Prospective Clinical Utility Study to Assess the Impact of Decipher on Treatment Decisions After Surgery
PRO-IMPACT
PROspective Study of the IMPACT of Decipher™ Prostate Cancer Classifier on Physician and Patient Treatment Consideration and Decisions Following Radical Prostatectomy [PRO-IMPACT]
1 other identifier
interventional
286
1 country
19
Brief Summary
The influence of Decipher test on urologist and patient treatment plan choices immediately post RP and at the time of PSA rise or BCR
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started May 2014
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 27, 2017
February 1, 2017
2.8 years
February 18, 2014
February 24, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants for which the Decipher test changes the urologist's and patient's treatment plan choices
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Measure the number of participants for which treatment was Increased or decreased in the intensity.
3 months
The number of different treatment plans most influenced by Decipher as a measure of clinical utility
12 months
Comparison of type of treatment plans between high risk and low risk patients
6 months
Account for the number of specific treatment assignments that correlated with a change in treatment recommendation
12 months
Frequency of follow visits as a measure of reproducibility
12 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Salvage setting
OTHERThe clinical utility of Decipher will be evaluated for patients meeting the inclusion criteria in the salvage setting: post-RP with evidence of PSA rise or BCR (defined as PSA detectable and rising on 2 or more subsequent determinations)
Adjuvant setting
OTHERThe clinical utility of Decipher will be evaluated for patients in the adjuvant setting: within 12 months after surgery (in the absence of detectable PSA rise of BCR)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pathological T3 stage of disease (i.e., EPE or SVI), or
- Positive surgical margins, or
- Detectable PSA, defined as PSA detectable and rising on 2 or more subsequent determinations
You may not qualify if:
- For adjuvant setting patients: Metastatic Disease (M+) prior to surgery
- For salvage setting patients: Metastatic Disease at PSA rise
- Failure of PSA to nadir after surgery
- Received any neo-adjuvant prostate cancer treatment before radical prostatectomy
- Received any adjuvant chemotherapy
- Required patient clinical data is not available for evaluation of eligibility criteria
- For adjuvant setting patients, any treatment received after surgery
- For salvage setting patients, lack of documented treatment or management recommendation on file
- Tissue specimen is inadequate for sampling and analysis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GenomeDx Biosciences Corplead
- Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO)collaborator
Study Sites (19)
Alaska Urology Institute Alaska Clinical Research Center
Anchorage, Alaska, 99503, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
University of Colorado, Denver Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
The Urology Center of Colorado
Denver, Colorado, 80211, United States
Urological Research Network
Hialeah, Florida, 33016, United States
Lakeland Regional Health Systems
Lakeland, Florida, 33805, United States
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, 33101, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Spectrum Health Medical Group
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49546, United States
Delaware Valley Urology, LLC
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043, United States
Carolina Urology Partners
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28054, United States
Lancaster Urology
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111, United States
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 753910-9110, United States
Huntsman Cancer Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States
University of Vermont Medical Center
Burlington, Vermont, 05401, United States
Virginia Urology
Richmond, Virginia, 23235, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Related Publications (13)
Nguyen PL, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, Choueiri TK, Choi WW, Lei Y, Hoffman KE, Hu JC. Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 20;29(12):1517-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.1217. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
PMID: 21402604BACKGROUNDSwanson GP, Basler JW. Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy. J Cancer. 2010 Dec 7;2:1-19.
PMID: 21197260BACKGROUNDSilberstein JL, Vickers AJ, Power NE, Fine SW, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Laudone VP. Reverse stage shift at a tertiary care center: escalating risk in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2011 Nov 1;117(21):4855-60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26132. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
PMID: 21484780BACKGROUNDThompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, Lucia MS, Miller G, Troyer D, Messing E, Forman J, Chin J, Swanson G, Canby-Hagino E, Crawford ED. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):956-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.032. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
PMID: 19167731BACKGROUNDBolla M, van Poppel H, Tombal B, Vekemans K, Da Pozzo L, de Reijke TM, Verbaeys A, Bosset JF, van Velthoven R, Colombel M, van de Beek C, Verhagen P, van den Bergh A, Sternberg C, Gasser T, van Tienhoven G, Scalliet P, Haustermans K, Collette L; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Radiation Oncology and Genito-Urinary Groups. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet. 2012 Dec 8;380(9858):2018-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61253-7. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
PMID: 23084481BACKGROUNDWiegel T, Bottke D, Steiner U, Siegmann A, Golz R, Storkel S, Willich N, Semjonow A, Souchon R, Stockle M, Rube C, Weissbach L, Althaus P, Rebmann U, Kalble T, Feldmann HJ, Wirth M, Hinke A, Hinkelbein W, Miller K. Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 20;27(18):2924-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.9563. Epub 2009 May 11.
PMID: 19433689BACKGROUNDZelefsky MJ, Eastham JA, Cronin AM, Fuks Z, Zhang Z, Yamada Y, Vickers A, Scardino PT. Metastasis after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a comparison of clinical cohorts adjusted for case mix. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1508-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2265. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
PMID: 20159826BACKGROUNDThompson IM Jr, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, Lucia MS, Miller G, Troyer D, Messing E, Forman J, Chin J, Swanson G, Canby-Hagino E, Crawford ED. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2329-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.19.2329.
PMID: 17105795BACKGROUNDHoffman KE, Nguyen PL, Chen MH, Chen RC, Choueiri TK, Hu JC, Kuban DA, D'Amico AV. Recommendations for post-prostatectomy radiation therapy in the United States before and after the presentation of randomized trials. J Urol. 2011 Jan;185(1):116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.086. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
PMID: 21074194BACKGROUNDMoinpour CM, Hayden KA, Unger JM, Thompson IM Jr, Redman MW, Canby-Hagino ED, Higgins BA, Sullivan JW, Lemmon D, Breslin S, Crawford ED, Southwest Oncology Group. Health-related quality of life results in pathologic stage C prostate cancer from a Southwest Oncology Group trial comparing radical prostatectomy alone with radical prostatectomy plus radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 1;26(1):112-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4505.
PMID: 18165645BACKGROUNDErho N, Crisan A, Vergara IA, Mitra AP, Ghadessi M, Buerki C, Bergstralh EJ, Kollmeyer T, Fink S, Haddad Z, Zimmermann B, Sierocinski T, Ballman KV, Triche TJ, Black PC, Karnes RJ, Klee G, Davicioni E, Jenkins RB. Discovery and validation of a prostate cancer genomic classifier that predicts early metastasis following radical prostatectomy. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e66855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066855. Print 2013.
PMID: 23826159BACKGROUNDKarnes RJ, Bergstralh EJ, Davicioni E, Ghadessi M, Buerki C, Mitra AP, Crisan A, Erho N, Vergara IA, Lam LL, Carlson R, Thompson DJ, Haddad Z, Zimmermann B, Sierocinski T, Triche TJ, Kollmeyer T, Ballman KV, Black PC, Klee GG, Jenkins RB. Validation of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis following radical prostatectomy in an at risk patient population. J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2047-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.017. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
PMID: 23770138BACKGROUNDBadani K, Thompson DJ, Buerki C, Davicioni E, Garrison J, Ghadessi M, Mitra AP, Wood PJ, Hornberger J. Impact of a genomic classifier of metastatic risk on postoperative treatment recommendations for prostate cancer patients: a report from the DECIDE study group. Oncotarget. 2013 Apr;4(4):600-9. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.918.
PMID: 23592338BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel W Lin, MD
The Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John L Gore, MD
University of Washington
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2014
First Posted
March 6, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02