Comparison of Clinical Performance of the Guardian Laryngeal Mask With LMA Proseal
Guardian
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare insertion characteristics of 2 different supraglottic devices (Guardian LMA and Proseal LMA) and to observe any associated complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 14, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 18, 2014
CompletedJanuary 26, 2015
December 1, 2014
1.2 years
January 13, 2014
December 10, 2014
January 10, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oropharyngeal Seal Pressure
This will be measured over the full range of cuff volumes (0-40 ml) and at an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O.
5 min
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Anatomic Position
5 min
Other Outcomes (1)
Amount of Air Added to Keep Cuff Pressure 60cmH20.
30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Guardian
EXPERIMENTALDevice: Guardian Laryngeal Mask
Proseal
EXPERIMENTALDevice:Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway
Interventions
Guardian Laryngeal Mask: The Guardian Laryngeal Mask (Ultimate Medical Pty Ltd, Richmond, Vic, Australia) is a new silicone-based single-use extraglottic airway device that forms a seal with the glottis for ventilation and with the hypopharynx for airway protection, and provides a gastric drainage port. In addition, it has a port for suctioning material from the hypopharynx and a pilot balloon valve that constantly monitors intracuff pressure. In the following randomized, non-crossover study, the investigators test if oropharyngeal leak pressures differed between the Guardian Laryngeal Mask and the LMA proseal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway: Silicon based, reusable, modified dorsal cuff and drainage tube
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 65 years of age
- Mallampati score less than 3
- thyromental distance more than 6.5 cm
- mouth opening more than \>2.5 cm
- a body mass index less than 35 kg/m2;
You may not qualify if:
- Body weight 50 Kg
- Pregnancy
- Difficult airway
- Recent history of upper respiratory tract infection and sore throats
- A history of esophageal reflux disease
- ENT surgery
- Laparoscopic surgery
- Inability to understand the Study Information Sheet and provide a written consent to take part in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300052, China
Related Publications (1)
Pajiyar AK, Wen Z, Wang H, Ma L, Miao L, Wang G. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 May 1;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0039-3.
PMID: 25929558DERIVED
Limitations and Caveats
We only use size-4 devices in adult patients with neuromuscular blockade, we presumed that same results would be obtained in patients who have not received neuromuscular blockade. lastly our data was not blinded causing potential source of bias.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Haiyun Wang
- Organization
- tianjinMUGH
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- vice-Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2014
First Posted
February 14, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 26, 2015
Results First Posted
December 18, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12