Study Stopped
Lack of scientific interest
Ultrasound Assisted Puncture of AV Fistulas in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The puncture of the vascular access in hemodialysis patients remains challenging even in the hands of experienced dialysis nurses. Unsuccessful punctures are associated with resource wastage, traumatism of the AV shunts, shortening of the effective dialysis time and poor patient satisfaction. The use of ultrasound by emergency department nurses and technicians without prior ultrasound experience in patients with difficult intravenous access showed in several studies to be very efficient. The investigators expect to achieve similar results in cannulation of AV shunts by the dialysis nurse staff after a short learning program. To show this, the investigators aim to conduct a trail where standard cannulation technique (inspection, palpation) will be compared with the ultrasound-assisted method in terms of efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Aug 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2018
CompletedJanuary 30, 2023
January 1, 2023
9 months
March 3, 2014
January 26, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of successful cannulations of an AV-fistula
Satisfactory puncture of the fistula defined as the ability to achieve a full length dialysis (max. 10% reduction of the usual dialysis time), double-needle, and the usual blood flow rate (max. 15% reduction of the usual blood flow)
Immediately after the cannulation, expected to be after 10 minutes on average
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Effective dialysis time
Directly after the treatment, expected to be after 3 to 4.5 hours
Processed volume
Directly after the treatment, expected to be after 3 to 4.5 hours
Number of patients with late complications
At the following dialysis session, expected to be after 2-3 days
Patient satisfaction
Immediately after the canulation, expected to be after 10 minutes on average, and at the following dialysis session, expected to be after 2-3 days
Study Arms (2)
Ultrasound-assisted puncture
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound-assisted puncture by the nursing staff of patients with difficult AV-shunts.
Standard
OTHERClassical method wtih inspection and palpation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Forearm or upper arm AV-shunt (native, mixed, graft)
- Patients with recognized difficult vascular access at any time (potentially each patient)
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Recent AV-shunt surgery (\< 48 h)
- Presence of large bandages or severe skin lesions in the area of interest
- Inability to understand the aim of the study and to give a written informed consent
- Single needle
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Feldman HI, Kobrin S, Wasserstein A. Hemodialysis vascular access morbidity. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Apr;7(4):523-35. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V74523.
PMID: 8724885BACKGROUNDHakim R, Himmelfarb J. Hemodialysis access failure: a call to action. Kidney Int. 1998 Oct;54(4):1029-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00122.x.
PMID: 9767519BACKGROUNDSaudan P, Kossovsky M, Halabi G, Martin PY, Perneger TV; Western Switzerland Dialysis Study Group. Quality of care and survival of haemodialysed patients in western Switzerland. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Jun;23(6):1975-81. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm915. Epub 2007 Dec 22.
PMID: 18156654BACKGROUNDBrannam L, Blaivas M, Lyon M, Flake M. Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1361-3. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.027.
PMID: 15576530BACKGROUNDBauman M, Braude D, Crandall C. Ultrasound-guidance vs. standard technique in difficult vascular access patients by ED technicians. Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Feb;27(2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.02.005.
PMID: 19371518BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert M Kalicki, MD
Universitätsklinik für Nephrologie, Hypertonie und Klinische Pharmakologie, Inselspital Bern
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2014
First Posted
March 12, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 1, 2018
Study Completion
May 1, 2018
Last Updated
January 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01