NCT02083172

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the agreement between hemodynamic measurements obtained using the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM®; USCOM Ltd., Sydney, Australia), and reference standards as determined by 2 Dimensional echocardiography (2D-echo) measurements in a group of hemodynamically stable and unstable pediatric patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
78

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 25, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 11, 2014

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2014

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 16, 2016

Status Verified

November 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

November 25, 2013

Last Update Submit

March 14, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

USCOM (UltraSound Cardiac Output Monitor)2D echocardiographyagreementpediatrics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Agreement in hemodynamic measurements obtained by USCOM and 2D-Echo respectively, in hemodynamically stable children

    Hemodynamic measurements are include cardiac output (CO), Stroke Volume (SV),Aortic cross sectional area (Ao CSA), Preload (SVV%) Inferior Vena cava Collapsibility index (IVC), Inotropy (SMI) and (EF)

    Within 30 minutes of first measurement method

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Agreement in hemodynamic measurements obtained by USCOM and 2D-Echo, in hemodynamically unstable children, and children receiving positive pressure ventilation respectively

    Within 30 minutes of first measurement method

Study Arms (3)

Hemodynamically stable patients

Hemodynamically stable patients will be defined as patients with normal hemodynamic profile as evidenced by normal age-determined vital signs and normal perfusion.

Device: Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor and 2 D-Echo

Hemodynamically unstable patients

Hemodynamically unstable patients will be defined as patients who are admitted to the Pediatric Critical Care Unit (PCCU), in whom there is a clinical diagnosis of shock as evidenced by signs and symptoms of hypoperfusion, requiring fluid resuscitation and/or inotropic support.

Device: Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor and 2 D-Echo

Mechanically ventilated patients

Patients requiring mechanical ventilation

Device: Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor and 2 D-Echo

Interventions

Hemodynamic measurements obtained by 2D-Echo and USCOM will be compared.

Also known as: USCOM
Hemodynamically stable patientsHemodynamically unstable patientsMechanically ventilated patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Month - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

1. The hemodynamically stable group: will be screened from pediatric in-patients on McMaster Children's Hospital general pediatric wards and those scheduled for elective 2D-echo through cardiology and sedation clinic. 2. The hemodynamically unstable patients and 3. those requiring mechanical ventilation will be screened from McMaster Children's Hospital Pediatric Critical Care Unit.

You may qualify if:

  • Age under 18 years
  • Patient fulfills clinical criteria for either study cohort
  • Most Responsible Physician has ordered an ECHO study on the patient
  • Written informed consent by parents/legal guardian/substitute decision maker, and assent where appropriate
  • Patients with normal cardiac structure, no pre-existing primary cardiovascular disease or hemodynamically insignificant shunt lesions (i.e. hemodynamically insignificant Atrial Septal Defect/Patent Foramen Oval and Ventricular Septal Defect

You may not qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Premature infants (born \<37 weeks gestation) admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
  • Known co-existing primary cardiac anomalies (i.e. aortic or pulmonary valve stenosis or regurgitation, Aortic Valve regurgitation, shunt lesions save for those mentioned above, and pericardial effusion)
  • Prior enrollment in study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

McMaster Children's Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada

Location

Related Publications (41)

  • Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1303-10. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002.

    PMID: 11445675BACKGROUND
  • Odetola FO, Gebremariam A, Freed GL. Patient and hospital correlates of clinical outcomes and resource utilization in severe pediatric sepsis. Pediatrics. 2007 Mar;119(3):487-94. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2353.

    PMID: 17332201BACKGROUND
  • Parrillo JE, Parker MM, Natanson C, Suffredini AF, Danner RL, Cunnion RE, Ognibene FP. Septic shock in humans. Advances in the understanding of pathogenesis, cardiovascular dysfunction, and therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Aug 1;113(3):227-42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-3-227.

    PMID: 2197912BACKGROUND
  • Zanotti-Cavazzoni SL, Hollenberg SM. Cardiac dysfunction in severe sepsis and septic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Oct;15(5):392-7. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283307a4e.

    PMID: 19633546BACKGROUND
  • Kumar A, Haery C, Parrillo JE. Myocardial dysfunction in septic shock. Crit Care Clin. 2000 Apr;16(2):251-87. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70110-x.

    PMID: 10768082BACKGROUND
  • Brierley J, Carcillo JA, Choong K, Cornell T, Decaen A, Deymann A, Doctor A, Davis A, Duff J, Dugas MA, Duncan A, Evans B, Feldman J, Felmet K, Fisher G, Frankel L, Jeffries H, Greenwald B, Gutierrez J, Hall M, Han YY, Hanson J, Hazelzet J, Hernan L, Kiff J, Kissoon N, Kon A, Irazuzta J, Lin J, Lorts A, Mariscalco M, Mehta R, Nadel S, Nguyen T, Nicholson C, Peters M, Okhuysen-Cawley R, Poulton T, Relves M, Rodriguez A, Rozenfeld R, Schnitzler E, Shanley T, Kache S, Skippen P, Torres A, von Dessauer B, Weingarten J, Yeh T, Zaritsky A, Stojadinovic B, Zimmerman J, Zuckerberg A. Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):666-88. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819323c6.

    PMID: 19325359BACKGROUND
  • Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, Peterson E, Tomlanovich M; Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1368-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010307.

    PMID: 11794169BACKGROUND
  • Kern JW, Shoemaker WC. Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug;30(8):1686-92. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200208000-00002.

    PMID: 12163777BACKGROUND
  • Lapostolle F, Petrovic T, Catineau J, Lenoir G, Adnet F. Training emergency physicians to perform out-of-hospital ultrasonography. Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;23(4):572. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.01.008. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16032640BACKGROUND
  • Stewart GM, Nguyen HB, Kim TY, Jauregui J, Hayes SR, Corbett S. Inter-rater reliability for noninvasive measurement of cardiac function in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Jul;24(7):433-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31817de143.

    PMID: 18580818BACKGROUND
  • Meyer S, Todd D, Shadboldt B. Assessment of portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor) for cardiac output measurements in neonates. J Paediatr Child Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;45(7-8):464-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01535.x.

    PMID: 19712182BACKGROUND
  • Critchley LA, Peng ZY, Fok BS, Lee A, Phillips RA. Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg. 2005 Mar;100(3):748-753. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000144774.42408.05.

    PMID: 15728064BACKGROUND
  • Su BC, Yu HP, Yang MW, Lin CC, Kao MC, Chang CH, Lee WC. Reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in recipients of living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2008 Jul;14(7):1029-37. doi: 10.1002/lt.21461.

    PMID: 18581505BACKGROUND
  • He SR, Zhang C, Liu YM, Sun YX, Zhuang J, Chen JM, Madigan VM, Smith BE, Sun X. Accuracy of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in healthy term neonates during postnatal circulatory adaptation. Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Aug;124(15):2284-9.

    PMID: 21933558BACKGROUND
  • Brierley J, Peters MJ. Distinct hemodynamic patterns of septic shock at presentation to pediatric intensive care. Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122(4):752-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1979.

    PMID: 18829798BACKGROUND
  • van Lelyveld-Haas LE, van Zanten AR, Borm GF, Tjan DH. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Nov;25(11):917-24. doi: 10.1017/S0265021508004882. Epub 2008 Jul 24.

    PMID: 18652712BACKGROUND
  • Tan HL, Pinder M, Parsons R, Roberts B, van Heerden PV. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Mar;94(3):287-91. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei054. Epub 2005 Jan 14.

    PMID: 15653709BACKGROUND
  • Chand R, Mehta Y, Trehan N. Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2006 Jun;20(3):315-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2005.05.024. Epub 2006 Jan 18.

    PMID: 16750729BACKGROUND
  • Deep A, Goonasekera CD, Wang Y, Brierley J. Evolution of haemodynamics and outcome of fluid-refractory septic shock in children. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Sep;39(9):1602-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3003-z. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

    PMID: 23812341BACKGROUND
  • Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):17-60. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2. Epub 2007 Dec 4.

    PMID: 18058085BACKGROUND
  • Zheng ML, Sun X, Zhong J, He SR, Pan W, Pang CC, Sun YX, Liu YM. [Clinical study of neonatal cardiac output measurement methods]. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jan;51(1):58-63. Chinese.

    PMID: 23527933BACKGROUND
  • Wongsirimetheekul T, Khositseth A, Lerbunrian R. (2013). Noninvasive cardiac output assessment in critically ill pediatric patients [poster]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 187: A3686.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lichtenthal PR, Sloniger JA, Copeland JG. (2007) USCOM non-invasive Doppler cardiac output: Are measurements accurate in infants and children? Anesthesiology 107: A1528.

    BACKGROUND
  • Eguchi JH,Mathur M,Larsen R,et al.Ultrasound cardiac output monitor measurement in pediatric cardiac transplant patients.J Heart Lung Transplant,2007,26 (2):S136.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lichtenthal PR, Phillips RA, Sloniger JA, et al. (2006) USCOM non-invasive Doppler: Are cardiac output measurements accurate in both infants and adults? Anesthesiology 105: A466

    BACKGROUND
  • Phillips RA, Paradisis M, Evans NJ, et al. (2006) Validation of USCOM CO measurements in preterm neonates by comparison with echocardiography. Crit Care Med 10(S1): 144-343

    BACKGROUND
  • Patel N, Dodsworth M, Mills JF. Cardiac output measurement in newborn infants using the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: an assessment of agreement with conventional echocardiography, repeatability and new user experience. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011 May;96(3):F206-11. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.170704. Epub 2010 Jul 6.

    PMID: 20605971BACKGROUND
  • Nguyen HB, Banta DP, Stewart G, Kim T, Bansal R, Anholm J, Wittlake WA, Corbett SW. Cardiac index measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography in adult and pediatric emergency patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2010 Jun;24(3):237-47. doi: 10.1007/s10877-010-9240-6. Epub 2010 Jun 20.

    PMID: 20563629BACKGROUND
  • Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, Tomaske M, Stutz K, Nagdyman N, Balmer C, Schmitz A, Bettex D, Berger F, Bauersfeld U, Weiss M. Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jun;34(6):1060-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1030-y. Epub 2008 Feb 23.

    PMID: 18297271BACKGROUND
  • Jain S, Allins A, Salim A, Vafa A, Wilson MT, Margulies DR. Noninvasive Doppler ultrasonography for assessing cardiac function: can it replace the Swan-Ganz catheter? Am J Surg. 2008 Dec;196(6):961-7; discussion 967-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.039.

    PMID: 19095116BACKGROUND
  • Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, Solomon SD, Spencer KT, Sutton MS, Stewart WJ; Chamber Quantification Writing Group; American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee; European Association of Echocardiography. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Dec;18(12):1440-63. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16376782BACKGROUND
  • Krause I, Birk E, Davidovits M, Cleper R, Blieden L, Pinhas L, Gamzo Z, Eisenstein B. Inferior vena cava diameter: a useful method for estimation of fluid status in children on haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001 Jun;16(6):1203-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/16.6.1203.

    PMID: 11390721BACKGROUND
  • Kosiak W, Swieton D, Piskunowicz M. Sonographic inferior vena cava/aorta diameter index, a new approach to the body fluid status assessment in children and young adults in emergency ultrasound--preliminary study. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Mar;26(3):320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.07.012.

    PMID: 18358944BACKGROUND
  • Chen L, Kim Y, Santucci KA. Use of ultrasound measurement of the inferior vena cava diameter as an objective tool in the assessment of children with clinical dehydration. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(10):841-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.040.

    PMID: 17898246BACKGROUND
  • Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 6;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.

    PMID: 20053272BACKGROUND
  • Meyer S, Todd D, Wright I, Gortner L, Reynolds G. Review article: Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output with portable continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound. Emerg Med Australas. 2008 Jun;20(3):201-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01078.x. Epub 2008 Apr 9.

    PMID: 18400002BACKGROUND
  • Levy JA, Noble VE. Bedside ultrasound in pediatric emergency medicine. Pediatrics. 2008 May;121(5):e1404-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1816.

    PMID: 18450883BACKGROUND
  • Barnett SB, Ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC, Rott HD, Duck FA, Maeda K. International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000 Mar;26(3):355-66. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(00)00204-0.

    PMID: 10773365BACKGROUND
  • Hershkovitz R, Sheiner E, Mazor M. Ultrasound in obstetrics: a review of safety. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Feb 10;101(1):15-8. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00469-9.

    PMID: 11803093BACKGROUND
  • Schratz LM, Meyer RA, Schwartz DC. Serial intracoronary ultrasound in children: feasibility, reproducibility, limitations, and safety. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002 Aug;15(8):782-90. doi: 10.1067/mje.2002.119911.

    PMID: 12174347BACKGROUND
  • Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med. 1987 Oct 22;317(17):1098. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198710223171717. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3657876BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Karen Choong, MD,BCh,MSc

    McMaster University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor, Departments of Pediatrics and Critical Care

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2013

First Posted

March 11, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2015

Study Completion

January 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 16, 2016

Record last verified: 2015-11

Locations