Investigation of Linaclotide's Effect on the Bi-directional Brain and Gut Axis in IBS-C Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to understand how a drug called Linaclotide improves bowel function and abdominal pain in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C) as well as to examine whether Linaclotide alters communication between the brain and pelvic-floor region. Linaclotide has been shown to improve abdominal pain and bowel symptoms in IBS-C, and is approved by the FDA for the treatment of this condition. However, how exactly this drug works to relieve abdominal pain and discomfort in humans is not clearly known. Studies in animal models suggest that patients with IBS-C have hypersensitivity in the gut. Consequently, in IBS-C patients, there is rapid and excessive conduction of signals both from the brain and central nervous system region towards the pelvic-floor (anorectal axis) and the reverse direction. The investigators hypothesize that treatment with Linaclotide may improve/normalize these signals and thereby improve bowel symptoms. Investigators will test this theory using a new, noninvasive (and established) method of studying this communication pathway between the brain and gut.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 4, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2018
CompletedJuly 23, 2018
July 1, 2018
3.7 years
January 8, 2014
July 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
1: Change from baseline in Prolongation and normalization of anal CEP and rectal CEP responses at 10 weeks.
A rectal catheter will be inserted into the rectum, up to 10 cm from the anal verge. The threshold for first sensation and pain will be determined by increasing the electrical stimulation in steps of 1 mA. subsequent stimuli will be applied at an intensity of 75% of the difference between the first sensation and pain thresholds. The CEPs will be recorded in a quiet room in a semi-recumbent position. Four runs of 50 stimuli will be averaged for both the rectal and anal stimulation studies, with a 5-min rest period between each run and a 30 minute rest period between rectal and anal studies.
at baseline assessment and at 10 weeks following baseline
Change from Baseline in Prolongation and normalization of rectal MEP and anal MEP at 10 weeks.
A 70 mm figure of eight coil, positioned over the cranium's vertex. TThe coil will be placed with the anterior edge of the cross point over the region of interest, with the handle pointing backward (for midline grid points) or at an angle of 45º tangential to the scalp surface (for lateral grid points). We will perform TMS of the anorectal motor cortex and assess the anal and rectal MEPs (EMG), by using the anorectal probe.
at baseline assessment at at 10 weeks following this baseline assessment
Study Arms (2)
Linaclotide
ACTIVE COMPARATORLinaclotide 290micrograms q day 30 min before meal for a 10 week period
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo q day 30 min before meal for a 10 week period
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- During the previous year, all patients must have recurrent abdominal discomfort or pain for at least 3 days per month in the last 3 months associated with two or more of the following symptoms (36): i) improvement with defecation; ii) onset associated with a change in frequency of stool; and/or iii) onset associated with a change in form (appearance) of stool.
- No evidence for structural diseases- (excluded by colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy or barium enema). Patients over 50 will not be eligible to enroll unless they have had a colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy or barium enema within ten years prior to screening. Individuals under the age of 50 would only be required to undergo one of such diagnostic procedures if they present with alarm symptoms such as rectal bleeding, unexplained weight loss or anemia). There is no plan undergo such procedures as part of this research protocol. Therefore, individuals requiring such a procedure will be referred back to their treating physician (due to reaching age 50 and requiring a general screening of colon check or any age, due to alarm symptoms) and will not be enrolled in the study.
- No evidence of metabolic problems (to be excluded by laboratory testing; a comprehensive blood count and metabolic panel are required to be within six months of screening visit. If none are available on the patient's electronic records or records provided by an external provider, we will have them complete blood testing to exclude clinically significant metabolic abnormalities). The P.I. will decide if any values that fall out of range represent clinical significance or not.
- Women of childbearing potential must agree to a urine pregnancy test at screening and to avoid pregnancy throughout the study.
- On a prospective symptom/stool diary patients reported i) presence of abdominal pain/discomfort for at least 2 days per week; ii) hard or lumpy stools \>25% and loose or watery stools in \< 25% of bowel movements (IBS-C); (iii) loose or watery stools in \>25% of bowel movements and hard stools \<25% of Bowel Movements(IBS-D); \>25% of hard or loose stools within one week (IBS-M)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with laxative abuse, anorexia nervosa, and bulimia;
- Patients taking opioids (e.g. codeine or morphine), antispasmodics (dicyclomine or hyoscyamine), or muscle relaxants (e.g. cyclobenzaprine). If a patient is taking any of these drugs or supplements, and the P.I. determines that they may be able to safely come off of their medication, the patient may be eligible to re-screen, pending a two week minimum washout before enrollment;
- Patients with active episodic major depression will not be enrolled and will be referred for treatment, if necessary. Patients with a history of depression and have achieved stable remission are eligible.
- Patients with comorbid illnesses, severe cardiac disease, chronic renal failure or previous gastrointestinal surgery except cholecystectomy and appendectomy;
- Patients with neurologic diseases (e.g. head injuries, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, strokes, spinal cord injuries) or brain disorders prone to causing seizures;
- Patients experiencing impaired cognizance (mini mental score of \< 15) and/or legally blind;
- Women who are pregnant or likely to conceive (women with potential for pregnancy must use contraceptive measures to be included);
- Patients with ulcerative and Crohns colitis;
- Patients with rectal prolapse, anal fissure, anal surgery or inflamed hemorrhoids. Patients found to have any of these conditions are not eligible for enrollment due to the potential discomfort of probe placement. If a patient who is excluded due to anal fissure or inflamed hemorrhoids achieves full remission after the initial screening, they may be eligible for rescreening.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Augusta Universitylead
- Forest Laboratoriescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Augusta University
Augusta, Georgia, 30912, United States
Related Publications (1)
Rao SSC, Xiang X, Yan Y, Rattanakovit K, Patcharatrakul T, Parr R, Ayyala D, Sharma A. Randomised clinical trial: linaclotide vs placebo-a study of bi-directional gut and brain axis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jun;51(12):1332-1341. doi: 10.1111/apt.15772. Epub 2020 May 13.
PMID: 32406112DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2014
First Posted
March 5, 2014
Study Start
February 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 4, 2017
Study Completion
July 20, 2018
Last Updated
July 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07