EASYFLEX
Randomized, Comparative Study of 19G Flex Versus 22G Standard Needles for Pancreatic Solid Tumors Diagnosis.
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
124
1 country
1
Study Start
April 2013
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
July 6, 2016
Actual (reported)Study Completion
January 23, 2017
Actual (reported)The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic gain between 22G standard needle vs 19G Flex needles transduodenal punctures of masses of the pancreatic head.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
January 23, 2017
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
April 2013
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
February 26, 2014
Actual (reported)March 5, 2014
Actual (reported)July 6, 2016
Actual (reported)January 23, 2017
Actual (reported)accuracy of 19G Flex Expect needle in the histological diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumors of the head of pancreas
accuracy and diagnostic gain of fine needle aspiration under ultrasound endoscopy (EUS-FNA) for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors of the head of pancreas: comparison between 19G Flex and 22G standard needles punctures.
10 days
morbidity
2 minutes, up to day 30
quality of histology
10 days
puncture of head of pancreas
puncture of head of pancreas
puncture of head of pancreatic solid mass with fine needle aspiration under endoscopic ultrasonographic control. randomization: puncture with either 22G needle or 19G flex needle
puncture of head of pancreatic solid mass with fine needle aspiration under endoscopic ultrasonographic control. randomization: puncture with either 22G needle or 19G flex needle
Hopital Saint Joseph
Marseille, 13008, France
Jenssen C, Dietrich CF. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and trucut biopsy in gastroenterology - An overview. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(5):743-59. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2009.05.006.
Takemoto T, Aibe T, Fuji T, Okita K. Endoscopic ultrasonography. Clin Gastroenterol. 1986 Apr;15(2):305-19.
Erickson RA. EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Aug;60(2):267-79. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01529-9. No abstract available.
CHRISTIAN BOUSTIERE, MD
FRENCH SDE
124 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
February 26, 2014
First Posted
March 5, 2014
Study Start
April 2013
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, Dhar A, Vlavianos P, Monahan KJ. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.049.
Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS, Eum JB, Moon SH, Park DY, Seo DW, Lee SK, Jang SJ, Yun SC, Kim MH. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;105(8):1739-45. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.108. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Lichtenstein DR, Jagannath S, Baron TH, Anderson MA, Banerjee S, Dominitz JA, Fanelli RD, Gan SI, Harrison ME, Ikenberry SO, Shen B, Stewart L, Khan K, Vargo JJ. Sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Nov;68(5):815-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.029. No abstract available.
Adler DG, Jacobson BC, Davila RE, Hirota WK, Leighton JA, Qureshi WA, Rajan E, Zuckerman MJ, Fanelli RD, Baron TH, Faigel DO; ASGE. ASGE guideline: complications of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jan;61(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02393-4.
Al-Haddad M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, Gross SA, Hodgens CM, Toton RD, Raimondo M. The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):204-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995336. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
Carrara S, Arcidiacono PG, Mezzi G, Petrone MC, Boemo C, Testoni PA. Pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: complication rate and clinical course in a single centre. Dig Liver Dis. 2010 Jul;42(7):520-3. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.10.002. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
Boustiere C, Veitch A, Vanbiervliet G, Bulois P, Deprez P, Laquiere A, Laugier R, Lesur G, Mosler P, Nalet B, Napoleon B, Rembacken B, Ajzenberg N, Collet JP, Baron T, Dumonceau JM; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Endoscopy and antiplatelet agents. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2011 May;43(5):445-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256317. Epub 2011 May 4.
Fayers PM, Machin D. Sample size: how many patients are necessary? Br J Cancer. 1995 Jul;72(1):1-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.268.
Laquiere A, Lefort C, Maire F, Aubert A, Gincul R, Prat F, Grandval P, Croizet O, Boulant J, Vanbiervliet G, Penaranda G, Lecomte L, Napoleon B, Boustiere C. 19 G nitinol needle versus 22 G needle for transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic solid masses: a randomized study. Endoscopy. 2019 May;51(5):436-443. doi: 10.1055/a-0757-7714. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
Primary Completion
July 6, 2016
Actual (reported)Study Completion
January 23, 2017
Actual (reported)Last Updated
April 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-11
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: