How Environmental Interventions Influence Behavior in School Lunchrooms
Evaluating the Impact on Lunch Sales and Consumption of New School Lunch Guidelines and Behavioral Interventions in NYC Schools
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that the new United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) regulations for lunches served as part of the National School Lunch Program will decrease the percentage of enrolled students purchasing lunch, increase the percentage of children taking fruit and vegetables, decrease the percentage of fruit and vegetable servings being thrown away, and increase the total number of fruit and vegetable servings eaten. The investigators also hypothesize that when the regulations are in force, simple behavioral interventions can counteract the potentially negative impact on lunch sales and consumption. In other words, implementing the regulations and behavioral interventions together, the percentage of enrolled students taking a school lunch will increase at least back to baseline levels, the percentage of children taking fruits and vegetables will increase, the percentage of fruit and vegetable servings wasted will decrease, and the total number of fruit and vegetable servings eaten will increase.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2014
CompletedFebruary 7, 2022
January 1, 2022
2 months
March 3, 2014
January 24, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in percent fruit or vegetable waste by student
In the twelve schools, tray waste data were collected twice in April 2012 and once in May 2012. Results were generated and reported in September 2012.
Six months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in lunch sales
Six months
Other Outcomes (1)
Change in servings of fruits and vegetables taken
Six months
Study Arms (4)
USDA Regulations Only
EXPERIMENTALImplement USDA Regulations in assigned school cafeterias during the intervention period.
USDA Regulations and Marketing Kit
EXPERIMENTALImplement new USDA regulations in assigned schools along with the Marketing Kit during the intervention period.
USDA Regulations and SLM
EXPERIMENTALImplement USDA Regulations and Smarter Lunchrooms Makeover in assigned schools during intervention period.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONSchools assigned to this intervention made no changes to their lunchroom or menus.
Interventions
Implement new USDA regulations assigned school cafeterias. 1. Fruit or vegetable on every tray 2. Meet requirements for vegetable varieties 3. 50% of all grains must be whole grain 4. Milk must be 1% or skim; flavored milk must be skim
This marketing tool kit is designed to encourage purchasing of school lunches. The marketing tool kit included the following components: 1. 56''x72'' vinyl sign with the words "\[school mascot\] Cafe" 2. 8.5''x11'' signs describing the foods offered on a specific day 3. 2''x4'' signs used to name all foods. These were to be placed in a visible location near the corresponding food. 4. Magnetic board displaying a tray onto which magnets shaped as food can be placed to show what foods were being offered during a specific lunch shift.
Implement three basic Smarter Lunchrooms techniques. It consists of the following components: 1. Place fruit in an attractive bowl or serving dish and set on two places on the line. One of the places should be at or near the register. 2. Give all vegetables descriptive names and write or type them on a 2''x4'' card. These cards should be visible and placed near the corresponding food. 3. Make white milk the most prominent milk in the milk coolers by making it the most available milk and easiest to take.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Public schools with any combination of grades K-12
You may not qualify if:
- No point of sale system in school
- Satellite school
- Feeder school
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cornell Universitylead
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
New York City School District
New York, New York, United States
Related Publications (4)
Hanks AS, Wansink B, Just DR. Reliability and accuracy of real-time visualization techniques for measuring school cafeteria tray waste: validating the quarter-waste method. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Mar;114(3):470-474. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
PMID: 24135053BACKGROUNDHanks AS, Just DR, Wansink B. Smarter lunchrooms can address new school lunchroom guidelines and childhood obesity. J Pediatr. 2013 Apr;162(4):867-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.12.031. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
PMID: 23434267BACKGROUNDWansink B, Just DR, Hanks AS, Smith LE. Pre-sliced fruit in school cafeterias: children's selection and intake. Am J Prev Med. 2013 May;44(5):477-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.003.
PMID: 23597811BACKGROUNDHanks AS, Just DR, Smith LE, Wansink B. Healthy convenience: nudging students toward healthier choices in the lunchroom. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Aug;34(3):370-6. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds003. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
PMID: 22294661BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adam Brumberg, BA
Cornell University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kathryn Hoy, RD, MFN
Cornell University
- STUDY CHAIR
David Just, PhD
Cornell University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Brian Wansink, PhD
Cornell University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Hanks, PhD
Cornell University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2014
First Posted
March 19, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
February 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01