NCT02071277

Brief Summary

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a cornerstone of management of acute respiratory failure, but MV per se can provoke ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), especially in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lung protective ventilation strategy has been proved to prevent VILI by using low tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg of ideal body weight and limiting plateau pressure to less than 30 cmH2O. However, heavy sedation or even paralysis are frequently used to ensure the protective ventilation strategy, both of which are associated with respiratory muscles weakness. Maintaining of spontaneous breathing may decrease the need of sedative drug and improve gas exchange by promoting lung recruitment. Pressure-targeted mode is the most frequent way of delivering after 48 hours of initiating MV. Three types of pressure-controlled mode are available in intubated patients: Biphasic Intermittent Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP), Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV), and Pressure-Assist Controlled Ventilation (also called BIPAPassist). They are based on pressure regulation but have the difference in terms of synchronization between the patient and the ventilator. The different working principle of these modes may result in different breathing pattern and consequently different in tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure, which may be potentially harmful. The investigators bench study with a lung model demonstrated higher tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure with the BIPAPassist over APRV despite similar pressure settings and patient's simulated effort. However, the impact of each mode on the delivered tidal volume and the transpulmonary pressure in spontaneously breathing mechanically ventilated patients is currently unknown. Their hypothesis is that when the investigators compare the three pressure-controlled modes, the asynchronous mode (APRV) will result in more protective ventilation strategy over the two other modes (BIPAP and BIPAPassist).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2014

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 25, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2014

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 15, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

April 19, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

February 7, 2014

Last Update Submit

April 18, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Mechanical ventilationAirway pressure release ventilationBiphasic intermittent positive airway pressurePressure-controlled ventilationLung protective ventilationSpontaneous breathing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Tidal volume in each mode of ventilation

    20 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Inspiratory transpulmonary pressure in each mode of ventilation

    20 minutes

  • Patient work of breathing

    20 minutes

  • The frequency of each breath-type according to the mode

    20 minutes

Study Arms (1)

Pressure targeted modes

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Pressure targeted modes

Interventions

Intervention involving three different pressure-targeted modes (APRV, BIPAP, and BIPAPassist) each in a random order generated by a computer on one ventilator. Each mode will be studied for 20 minutes.

Pressure targeted modes

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female patient,
  • Age over 18 years,
  • Patient already ventilated with assist controlled mode (volume or pressure) and patient triggering the ventilator,
  • Arterial line indwelling or planning to insert this line,
  • Written informed consent signed and dated by the patient/next of kin after full explanation of the study by the study team and prior to study participation,
  • Patient consent will be requested as soon as the patient will be able to provide informed written consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Hemodynamic instability
  • \> 20% variation of mean arterial pressure and/or heart rate (HR) in the last 2 hours,
  • Need for high dose of vasopressor (higher than 0.2 mcg/kg/min of levophed),
  • High PEEP (\> 12 cmH2O) and/or high fraction of inspired oxygen inspired oxygen fraction (\> 0.6)
  • Severe acidosis (pH ≤ 7.20), or severe alkalosis (pH \> 7.55)
  • Presence of a known esophageal problem, active upper gastrointestinal bleeding or any other contraindication to the insertion of a oro- or naso-gastric tube,
  • Pregnant patient,
  • Presence of intracranial hypertension,
  • Known chronic neuromuscular disease significantly impairing the spontaneous breathing

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada

Location

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5G1X5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Richard JC, Lyazidi A, Akoumianaki E, Mortaza S, Cordioli RL, Lefebvre JC, Rey N, Piquilloud L, Sferrazza Papa GF, Mercat A, Brochard L. Potentially harmful effects of inspiratory synchronization during pressure preset ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Nov;39(11):2003-10. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3032-7. Epub 2013 Aug 9.

    PMID: 23928898BACKGROUND
  • Rittayamai N, Beloncle F, Goligher EC, Chen L, Mancebo J, Richard JM, Brochard L. Effect of inspiratory synchronization during pressure-controlled ventilation on lung distension and inspiratory effort. Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Oct 6;7(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0324-z.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory InsufficiencyVentilator-Induced Lung Injury

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration DisordersRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung InjuryLung Diseases

Study Officials

  • Laurent Brochard, Dr.

    Unity Health Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2014

First Posted

February 25, 2014

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion

January 1, 2017

Study Completion

March 15, 2017

Last Updated

April 19, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Locations