NCT02061930

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to review the long-term soft tissue stability and the long-term esthetic results of single crowns supported by tissue level implants placed in non-augmented healed sites. The hypothesis of the present study is that tissue level implants can achieve ideal esthetic outcomes in non-augmented healed sites.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2014

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2014

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2014

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 13, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

February 13, 2014

Status Verified

February 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

February 7, 2014

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

single toothdental implantaesthetics outcomelong termsoft tissue recessionpink esthetic scorewhite esthetic score

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • aesthetic scores

    The photos were taken 1 hour after cementation of the crowns Digital camera will being used during the examinations (Nikon D70, Nikon Medical Objective circular flash; Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The evaluation will be based on the pictures of the prosthesis and soft tissue around the crown which supported by implant. 7 parameters will be assessed for PES :mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft-tissue level, soft-tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft-tissue color and texture. 5 parameters will be assessed for WES:general tooth form; outline and volume of the clinical crown; color; surface texture; and translucency and characterization. For both PES and WES, the score of 2, 1, or 0 is assigned to each parameter by certain evaluation standard

    baseline

  • aesthetic scores

    The pictures were taken routinely during patients's revisit . The PES will be assessed via photographs, in order to evaluate the changes of the soft tissue around the crown. WES will not be evaluated at this time point.

    6-10 months after crown placement

  • aesthetic scores

    The photos will be taken by the same digital camera (Nikon D70, Nikon Medical Objective circular flash; Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) both PES and WES will be evaluated at this time point

    5-8 years after crown placement

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Modified plaque index (mPLI)

    5-8 years after restoration

  • marginal bone resorption

    5-8 years after restoration

  • Modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI)

    5-8 years after crown placement

  • probing depth (PD)

    5-8 years after crown placement

Study Arms (1)

single crowns supported by implants

single crowns supported by implants placed in the anterior maxilla region, periodontally healthy

Procedure: single crowns supported by implants

Interventions

The implant placement procedures were planned based on clinical and radiographic evaluation. During the surgeries, the mid-crestal incision and intra-crevicular incision were made following local articaine infiltration anesthesia. No releasing incisions were made. After full-thickness flaps were elevated labially and lingually to expose the alveolar ridge, the implants were placed according to the standard surgical procedures defined by the manufacturer. After a healing time of 10-16 weeks, implant-level impressions were taken. The porcelain (Ivoclar-Vivadent AG, Schaan, Lichtenstein) fused to noble metal crowns were fabricated. Abutment screws were torqued to 15 Ncm. Crowns were cemented with HY-bond Glassionomer Cement

Also known as: Straumann dental implants SLA sp
single crowns supported by implants

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Have at least one implant-supported single crown in the anterior maxilla region (13-23) with Straumann (Institute Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland) tissue level implants placed between December 2005 and October 2008.

You may qualify if:

  • Have had the tooth extraction at least 3 months before implant surgery.
  • Did not receive soft or hard tissue augmentation before or in conjunction with implant surgery.
  • Did not receive restorative treatment of the adjacent teeth.
  • Underwent conventional healing and loading protocol after implant surgery.
  • Have both neighboring teeth and corresponding teeth in the mandible.
  • For additional, the patients should have
  • Photographs of the anterior teeth, the photos should have been taken at right after crown placement and at the 6-10 months recall visit.
  • Radiographs of the implant-supported single crowns, the radiographs should have been taken at right after crown placement.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who refused to join the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dept. Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology ,Shanghai 9th People's Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200011, China

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.

    PMID: 16307569BACKGROUND
  • Belser U, Buser D, Higginbottom F. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding esthetics in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:73-4. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15635947BACKGROUND
  • Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):140-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435.

    PMID: 19228100BACKGROUND
  • Buser D, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Frei M, Belser UC. Long-term stability of contour augmentation with early implant placement following single tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a prospective, cross-sectional study in 41 patients with a 5- to 9-year follow-up. J Periodontol. 2013 Nov;84(11):1517-27. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120635. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

    PMID: 23347346BACKGROUND
  • Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005 Apr;25(2):113-9.

    PMID: 15839587BACKGROUND
  • Henriksson K, Jemt T. Measurements of soft tissue volume in association with single-implant restorations: a 1-year comparative study after abutment connection surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(4):181-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00034.x.

    PMID: 15841578BACKGROUND
  • Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Collys K, Cleymaet R, De Rouck T. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Aug;38(8):746-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01748.x.

    PMID: 21752044BACKGROUND
  • Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Dierens M, De Rouck T. Single implant treatment in healing versus healed sites of the anterior maxilla: an aesthetic evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):517-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00300.x. Epub 2010 Jul 17.

    PMID: 20662859BACKGROUND
  • Lai HC, Zhang ZY, Wang F, Zhuang LF, Liu X, Pu YP. Evaluation of soft-tissue alteration around implant-supported single-tooth restoration in the anterior maxilla: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jun;19(6):560-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01522.x.

  • Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Meijndert L, Raghoebar GM. A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues--the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):645-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01128.x.

  • Gallucci GO, Grutter L, Nedir R, Bischof M, Belser UC. Esthetic outcomes with porcelain-fused-to-ceramic and all-ceramic single-implant crowns: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jan;22(1):62-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01997.x. Epub 2010 Sep 24.

  • Dierens M, de Bruecker E, Vandeweghe S, Kisch J, de Bruyn H, Cosyn J. Alterations in soft tissue levels and aesthetics over a 16-22 year period following single implant treatment in periodontally-healthy patients: a retrospective case series. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Mar;40(3):311-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12049. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

Study Officials

  • Hongchang Lai, DDS

    Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dept. Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2014

First Posted

February 13, 2014

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion

April 1, 2014

Study Completion

June 1, 2014

Last Updated

February 13, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-02

Locations