NCT02082366

Brief Summary

The aim of the investigators study is to analyze the incidence of MES by TCD performed during AF ablation with the nMARQ and to compare is with the incidence of MES using a conventional irrigated ablation catheter. Objective: To investigate the incidence of MES on TCD during AF ablation with the nMARQ catheter compared to a conventional irrigated ablation catheter. Following inclusion, patients will be randomized into 2 equal different treatment groups: PVI with traditional irrigated RF catheter versus PVI using the nMARQ catheter. In all patients, anticoagulation therapy with warfarin is discontinued five-days before the procedure and low molecular weight heparin is initiated at that time. A CT-scan of the left atrium is performed and imported into the Carto 3 mapping system. The ablation procedure is conducted under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. A decapolar catheter is positioned in the coronary sinus and a quadripolar catheter is positioned at the His bundle level through the right femoral vein. Two 8F sheaths are introduced into the left atrium with double trans-septal puncture performed under fluoroscopic, trans-esophageal echocardiographic or intracardiac echocardiography guidance. Upon completion of the first trans-septal puncture, intravenous heparin is administered to maintain an activated clotting time of 350 seconds throughout the procedure. A variable Lasso circular mapping catheter is introduced through the SL1 sheath into each pulmonary vein for electrical mapping. After the second trans-septal puncture, a Navistar Thermocool 3.5mm irrigated ablation catheter or an nMARQ circular irrigated ablation catheter are introduced into the left atrium. Of note, in case of use the nMARQ catheter, the second SL-1 sheath is replaced by a steerable 8F agilis sheath after the second trans-septal puncture. Each of the 4 PVs are imaged by selective angiograms. The left atrium geometry is created using the nMARQ catheter or the Navistar catheter and then merged with the pre-acquired CT scan of the left atrium and PVs. Identification of true MESs will be possible using an event detector system, in addition to determining whether the MESs are attributed to a solid or to a gaseous embolus. Total MES counts will be collected and evaluated separately during different stages of the procedure.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2014

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 6, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 10, 2014

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

July 7, 2016

Status Verified

July 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

March 6, 2014

Last Update Submit

July 6, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Atrial fibrillationCPVITCDnMARQMESmicroembolic signals

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of microembolic signals during CPVI

    During procedure - 4 hours

Study Arms (2)

conventional irrigated ablation catheter

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

TCD testing during procedure from trans-septal puncture until completion using a conventional irrigated ablation catheter. Intervention: TCD monitoring of microembolic signal during procedure

Device: TCD monitoring of microembolic signal during procedure

nMARQ circumferential irrigated catheter

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

TCD testing during procedure from trans-septal puncture until completion using the nMARQ circumferential irrigated catheter. Intervention: TCD monitoring of microembolic signal during procedure

Device: TCD monitoring of microembolic signal during procedure

Interventions

monitoring of microembolic signal during procedure

conventional irrigated ablation catheternMARQ circumferential irrigated catheter

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for highly symptomatic, drug refractory paroxysmal or persistent AF.
  • Above 18 years of age
  • Following the signing of informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Special populations
  • Chronic Atrial fibrillation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Tel Aviv Medical Center

Tel Aviv, Israel

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Rephael Rosso, MD

    Tel Aviv Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
R&D Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2014

First Posted

March 10, 2014

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion

January 1, 2015

Study Completion

March 1, 2015

Last Updated

July 7, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations