NCT02075879

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of a nurse-led case management programme on home exercise training for haemodialysis patients. We hypothesised that: a. There is no significant difference in physical functioning between participants receiving the nurse-led home exercise training programme and those receiving the comparison care. b. There is no difference in depression between participants receiving the nurse-led home exercise training programme and those receiving the comparison care. c. There is no difference in quality of life and health perception between participants receiving the nurse-led home exercise training programme and those receiving the comparison care. d. There is no difference in physical activity levels between participants receiving the nurse-led home exercise training programme and those receiving the comparison care. e. There is no difference in perceived benefits and barriers of exercise between participants receiving the nurse-led home exercise training programme and those receiving the comparison care. The study was a randomized controlled trial conducted in two haemodialysis units of two tertiary hospitals in Nanjing, China. Participants were randomly assigned to either study group or comparison group. Participants in both groups received the in-center exercise training (20 minutes) before haemodialysis sessions weekly for 6 weeks and were instructed to perform exercise at home. The in-center training was focused on flexibility and strengthening exercise. Patients were encouraged to have cardiovascular exercises at home which will improve their cardiovascular conditions and endurance. The list of cardiovascular exercise included brisk walking, bicycling, jogging. Participants in the study group were instructed to start walking or brisk walking at low duration and gradually progress to a maximum of 30 minutes daily per week. To facilitate exercise progression, the nurse case managers discussed exercise benefits, explored exercise barriers and developed mutual goals with patients. The nurse motivated them and checked the exercise behaviors to ensure adherence to the recommended exercise regime. The nurse case managers interviewed the study group patients weekly for six weeks and biweekly for another six weeks. Participants in the comparison group only participated in the in-center exercise training. The comparison group patients received usual care from the nurse without the interviews and mutual goals developed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
113

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2013

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 27, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 3, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

March 3, 2014

Status Verified

February 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

February 27, 2014

Last Update Submit

February 27, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from baseline in walking speed on the 10-meter walking test at week 6 and change from baseline in walking speed on 10-meter walking test at week 12

    Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change from baseline in time in completing the 10-repetition sit-to-stand test (10-STS) at week 6, and change from baseline in time in completing 10-STS at week 12

    Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  • Change from baseline in perceived exercise benefits and barriers on the Dialysis Patient-perceived Exercise Benefits and Barriers Scale (DPEBBS) at week 6 and change from baseline in the DPEBBS score at week 12

    Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  • Change from baseline in health-related quality of life on the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (KDQOL-36) at week 6, and change from baseline in KDQOL-36 score at week 12

    Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  • Change from baseline in depressive symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at week 6, and change from baseline in BDI score at week 12

    Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  • Change from baseline in self-perceived health in the first item in the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire at week 6, and change from baseline in self-perceived health score at week 12

    Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Nurse-led interviewing

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in experimental arm received the in-center exercise training (20 minutes) before hemodialysis sessions weekly for 6 weeks and were instructed to perform exercise at home. They were additionally instructed to start walking or brisk walking at low duration and gradually progress to a maximum of 30 minutes daily per week. To facilitate exercise progression, the nurse case managers discussed exercise benefits, explored exercise barriers and developed mutual goals with patients. The nurse motivated them and checked the exercise behaviors to ensure adherence to the recommended exercise regime. The nurse case managers interviewed the patients weekly for six weeks and biweekly for another six weeks.

Behavioral: Nurse-led interviewing

Brief group exercise

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants received the in-center exercise training (20 minutes) before hemodialysis sessions weekly for 6 weeks and were instructed to perform exercise at home. The in-center training was conducted by the researcher with a group of four-to six participants focusing on flexibility and strengthening exercise only.

Other: Brief group exercise

Interventions

Participants in experimental arm received regular face-to-face interviews during dialysis sessions conducted by the designated case managers every week for 6 weeks and biweekly for another 6 weeks.

Nurse-led interviewing

Participants in this arm only participated in the brief in-center exercise training. They received usual care from the nurse without the interviews and mutual goals developed.

Brief group exercise

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Dialysis for \>3 months;
  • Age \> 18 years;
  • Kt/V (dialysis adequacy) \>1.2;
  • Hemoglobin level \> 8g/dl;
  • Ambulatory without assistance ;
  • Able to communicate in Chinese;
  • Able to and willing to provide consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Unstable physical conditions or severe musculoskeletal diseases that might hinder exercise training;
  • Severe hearing impairment;
  • Diagnosed with mental diseases;
  • Meeting or exceeding the exercise recommendation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, China

Location

The Second Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, China

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Bernier-Jean A, Beruni NA, Bondonno NP, Williams G, Teixeira-Pinto A, Craig JC, Wong G. Exercise training for adults undergoing maintenance dialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 12;1(1):CD014653. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014653.

  • Tao X, Chow SK, Wong FK. A nurse-led case management program on home exercise training for hemodialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jun;52(6):1029-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Susan KY Chow, PhD

    School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2014

First Posted

March 3, 2014

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2013

Study Completion

December 1, 2013

Last Updated

March 3, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-02

Locations