Treatment Response of Injectafer vs Oral Iron to Baseline Hepcidin Levels in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA) Secondary to Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) or Gastric Bypass
Multicenter Randomized Open-label Controlled Study to Investigate Treatment Response of IV Injectafer vs Oral Iron to Baseline Hepcidin Levels in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia Secondary to Inflammatory Bowel Disease or Gastric Bypass
1 other identifier
interventional
198
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the treatment response of Injectafer vs. oral iron to baseline hepcidin levels to determine if any of these select IBD or Gastric Bypass patients may demonstrate to be inappropriate for oral iron therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 17, 2020
CompletedSeptember 17, 2020
September 1, 2020
2.5 years
March 12, 2014
December 11, 2017
September 16, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Correlation Between Screening Hepcidin and Change in Hemoglobin From Baseline to Highest Observed Hemoglobin Change (Proportion of Responders).
Responders were defined as subjects achieving an increase from baseline ≥2 g/dL at anytime between baseline and the end of the study (Day 28). The relation between screening hepcidin and change in hemoglobin was assessed with regression models with baseline hepcidin and treatment group as independent factors. Treatment group differences (oral vs. IV iron) for mean changes in endpoints were assessed with the analysis of covariance with a fixed factor for treatment and baseline value as covariate. Treatment group differences for proportions were assessed with the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
anytime between baseline and end of study (day 28) or time of intervention
Study Arms (2)
Injectafer
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2 doses of Injectafer, at 15 mg/kg for a maximum single dose of 750 mg given on Days 0 and 7 for a total of up to 1500 mg
Ferrous Sulfate tablets
ACTIVE COMPARATOROral Ferrous Sulfate at 325 mg (1 tablet) three times a day for 28 days
Interventions
2 doses of Injectafer, at 15mg/kg for a maximum single dose of 750mg given on days 0 and 7 for a total of up to 1500mg
325mg (1 tablet) three times a day for 28 days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent
- Male or female subjects ≥ 18 years of age with clinical diagnosis of IDA secondary to IBD or Gastric Bypass
- Screening Hemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 11g/dL
- Screening Ferritin ≤ 100 ng/mL
- Female subjects who are of childbearing age must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and be practicing an acceptable method of birth control during the study
You may not qualify if:
- Hypersensitivity reaction to any component of IV Injectafer or oral iron
- Requires dialysis for treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD)
- During the 30 day period prior to screening has been treated with IV iron
- No evidence of iron deficiency
- During the 30 day period prior to screening has been treated with a red blood cell transfusion.
- Any non-viral infection
- Known positive hepatitis with evidence of active disease
- Received an investigational drug within 30 days of screening
- Alcohol or drug abuse within the past 6 months
- Hemochromatosis or other iron storage disorders
- Pregnant
- Any other laboratory abnormality, medical condition, or psychiatric disorders which in the opinion of the Investigator would put the subject's disease management at risk or may result in the subject being unable to comply with the study requirements
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was stopped early due to slow enrollment, however it was not considered prematurely terminated. A total of 198 of the 400 subjects planned were randomized, 196 were treated, and the study concluded normally.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Angelia Butcher
- Organization
- Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mark A Falone, MD
American Regent, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2014
First Posted
March 13, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 16, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 17, 2020
Results First Posted
September 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share