed decision aid (a leaflet), by mail.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONWomen in the control group received an invitation and the usual standard information by mail.
Interventions
The paper-based leaflet DECIDEO is a 12-page pocket leaflet providing scientific information about the advantages and disadvantages of participating in the national breast screening program, understandable by all, constructed to conform with the International Patient Decision Aid Standards
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women, aged between 50 and 74 years old living in 11 French departments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270, France
Related Publications (8)
Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, Ferlay J. Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008. Int J Cancer. 2013 Mar 1;132(5):1133-45. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27711. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
PMID: 22752881BACKGROUNDOlsson S, Andersson I, Karlberg I, Bjurstam N, Frodis E, Hakansson S. Implementation of service screening with mammography in Sweden: from pilot study to nationwide programme. J Med Screen. 2000;7(1):14-8. doi: 10.1136/jms.7.1.14.
PMID: 10807141BACKGROUNDWalter LC, Lewis CL. Maximizing informed cancer screening decisions. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22;167(19):2027-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2027. No abstract available.
PMID: 17954794BACKGROUNDRaffle AE. Informed participation in screening is essential. BMJ. 1997 Jun 14;314(7096):1762-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7096.1762a. No abstract available.
PMID: 9202520BACKGROUNDBarratt A, Trevena L, Davey HM, McCaffery K. Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening. BMJ. 2004 Aug 28;329(7464):507-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7464.507.
PMID: 15331483BACKGROUNDElwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T; International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
PMID: 16908462BACKGROUNDMathieu E, Barratt A, Davey HM, McGeechan K, Howard K, Houssami N. Informed choice in mammography screening: a randomized trial of a decision aid for 70-year-old women. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22;167(19):2039-46. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2039.
PMID: 17954796BACKGROUNDEdwards A, Unigwe S, Elwyn G, Hood K. Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review. BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):703-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.703.
PMID: 14512475BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Franck CHAUVIN, MDPhD
Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2014
First Posted
March 20, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2010
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
March 20, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03