Non-anesthesiologist Administered Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy - a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
277
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Propofol is the preferred sedation for colonoscopy. There is debate on the safety of the administration of propofol by non-anesthesiologists, despite moderate quality evidence that support its' use. There is only one small trial of a direct comparison of propofol sedation by anesthesiologists versus non-anesthesiologists. Our aim is to compare the incidence of sedation related adverse events, the procedural quality indicators, times (onset, recovery, discharge) and patient satisfaction between non-anesthesiologist administered propofol sedation (NAAP) sedation and anesthesiologist propofol sedation. A randomized clinical trial with the incidence of sedation related minor adverse events as primary endpoint will be conducted. Secondary endpoints include procedure quality indicators, propofol dosage and patient satisfaction. A sample size of 330 subjects (2 arms of 165 patients) will be needed in order to obtain 90% power and a 5% significance level to exclude a 15% difference (15 - 30%) in adverse events incidence, estimated from our pilot experience. The sample size was adjusted for a 2% cross-over rate. Informed and consenting patients undergoing colonoscopy examinations will be randomly assigned to one of two arms. One group will be sedated by an anesthesiologist according to a protocol of propofol mono-sedation. The other group will be sedated with propofol boluses, according to the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) NAAP guideline, with a 3-man team consisting of one endoscopist, one endoscopy nurse and a sedation nurse, trained in NAAP and exclusively dedicated to sedation and patient monitoring.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedOctober 12, 2015
October 1, 2015
1.2 years
February 16, 2014
October 8, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Minor adverse events
Minor adverse events as defined by the International Sedation Task Force, including peripheral O2 saturation between 75-90% for less than 60 seconds, apnea, airway obstruction, sedation failure, allergic reaction without anaphylaxis, convulsion, brady/tachycardia and hypo/hypertension (\>25% change from baseline)
During the sedation period
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Propofol dosage
During the colonoscopy - an estimated mean time of 20 minutes
Patient satisfaction
Before discharge - estimated mean recovery time of 1 hour
colonoscopy quality indicators
During the procedure
Patient satisfaction 2
Before discharge - estimated mean recovery time of 1 hour
Study Arms (2)
Non-anesthesiologist propofol sedation
EXPERIMENTALBolus propofol sedation by non-anesthesiologist
Anesthesiologist administered propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORPropofol sedation administered by an anesthesiologist
Interventions
Bolus propofol sedation administered according to non-anesthesiologist propofol sedation guidelines of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Propofol sedation by an anesthesiologist
Elective total colonoscopy with or without biopsies, polypectomies or mucosal resection, as clinically indicated
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Referred for elective colonoscopy as outpatients
- Must be able to provide the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class \>2
- Pregnant women
- Difficult airway predictors (more than 2 ou Mallampati \>3)
- Allergy to propofol or its' components
- IV drugs abuse
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Beatriz Ângelo
Loures, 2674-514, Portugal
Related Publications (3)
Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Aparicio JR, Beilenhoff U, Knape JT, Ortmann M, Paspatis G, Ponsioen CY, Racz I, Schreiber F, Vilmann P, Wehrmann T, Wientjes C, Walder B; NAAP Task Force Members. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology Guideline: Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2010 Nov;42(11):960-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255728. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
PMID: 21072716BACKGROUNDDumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Beilenhoff U, Vilmann P, Hornslet P, Aparicio JR, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Giostra E, Ortmann M, Knape JT, Ladas S, Paspatis G, Ponsioen CY, Racz I, Wehrmann T, Walder B. European curriculum for sedation training in gastrointestinal endoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA). Endoscopy. 2013 Jun;45(6):496-504. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344142. Epub 2013 May 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 23702777BACKGROUNDFerreira AO, Torres J, Barjas E, Nunes J, Gloria L, Ferreira R, Rocha M, Pereira S, Dias S, Santos AA, Cravo M. Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation for colonoscopy is safe in low risk patients: results of a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2016 Aug;48(8):747-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-105560. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
PMID: 27100716DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexandre O Ferreira, MD
Hospital Beatriz Ângelo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2014
First Posted
February 20, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 12, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10